Investigating Models of Social Development Using a Humanoid Robot

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

Volumn 4, Issue , 2003, Pages 2704-2709

  Scassellati, Brian ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBOTS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

HUMANOID ROBOTS;

ROBOT LEARNING;

EID: 0141815627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. D. Premack and G. Woodruff, "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 515-526, 1978.
2. S. Baron-Cohen, Mindblindness. MIT Press, 1995.
3. A. M. Leslie, "ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity," in Mapping the Mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 119-148.
4. D. C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, 1987.
5. D. Premack, ""Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?" revisited," in Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans., R. Byrne and A. Whiten, Eds. Oxford University Press, 1988.
6. D. J. Povinelli and T. M. Preuss, "Theory of mind: evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization," Trends in Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 9, 1995.
7. D. L. Cheney and R. M. Seyfarth, "Reading minds or reading behavior? Tests for a theory of mind in monkeys," in Natural Theories of Mind, A. Whiten, Ed. Blackwell, 1991.
8. J. Fodor, "A theory of the child's theory of mind," Cognition, vol. 44, pp. 283-296, 1992.
9. H. Wimmer and J. Perner, "Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception," Cognition, vol. 13, pp. 103-128, 1983.
10. C. D. Frith and U. Frith, "Interacting minds - a biological basis," Science, vol. 286, pp. 1692-1695, 26 November 1999.
11. S. Carey, "Sources of conceptual change," in Conceptual Development: Piaget's Legacy, E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, and P. H. Miller, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, pp. 293-326.
12. R. Gelman, "First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples," Cognitive Science, vol. 14, pp. 79-106, 1990.
13. J. Perner and B. Lang, "Development of theory of mind and executive control," Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 3, no. 9, September 1999.
14. A. Karmiloff-Smith, E. Klima, U. Bellugi, J. Grant, and S. Baron-Cohen, "Is there a social module? Language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with Williams Syndrome," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 7:2, pp. 196-208, 1995.
15. P. Mundy and M. Sigman, "The theoretical implications of joint attention deficits in autism," Development and Psychopathology, vol. 1, pp. 173-183, 1989.
16. A. Michotte, The perception of causality. Andover, MA: Methuen, 1962.
17. B. Adams, C. Breazeal, R. Brooks, and B. Scassellati, "Humanoid robotics: A new kind of tool," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25-31, July/August 2000.
18. B. Scassellati, "Theory of mind for a humanoid robot," Autonomous Robots, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13-24, 2002.
19. _, "Foundations for a theory of mind for a humanoid robot," Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
20. G. Butterworth, "The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention," in Natural Theories of Mind, A. Whiten, Ed. Blackwell, 1991.
21. J. M. Wolfe, "Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202-238, 1994.
22. G. Butterworth, "Joint attention is based on the facts of embodiment and not on a theory of mind," http://www.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/Philosophy/consciousness/abstracts/Butterworth. html, 2000.
23. B. Webb, "Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? " Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, 2001.