Argument quality and cultural difference

Argumentation

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 183-201

  Siegel, Harvey ^a  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Argument quality; Cultural difference; Epistemology; Normativity; Particularity; Power; Relativism; Rhetoric; Transcendence; Transcultural normative reach; Universality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141904824     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026466310894     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adler, J.: 1997a, 'Fallacies Not Fallacious: Not!', Philosophy and Rhetoric 30, 333-350.
2. Adler, J.: 1997b, 'Reply by Reptition and Reminder', Philosophy and Rhetoric 30, 367-375.
3. Baynes, K., J. Bohman and T. McCarthy (eds.): 1987, After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Benhabib, S.: 1992, Situation the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York: Routledge.
5. Biro, J., and H. Siegel: 1992, 'Normativity, Argumentation, and an Epistemic Theory of Fallacies', in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Argumentation Illuminated: Selected Papers from the 1990 International Conference on Argumentation, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 85-103.
6. Carr, W.: 1995, 'Education and Democracy: Confronting the Postmodernist Challenge', Journal of Philosophy of Education 29, 75-91.
7. Cherwitz, R. A. and J. W. Hikins (eds.): 1995, The Role of Argument in the Postmodern World and Beyond, Argumentation 9.
8. Combs, S. C.: 1995, 'The Evocativeness Standard for Argument Quality', in Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C. A. Willard (eds), Perspectives and Approaches: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 439-451.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, and F. S. Henkemans et al.: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Ennis, R. H.: 1998, 'Is Critical Thinking Culturally Biased?', Teaching Philosophy 21, 15-33.
11. Feldman, R.: 1994, 'Good Arguments', in F. F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, Lanham, MD: Roman and Littefield, pp. 159-188.
12. Fullinwider, R.: 1991, 'Multicultural Education', Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy, vol. 11, #3, 12-14.
13. Gelman, R. and Gallistel, C. R.: 1978, The Child's Understanding of Number, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Goldberg, D. T.: 1994, 'Introduction: Multicultural Conditions', in D. T. Goldberg (ed.), Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader, Oxfrod: Blackwell, pp. 1-41.
15. Lumer, C.: 1991, 'Structure and Function of Argumentations - An Epistemological Approach to Determining Criteria for the Validity and Adequacy of Argumentations', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, vol. 1A, SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 98-107.
16. Lyotard, J.-F.: 1987, 'The Postmodern Condition', reprinted in Baynes, Bohman and McCarthy, pp. 73-94.
17. MacIntyre, A.: 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
18. MacIntyre, A.: 1989, 'Relativism, Power, and Philosophy', reprinted in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 182-204.
19. Originally published in 1985, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, pp. 5-22.
20. Moshman, D., J. A. Glover, and R. H. Bruning: 1987, Developmental Psychology: A Topical Approach, Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
21. Nagel, T.: 1986, The View From Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Popper, K. R.: 1970, 'Normal Science and Its Dangers', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-58.
23. Putnam, H.: 1990, Realism with a Human Face, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25. Rorty, R.: 1982, Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Rorty, R.: 1989, 'Solidarity or Objectivity?', in Michael Krausz, ed., Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 35-50.
27. Scheffler, I.: 1995, Teachers of My Youth: An American Jewish Experience, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Siegel, H.: 1987, Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
29. Siegel, H.: 1992, 'Justification by Balance', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, 27-46.
30. Siegel, H.: 1995, 'Naturalized Epistemology and "First Philosophy"', Metaphilosophy 26, 46-62.
31. Siegel, H.: 1996, 'Naturalism and the Abandonment of Normativity', in W. O'Donohue and R. Kitchener (eds.), The Philosophy of Psychology, London: Sage, pp. 4-18.
32. Siegel, H.: 1996a, 'Naturalism, Instrumental Rationality, and the Normativity of Epistemology', Proto Sociology 8/9, 97-110.
33. Siegel, H.: 1997, Rationality Redeemed? Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal, New York: Routledge.
34. Siegel, H.: 1998, 'Multiculturalism and the Possibility of Transcultural Educational and Philosophical Ideals', The School Field 9, 5-31.
35. Siegel, H.: 1998a, 'Knowledge, Truth and Education', in D. Carr (ed.), Knowledge, Truth and Education, London, Routledge, pp. 19-36.
36. Siegel, H.: 1999, 'Relativism', in I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonin, and J. Wolensky (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer (in press).
37. Siegel, H., and J. Biro: 1997, 'Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies', Argumentation 11, 277-292.
38. Simons, H. W., and M. Billig (eds.): 1995, In Search of a Postmodern Rhetoric of Criticism, Argumentation 9.
39. Wreen, M.: 1997, 'Absent Thee from Fallacy a While?', Philosophy and Rhetoric 30, 351-366.