Mechanisms for the generation and regulation of sequential behaviour

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 389-416

  Cooper, Richard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142040632     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951508032000121779     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. ALLPORT, D.A., STYLES, E.A. & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. UMILTA & M. MOSCOVITCH (Eds) Attention and performance XV: conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. ALTMANN, E.M. & GRAY, W.D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: the functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13, 27-33.
3. ALTMANN, E.M. & GRAY, W.D. (submitted). Attention, memory and mental set: an integrated model of task switching and maintenance. Submitted to Psychological Review.
4. ANDERSON, J.R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. ANDERSON, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. ANDERSON, J.R. & LEBIERE, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. ANDERSON, J.R., BOTHELL, D., BYRNE, M.D. & LEBIERE, C. (submitted). An integrated theory of the mind. Submitted to Psychological Review.
8. BALKENIUS, C. (2000). Attention, habituation and conditioning: toward a computational model. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 171-204.
9. BECHTEL, W. & ABRAHAMSEN, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: an introduction to parallel processing in networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. BOTVINICK, M. & PLAUT, D. (2000). Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathologies. Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience Conference.
11. BOTVINICK, M. & PLAUT, D. (in press). Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathologies. Psychological Review.
12. BOTVINICK, M.M., BRAVER, T.S., BARCH, D.M., CARTER, C.S. & COHEN, J.D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
13. BURGESS, N. & HITCH, G.J. (1992). Toward a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 429-460.
14. BURGESS, P.W. (2000). Real-world multitasking from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In S. MONSELL & J. DRIVER (Eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of cognitive processes (pp. 465-472). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. BURGESS, P.W. & SHALLICE, T. (1996). Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 34, 263-273.
16. BURGESS, P.W., VEITCH, E., DE LACY COSTELLO, A. & SHALLICE, T. (2000). The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia, 34, 263-276.
17. BYRNE, M.D. & AXDERSON, J.R. (1998). Perception and action. In J.R. ANDERSON & C. LEBIERE (Eds) The atomic components of thought (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. BYRNE, M.D. & ANDERSON, J.R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
19. CLEEREMANS, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. COHEN, J.D. & HUSTON, T.A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. UMILTA & M. MOSCOVITCH (Eds) Attention and performance XV: conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 453-476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. COHEN, J.D., DUNBAR, K. & McCLELLAND, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
22. COLTHEART, M., CURTIS, B., ATKINS, P. & HALLER, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
23. COOPER, R. & SHALLICE, T. (1995). Soar and the case for unified theories of cognition. Cognition, 55, 115-145.
24. COOPER, R. & SHALLICE, T. (2000). Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297-338.
25. COOPER, R., SHALLICE, T. & FARRINGDON, J. (1995). Symbolic and continuous processes in the automatic selection of actions. In J. HALLAM (Ed.) Hybrid problems, hybrid solutions (pp. 27-37). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
26. COOPER, R., SCHWARTZ, M.F., YULE, P., WARRICK, S. & SHALLICE, T. (in preparation). The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living.
27. DAWSON, M.R.W. (1998). Understanding cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. DELL, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
29. DELL, G.S., BURGER, L.K. & SVEC, W.R. (1997). Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147.
30. DELLA SALA, S., MARCHETTI, C. & SPINNLER, H. (1991). Right-sided anarchic (alien) hand: a longitudinal study. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1113-1127.
31. DE RENZI, E. & LUCCHELLI, F. (1988). Ideational apraxia. Brain, 111, 1173-1185.
32. DETWEILER, M. & SCHNEIDER, W. (1991). Modelling the acquisition of dual-task skill in a connectionist/control architecture. In D.L. DAMOS (Ed.) Multiple-task performance (pp. 69-99). London: Taylor & Francis.
33. DUNCAN, J. (1986). Disorganisation of behaviour after frontal lobe damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 271-290.
34. DUNCAN, J., BURGESS, P.W. & EMSLIE, H. (1995). Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 261-268.
35. ELMAN, J.L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-212.
36. ELMAN, J.L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71-99.
37. ERIKSEN, B.A. & ERIKSEN, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
38. FRAWLEY, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. FRAWLEY, W. (2002). Control in cross-domain mental computation: evidence from language breakdown. Computational Intelligence, 18, 1-28.
