Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 121-126

  Khvoles, Roza ^a   Freeman, Sharon ^a   Sohmer, Haim ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Animal experimentation; Cochlear amplifier; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GUINEA PIG; INSTRUMENTATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; RAT; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; GUINEA PIGS; MICE; RABBITS; RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032994033     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073013     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography–Practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–82
2. Harris F P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 594–600
3. Moulin A, Bera J-C, Collet L. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1994; 33: 305–326
4. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587–1607
5. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662–2682
6. Mills D M, Norton S J, Rubel E W. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2108–2122
7. Freeman S, Goitein K, Attias J, Furst M, Sohmer H. Effect of hypoxemia and ethacrynic acid on ABR and distortion product emission thresholds. J Neurol Sci 1995; 131: 21–29
8. Wilson J P. Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate. Hear Res 1980; 2: 527–532
9. Sims M H, Roger R K, Thelin J W. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in dogs. Progr Vet Neurol 1994; 5: 49–56
10. Ueda H, Hattori T, Sawaki M, Niwa H, Yanagita N. The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 1992; 62: 199–205
11. Ueda H, Yamamoto Y, Arai M, Saito I, Nakata S. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: a comparison between responses from human and guinea pigs. Nippon-Jibinkoka-Gakkai-Kaiho 1993; 96: 2065–2072
12. Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Elbez M, Erming M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3012–3020
13. Hilger A W, Furness D N, Wilson J P. The possible relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and organ of Corti irregularities in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1995; 84: 1–11
14. Aran J M, Erre J P, Avan P. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea-pigs: effects of gentamicin. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 267–271
15. Khvoles R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat. Hear Res 1996; 97: 120–126
16. Sichel J-Y, Plotnik M, Cherny L, Elidan J, Sohmer H. A unique animal for auditory research. J Bas Clin Phys Pharm 1997; 8: 206
17. Wada H, Ohyama K, Kobayashi T, Koike T, Noguchi S. Effect of middle ear on otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1995; 34: 161–176
18. Khvoles R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Development of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in the neonatal rat. Audiol Neurootol 1998; 3: 40–53
19. Geal-Dor M, Khvoles R, Sohmer H. Cooling induces a decrease in middle ear compliance. J Bas Clin Physiol Pharm 1997; 8: 127–132
20. Khvoles R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Effect of temperature on the transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rat. Audiol Neurootol, 1998, in press