Boundary organisations in science: From discourse to construction

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 235-238

  Hellström, Tomas ^a   Jacob, Merle ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0141975199     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154303781780371     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Etzkowitz, H, and L Leydesdorff (editors) (1997), Universities in the Global Economy: a Triple Helix of university industry government relations (Cassell, London).
2. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scott and M Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: science and research in contemporary societies (Sage, London).
3. Gieryn, T (1983), "Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists", American Sociological Review, 48, pages 781-795.
4. Guston, D (1999), "Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization", Social Studies of Science, 29(1), pages 87-111.
5. Jasanoff, S (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA).
6. Moore, K (1996), "Organizing integrity: American science and the creation of public interest organizations, 1955-1975", American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), pages 1592-1627.
7. Shove, E, and A Rip (2000) "Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science", Science and Public Policy, 27, pages 175-182.
8. Star, S L, and J R Griesemer (1989), "Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39", Social Studies of Science, 19(3), pages 387-420.