Organizational Culture and Employees' Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Study

Information Resources Management Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 42-58

  Sheng, YiHua ^b   Pearson, J Michael ^b   Crosby, Leon ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer self efficacy; Information technology; Organizational culture

Indexed keywords

PERSONNEL TRAINING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SELF EFFICACY;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0142007787     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2003070103     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. & Stair, R. M. (2000). The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: An empirical assessment, Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 418-430.
2. Al-Khalifa, K. N. & Aspinwall, E. M. (2000). Using the competing values framework to identify the ideal profile for TQM: A UK perspective. International Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2(1-7), 1024-1040.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
5. Bates, K., Amundson, S., Scnroeder, R. & Morris, W. (1995). The crucial inter-relationship between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture. Management Science, 41(10) 1565-1580.
6. Bennett, R. H. III, Fadil, P. A. & Greenwood, R. T. (1994). Culture alignment in response to strategic organizational change: New considerations for a change framework. Journal of Managerial Issues, VI(4), 474-490.
7. Burkhardt, M. E. & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104-127.
8. Cebrera, A., Cabrera, E. F. & Barajas, S. (2001). The key to organizational culture in a multi-system view of technology-driven change. International Journal of Information Management, 21(2), 245-261.
9. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysts for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
11. Conger, A.J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35-46.
12. Detert, J. R. & Schroeder, R. G. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 850-863.
13. Gardner, W. L. III & Rozell, E. J. (2000). Computer efficacy: Determinants, consequences, and malleability. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), 109-136.
14. Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
15. Gist, M.E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891.
16. Glaser, S. R. & Zamanou, S. (1987). Measuring and interpreting organizational culture. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(2), 173-198.
17. Hackman, R. J. & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 309-342.
18. Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309-321.
19. Henry, J. W. & Stone, R. W. (1999). The impacts of end-user gender, education, performance, and system use on computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Southern Business Review, 25(1), 10-16.
20. Hoffman, N. & Klepper, R. (2000). Assimilating new technologies: The role of organizational culture. Information System Management, 17(3), 36-42.
21. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Horst, P. (1996). Psychological Measurement and Prediction. Belmaon, CA: Wadsworth.
23. Karl, K. A., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., & Martocchio, J. J. (1993). The impact of feedback and self-efficacy on performance in training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 379-394.
24. Kim, P. S., Pindur, W. & Reynolds, K. (1995). Creating a new organizational culture: The key to total quality management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(4), 67-709.
25. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, (March-April), 59-67.
26. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C. & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241-250.
27. McNabb, D. E. & Sepic, F. T. (1995). Culture, climate, and total quality management: Measuring readiness for change. Public Productivity & Management Review, 18(4), 369-385.
28. Orlikowski, W. & Hoffman, J.D. (1997). An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review, 38(2), 11-21.
29. Orlikowski, W. (1996). Improvisational organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63-92.
30. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
31. Shadur, M. A., Kienzle, R. & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement. Group and Organization Management, 24(4), 479-503.
32. Stock, G. E. & McDermott, C. M. (2000). Implementing advanced manufacturing technology: The role of organizational culture. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 41(3), 66-71.
33. Tesluk, P. E., Vance, R. J. & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Examining employee involvement in the context of participative work environments. Group and Organization Management, 24(3), 271-299.
34. Tubbs, S. (1994). The historical roots of self-managing work teams in the Twentieth Century: An annotated bibliography. In Boyerlein, M. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
35. Turban, E., McLean, E. & Wetherbe, J. (2002). Information Technology Management: Transforming Business in the Digital Economy. (3rd ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Yeung, A. K., Brockbank, J.W. & Ulrich, D.O. (1991). Organizational culture and human resource practices: An empirical assessment. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 59-81.
37. Zamanou, S. & Glaser, S. A. (1994). Moving Toward Participation an Involvement. Group & Organization Management, 19(4), 475-501.
38. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
39. Wayne, A., Mooney, W. & Seldon, D. H. Culture change - Empowerment at Sweetheart Cup Company Inc., Bakery division. Hospital Material Management Quarterly, 21(1), 53-58.
40. Wixom, B. H. & Watson, H. J. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success. MS Quarterly, 25(1), 17-41.