40. FRITH, C.D. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. London: Taylor & Francis.
41. GILBERT, S. & SHALLICE, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
42. GLASSPOOL, D.W. (1998). Modelling serial order in behaviour: studies of spelling. PhD thesis, Department of Psychology, University College London.
43. GOLDMAN-RAKIC, P.S. (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational knowledge. In F. PLUM & V. MOUNTCASTLE (Eds) Handbook of physiology, Vol. 5 (pp. 373-417). Bethesda, MD: American Psychological Society.
44. GRATTON, G., COLES, M.G.H. & DONCHIN, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 480-506.
45. GROSSBERG, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 87, 1-51.
46. GROSSBERG, S. (1987). Competitive learning: from interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cognitive Science, 11, 23-63.
47. HARTLEY, T. & HOUGHTON, G. (1996). A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 1-31.
48. HENSON, R.N.A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: the start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
49. HINTON, G.E. & SHALLICE, T. (1989). Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
50. HINTON, G.E., McCLELLAND, J.L. & RUMELHART, D.E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D.E. RUMELHART & J.L. McCLELLAND (Eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 76-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. HOUGHTON, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: a neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In R. DALE, C. MELLISH & M. ZOCK (Eds) Current research in natural language generation (pp. 287-319). London: Academic Press.
52. HOUGHTON, G. & HARTLEY, T. (1996). Parallel models of serial behaviour: Lashley revisited. PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, 2(25); available online at http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/psyche-2-25-houghton.html.
53. HOUGHTON, G. & TIPPER, S.P. (1994). A model of inhibitory processes in selective attention. In D. DAGENBACH & T.H. CARR (Eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. HOUGHTON, G., GLASSPOOL, D.W. & SHALLICE, T. (1994). Spelling and serial recall: insights from a competitive queuing model. In G.D.A. BROWN & N.C. ELLIS (Eds) Handbook of spelling: theory, process and intervention (pp. 365-404). Chichester: John Wiley.
55. HUMPHREYS, G.W. & FORDE, E.M.E. (1998). Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 771-811.
56. HUMPHREYS, G.W., FORDE, E.M.E. & FRANCIS, D. (2000). The organisation of sequential actions. In S. MONSELL & J. DRIVER (Eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of cognitive processes (pp. 427-442). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. JORDON, M.I. (1986). Serial order: a parallel distributed approach. ICI report 8604. Institute for Cognitive Science, UC San Diego, CA.
58. JUST, M.A. & CARPENTER, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
59. JUST, M.A., CARPENTER, P.A. & VARMA, S. (1999). Computational modeling of high-level cognition and brain function. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 128-136.
60. KIERAS, D.E. & MEYER, D.E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance, Part 2: accounts of the psychological refractory-period phenomenon. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
61. KIERAS, D.E., MEYER, D.E., BALLAS, J.A. & LAUBER, E.J. (2000). Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: where to from here? In S. MONSELL & J. DRIVER (Eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of cognitive processes (pp. 681-712). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. KIMBERG, D.Y. & FARAH, M.J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: the role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 411-428.
63. KLAHR, D., LANGLEY, P. & NEECHES, R. (1987). Production system models of learning and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. LAIRD, J.E., NEWELL, A. & ROSENBLOOM, P.S. (1987). SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1-64.
65. LAMING, D.R.J. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times. London: Academic Press.
66. LASHLEY, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behaviour. In L.A. JEFFRESS (Ed), Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour (pp. 112-136). New York: John Wiley.
67. LEHMKUHL, G. & POECK, K. (1981). A disturbance in the conceptual organization of actions in patients with ideational apraxia. Cortex, 17, 153-158.
68. LHERMITTE, F. (1983). Utilisation behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
69. LIEPMANN, H. (1920). Apraxie. Ergebnisse der Gesamten Medizin, 1, 561-543.
70. LURIA, A.R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. London: Tavistock.
71. LYONS, M. & ROBBINS, T.W. (1975). The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In W.B. ESSMAN & L. VALZELLI (Eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology, Vol. 2 (pp. 80-163). New York: Spectrum.
