Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies

Argumentation

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 277-292

  Siegel, Harvey ^a   Biro, John ^b  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Epistemic normativity; Epistemology; Fallacies; Methodology; Normativity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646198380     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007799325361     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Adler, J. E.: 1993, 'Critique of An Epistemic Account of Fallacies', Argumentation 7, 263-272.
2. Benson, H.: 1987, 'The Problem of the Elenchus Reconsidered', Ancient Philosophy 7, 67-85.
3. Biro, J.: 1977, 'Rescuing "Begging the Question"', Metaphilosophy 8(4), 257-271.
4. Biro, J. and H. Siegel: 1992, 'Normativity, Argumentation, and An Epistemic Theory of Fallacies', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation Illuminated, SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 81-103.
5. Blair, J. A. and R. H. Johnson: 1993, 'Dissent in Fallacyland, Part 1: Problems with van Eemeren and Grootendorst', in R. E. McKerrow (ed.), Argument and the Postmodern Challenge: Proceedings of the Eighth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA, pp. 188-190.
6. Brickhouse, T. C. and N. D. Smith: 1994, Plato's Socrates, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
8. Feldman, R.: 1994, 'Good Arguments', in F. F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, Roman and Littlefield, pp. 159-188.
9. Fogelin, R. J. and T. J. Duggan: 1987, 'Fallacies', Argumentation 1, 255-262.
10. Hamblin, C. H.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
11. Lumer, C.: 1990, Praktische Argumentationstheorie: Theoretische Grundlagen, Praktische Begrundung und Regeln Wichtiger Argumentationsarten, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany.
12. Lumer, C.: 1991, 'Structure and Function of Argumentations - An Epistemological Approach to Determining Criteria for the Validity and Adequacy of Argumentations', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, vol. 1A, SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 98-107.
13. Széll, G. Á.: 1995, 'Levels of Argumentative Rationality', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Argumentation, SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 300-307.
14. Vlastos, G.: 1971, The Philosophy of Socrates, Anchor Books, New York.
15. Vlastos, G.: 1983, 'The Socratic Elenchus', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 27-58.
16. Walton, D. N.: 1985, Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation and Fallacy, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.