Beyond Generic Models for Information System Quality: The Use of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)

Systems Research and Behavioral Science

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 531-549

  Kanungo, Shivraj ^a   Bhatnagar, Vivek V ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Indian Railways   (India)

Author keywords

Interpretive structural model; MIS; Quality

Indexed keywords

INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING (ISM);

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0142021954     PISSN: 10927026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sres.476     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersson T, von Hellens LA. 1997. Information systems work quality. Information and Software Technology 39(12): 837-844.
2. Auer T. 1998. Quality of IS use. European Journal of Information Systems 7(3): 192-201.
3. Baroudi JJ, Orlikowski WJ. 1988. A short-form measure of user information satisfaction. Journal of Management Information Systems 4(4): 44-59.
4. Bell S. 1998. Managing and learning with logical frameworks: the case of an MIS project in China. Human Systems Management 17(1): 15-27.
5. Benbasat I, Zmud RW. 1999. Empirical research, in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 23(1): 3-16.
6. Berry LL, Parasuraman A. 1997. Listening to the customer: the concept of a service-quality information system. Sloan Management Review 38(3): 65-76.
7. Boloix G. 1997. System evaluation and quality improvement. Journal of Systems and Software 36(3): 297-311.
8. Broadbent M, Butler C, Hansell A. 1994. Business and technology agenda for information systems executives. International Journal of Information Management 14(6): 411-427.
9. Butterfield J. 1998. The analyst's view of complex systems projects. Information Systems Management 15(1): 34-40.
10. Broome BJ. 2000. Building community in a protracted conflict situation: applications of interactive design methodologies with citizen peace-building efforts in Cyprus. In Baylor University Workshop on Practical Theory, Public Participation, and Community, 27-29 January 2000.
11. Dahlberg T, Jarvinen J. 1997. Challenges to information system quality. Information and Software Technology 39(12): 809-818.
12. Davenport TH, Markus ML. 1999. Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly 23(1): 19-23.
13. Davis F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319-338.
14. Edwards RL. 1986. The competing values approach to organizational effectiveness: a tool for agency administrators. Administration in Social Work 10(4): 1-14.
15. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Wesley: Boston, MA.
16. Grant L, Evans A. 1994. Principles of Behavior Analysis. HarperCollins: New York.
17. Gregoire J, Lustman F. 1993. The stage hypothesis revisited: an EDP professional's point of view. Information & Management 24(5): 237-245.
18. Hardgrave BC, Wilson RL, Eastman K. 1999. Toward a contingency model for selecting an information system prototyping strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(2): 113-136.
19. Harrington D, Akehurst G. 2000. An empirical study of service quality implementation. Service Industries Journal 20(2): 133-156.
20. Hartwick J, Barki H. 1994. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly 18(1): 59-82.
21. Hebel M. 2000. Human values and the management of technological change. Cognition, Technology & Work 2(2): 106-115.
22. Humphrey WS. 1988. The software engineering process: definition and scope. In Proceedings of the 4th International Software Process Workshop on Representing and Enacting the Software Process, 11-13 May 1988, Devon UK. Information Systems: Amsterdam; 13-16.
23. Jiang JJ, Klein G. 1997. Information system evaluation by system typology. Journal of Systems and Software 37(3): 181-186.
24. Juran JM. 1988. Juran on Planning for Quality. Free Press: New York.
25. Kanungo S. 1998. An empirical study of organizational culture and network-based computer use. Computers in Human Behavior 14(1): 79-91.
26. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71-79.
27. Kelly GA. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols 1-2. Norton: New York.
28. Kettinger WJ, Lee CC. 1997. Pragmatic perspectives on the measurement of information systems service quality. MIS Quarterly 21(2): 223-240.
29. Lee A. 1999. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly 23(1): 29-33.
30. Lee J, Kim S. 1992. The relationship between procedural formalization in MIS development and MIS success: a contingent analysis. Information & Management 22(2): 89-111.
31. Lu H, Wang J. 1997. The relationships between management styles, user participation, and system success over MIS growth stages. Information & Management 32(4): 203-213.
32. Markus ML, Keil M. 1994. If we build it, they will come: designing information systems that people want to use. Sloan Management Review 35(4): 11-25.
33. Markus ML, Lee AS. 1999. Special issue on intensive research in information systems: using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology. Foreword. MIS Quarterly 23(1): 35-38.
34. Morgando EM, Reinhard N, Watson RT. 1995. Extending the analysis of key issues in information technology management. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands, December; 13-16.
35. Naveh E, Halevy A. 2000. A hierarchical framework for a quality information system. Total Quality Management 11(1): 87-111.
36. Orr K. 1998. Data quality and systems theroy. Communications of the ACM 41(2): 66-71.
37. Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan CB. 1997. Measuring information systems service quality: concerns for a complete canvas. MIS Quarterly 21(2): 209-221.
38. Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N. 1997. Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM 40(7): 89-97.
39. Rivard E, Kaiser K. 1989. The benefit of quality IS. Datamation 35(2): 53-56.
40. Sage AP. 1977. Methodology for Large-Scale Systems. McGraw-Hill: New York.
41. Stylianou AC, Kumar RL. 2000. An integrative framework for IS quality management. Communications of the ACM 43(9): 99-104.
42. Swanson EB. 1997. Maintaining IS quality. Information and Software Technology 39(12): 845-850.
43. Truex DP, Baskerville R, Kline H. 1999. Growing systems in emergent organizations. Communications of the ACM 42(8): 117-123.
44. Umpleby SA. 1990. The science of cybernetics and the cybernetics of science. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 21:109-121.
45. Van Dyke TP, Kappelman LA, Prybutok VR. 1997. Measuring information systems service quality: concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. MIS Quarterly 21(2): 195-208.
46. Venkatesh V. 1999. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 23(2): 239-260.
47. Weick K. 1984. Theoretical assumptions and research methodology selection. In The Information Systems Research Challenge Proceedings, McFarlan FW (ed.). Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
48. Weill P, Vitale M. 1999. Assessing the health of an information systems applications portfolio: an example from process manufacturing. MIS Quarterly 23(4): 601-624.
49. Winter SJ, Chudoba KM, Gutek BA. 1998. Attitudes toward computers: when do they predict computer use? Information & Management 34(5): 275-284.
50. Yoon Y, Guimaraes T, O Neal Q. 1995. Exploring the factors associated with expert systems success. MIS Quarterly 19(1): 83-106.
51. Zahedi F. 1998. Quality information systems: a unifying framework. International Journal of Technology Management 16(4-6): 449-465.