72. McCLELLAND, J.L. (1992). Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, interactive networks. In D.E. MEYER & S. KORNBLUM (Eds) Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp 655-688). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. McCLELLAND, J.L. & RUMELHART, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
74. MEYER, D.E. & KIERAS, D.E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance, Part 1: basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
75. NEWELL, A. (1973). Production systems: models of control structures. In W.G. CHASE (Ed.) Visual information processing (pp. 463-526). New York: Academic Press.
76. NEWELL, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. NEWELL, A. & SIMON, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
78. NORMAN, D.A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1-15.
79. PAGE, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: a localist manifesto. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 443-467.
80. PERRET, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe in man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323-330.
81. PLAUT, D. & McCLELLAND, J. (1993). Generalisation with componential attraction: word and nonword reading in an attractor network. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 824-829). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. PLAUT, D.C. & SHALLICE, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
83. POSNER, M.I. & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. HOUMA & D.G. BOUWHUIS (Eds) Attention and performance X: control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. RABBIT, P.M.A. (1966). Errors and error-correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
85. RAYMOND, J.E, SHAPIRO, K.L. & ARNELL, K.M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
86. REASON, J.T. (1979). Actions not as planned: the price of automatisation. In G. UNDERWOOD & R. STEVENS (Eds) Aspects of consciousness, Vol. 1: psychological issues (pp. 67-89). London: Academic Press.
87. REASON, J.T. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In W. PARASURAMAN & R. DAVIES (Eds) Varieties of attention (pp. 515-549). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
88. RIDDOCH, M.J., HUMPHREYS, G.W., COLTHEART, M. & FUNNELL, E. (1998). Semantic systems or system? Neurological evidence re-examined. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 3-25.
89. RUMELHART, D.E. & NORMAN, D.A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: a study of cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1-36.
90. RUMIATI, R.I. & HUMPHREYS, G.W. (1998). Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 631-647.
91. SALVUCCI, D.D. & MACUGA, K.L. (2001). Predicting the effects of cell-phone dialing on driver performance. In E. ALTMANN, A. CLEEREMANS, C.D. SCHUNN & W.D. GRAY (Eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 25-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. SCHNEIDER, W. & OLIVER, W.L. (1991). An instructable connectionist/control architecture: using rule-based instructions to accomplish connectionist learning in a human time scale. In K. VAN LEHN (Ed.) Architectures for intelligence: the 22nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp 113-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
93. SCHWARTZ, M.F., REED, E.S., MONTGOMERY, M.W., PALMER, C. & MAYER, N.H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: a case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381-414.
94. SCHWARTZ, M.F., MONTGOMERY, M.W., FITZPATRICK-DE SALME, E.J., OCHIPA, C., COSLETT, H.B. & MAYER, N.H. (1995). Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 863-892.
95. SEIDENBERG, M.S. & McCLELLAND, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 9, 523-568.
96. SHALLICE, T. (1987). Impairments of semantic processing: multiple dissociations. In M. COLTHEART, G. SARTORI & R. JOB (Eds) The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 111-127). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
97. SHALLICE, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. SHALLICE, T., BURGESS, P.W., SCHON, F. & BAXTER, D.M. (1989). The origins of utilisation behaviour. Brain, 112, 1587-1598.
99. SOHN, M.-H. & ANDERSON, J.R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: two component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
100. TIPPER, S.P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
101. TUCKER, M. & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
102. TURING, A.M. (1937/1965). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs-problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, Vol. 42, reprinted in M. DAVIS (Ed.) The undecidable basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions (pp. 116-154). New York: Raven Press Books.
103. TURING, A.M. (1937/1965). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs-problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, Vol. 42, reprinted in M. DAVIS (Ed.) The undecidable basic papers on undecidable propositions, unsolvable problems and computable functions (pp. 116-154). New York: Raven Press Books.
104. TZELGOV, J., HENIK, A. & BERGER, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory and Cognition, 20, 727-735.
105. USHER, M. & McCLELLAND, J.L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: the leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
106. VAN GELDER, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615-628.
107. VON NEUMANN, J. (1947). Preliminary discussion of the logical design of an electronic computing instrument. US Army Ordnance Report.
108. WELLS, A. (1998). Turing's analysis of computation and theories of cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 22, 269-294.