Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat

Hearing Research

Volumn 97, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 120-126

  Khvoles, Roza ^a,b   Freeman, Sharon ^b   Sohmer, Haim ^b  

^a Center of Audiology and Hearing Rehabilitation   (Georgia)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Animal; Evoked; Otoacoustic emission; Rat; Transient

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DEATH; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; GUINEA PIGS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RATS, WISTAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030219932     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00072-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Elbez M., Erming M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;3012-3020.
2. Bonfils P., Uziel A. Clinical applications of evoked acoustic emissions: results in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98:1989;326-331.
3. Bray P., Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br. J. Audiol. 21:1987;191-204.
4. Fernandez C. Dimensions of the cochlea (guinea pig). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24:1952;519-523.
5. Hardy M. The length of the organ of Corti in man. Am. J. Anat. 62:1938;291-311.
6. Henley C.M. III, Owings M.H., Stagner B.B., Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Postnatal development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in pigmented rat. Hear. Res. 43:1989;141-148.
7. Hilger A.W., Furness D.N., Wilson J.P. The possible relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and organ of Corti irregularities in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 84:1995;1-11.
8. Long G.R., Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1988;1343-1353.
9. Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Probst R., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear. Res. 28:1987;173-189.
10. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear. Res. 28:1987;191-208.
11. Ohyama K., Wada H., Kobayashi T., Takasaka T. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 56:1991;111-121.
12. Penner M.J., Glotzbach L., Huang T. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: measurement and data. Hear. Res. 68:1993;229-237.
13. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;2027-2067.
14. Reshef (Haran) I., Attias J., Furst M. Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Br. J. Audiol. 27:1993;387-395.
15. Roth B., Bruns V. Postnatal development of the rat organ of Corti. I. General morphology, basilar membrane, tectorial membrane and border cells. Anat. Embryol. 185:1992;559-569.
16. Smurzynski J., Kim D.O. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults. Hear. Res. 58:1992;227-240.
17. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear. Res. 71:1993;170-182.
18. Ueda H., Hattori T., Sawaki M., Niwa H., Yanagita N. The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 62:1992;199-205.
19. Ueda H., Yamamoto Y., Arai M., Saito I., Nakata S. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: a comparison between responses from human and guinea pigs. Nippon-Jibinkoka-Gakkai-Kaiho. 96:1993;2065-2072.
20. Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992a;1587-1607.
21. Whitehead M.L., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II. Differential physiological vulnerability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992b;2662-2682.
22. Zwicker E., Manley G. Acoustical responses and suppression period patterns in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 4:1981;43-52.