Acoustic communication in Drosophila

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 197-210

  Tauber, Eran ^a   Eberl, Daniel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Chordotonal organ; Courtship song; Drosophila; Hearing

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; COMMUNICATION; COURTSHIP;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEARING; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; TRANSGENICS;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 0141750716     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00135-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (115)

1. Adams M.D., Celniker S.E., Holt R.A., Evans C.A., Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P.G., Scherer S.E., Li P.W., Hoskins R.A., Galle R.F.et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 287:2000;2185-2195.
2. Alt S., Ringo J., Talyn B., Bray W., Dowse H. The period gene controls courtship song cycles in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 56:1998;87-97.
3. Ataka K., Pieribone V.A. A genetically targetable fluorescent probe of channel gating with rapid kinetics. Biophys. J. 82:2002;509-516.
4. Aubin T., Rybak F.B., Moulin B. A simple method for recording low-amplitude sounds: application to the study of the courtship song of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Bioacoustics. 11:2001;51-67.
5. Baker J.D., Esenwa V., Kernan M. Uncoordinated is a novel protein required for the organization and function of ciliogenic centrioles. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12(Suppl.):2001;447a.
6. Barnes P.T., Sullivan L., Villella A. Wing-beat frequency mutants and courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster males. Behav. Genet. 28:1998;137-151.
7. Ben-Arie N., Hassan B.A., Bermingham N.A., Malicki D.M., Armstrong D., Matzuk M., Bellen H.J., Zoghbi H.Y. Functional conservation of atonal and Math1 in the CNS and PNS. Development. 127:2000;1039-1048.
8. Bennet-Clark H.C. Acoustics of insect song. Nature. 234:1971;255-259.
9. Bennet-Clark H.C. A particle velocity microphone for the song of small insects and other acoustic measurements. J. Exp. Biol. 108:1984;459-463.
10. Bermingham N.A., Hassan B.A., Price S.D., Vollrath M.A., Ben-Arie N., Eatock R.A., Bellen H.J., Lysakowski A., Zoghbi H.Y. Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science. 284:1999;1837-1841.
11. Bernstein A.S., Neumann E.K., Hall J.C. Temporal analysis of tone pulses within the courtship songs of two sibling Drosophila species their interspecific hybrid and behavioral mutants of Drosophila melanogaster Diptera Drosophilidae. J. Insect. Behav. 5:1992;15-36.
12. Brand A.H., Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118:1993;401-415.
13. Caldwell J.C., Eberl D.F. Towards a molecular understanding of Drosophila hearing. J. Neurobiol. 53:2002;172-189.
14. Campesan S., Dubrova Y., Hall J.C., Kyriacou C.P. The nonA gene in Drosophila conveys species-specific behavioral characteristics. Genetics. 158:2001;1535-1543.
15. Chen J., Wu W., Cai H., Keng Z. Using a new counting method to study the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Zool. Res. 9:1988;133-139.
16. Chung Y.D., Zhu J., Han Y., Kernan M.J. nompA encodes a PNS-specific, ZP domain protein required to connect mechanosensory dendrites to sensory structures. Neuron. 29:2001;415-428.
17. Cole D. Kinesin-II, coming and going. J. Cell Biol. 147:1999;463-465.
18. Colegrave N., Hollocher H., Hinton K., Ritchie M. The courtship song of African Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 13:2000;143-150.
19. Cowling D.E., Burnet B. Courtship songs and genetic-control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29:1981;924-935.
20. Crossley S.A. Courtship sounds and behavior in the four species of the Drosophila bipectinata complex. Anim. Behav. 34:1986;1146-1159.
21. Crossley S.A. Drosophila pulse and sine songs and their evolution. Behav. Genet. 20:1990;714.
22. Crossley S.A., Bennet-Clark H.C., Evert H.T. Courtship song components affect male and female Drosophila differently. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;827-839.
23. Doi M., Matsuda M., Tomaru M., Matsubayashi H., Oguma Y. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;6714-6719.
24. Eberl D.F. Feeling the vibes: chordotonal mechanisms in insect hearing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9:1999;389-393.
25. Eberl D.F., Duyk G.M., Perrimon N. A genetic screen for mutations that disrupt an auditory response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:1997;14837-14842.
26. Eberl D.F., Hardy R.W., Kernan M.J. Genetically similar transduction mechanisms for touch and hearing in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;5981-5988.
27. Engel J., Wu C.-F. Altered mechanoreceptor response in Drosophila bang-sensitive mutants. J. Comp. Physiol. 175:1994;267-278.
28. Ewing A.W. The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Anim. Behav. 17:1969;555-560.
29. Ewing A.W. The evolution of courtship song in Drosophila. Rev. Comp. Animal. 4:1970;3-8.
30. Ewing A.W. The antenna of Drosophila as a 'love song' receptor. Physiol. Entomol. 3:1978;33-36.
31. Ewing A.W. Complex courtship songs in the Drosophila funebris species group: escape from an evolutionary bottleneck. Anim. Behav. 27:1979a;343-349.
32. Ewing A.W. The neuromuscular basis of courtship song in Drosophila: the role of the direct and axillary wing muscles. J. Comp. Physiol. 130:1979;87-93.
33. Ewing A.W. The role of feedback during singing and flight in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Entomol. 4:1979;329-338.
34. Ewing A.W., Bennet-Clark H.C. The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour. 31:1968;288-301.
35. Ewing A.W., Miyan J.A. Sexual selection sexual isolation and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Anim. Behav. 34:1986;421-429.
36. Field, L.H., Matheson, T., 1998. Chordotonal organs of insects. In: Evans, P.D. (Ed.), Advances in Insect Physiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 1-228.
37. Fritzsch B., Beisel K., Bermingham N. Developmental evolutionary biology of the vertebrate ear: conserving mechanoelectric transduction and developmental pathways in diverging morphologies. Neuroreport. 11:2000;R35-R44.
38. Ganetzky B., Wu C.F. Drosophila mutants with opposing effects on nerve excitability: genetic and spatial interactions in repetitive firing. J. Neurophysiol. 47:1982;501-514.
39. Gleason J.M., Ritchie M.G. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution. 52:1998;1493-1500.
40. Gleason J.M., Nuzhdin S.V., Ritchie M.G. Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity. 89:2002;1-6.
41. Göpfert M.C., Robert D. The mechanical basis of Drosophila audition. J. Exp. Biol. 205:2002;1199-1208.
42. Göpfert M.C., Robert D. Motion generation by Drosophila mechanosensory neurons. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:2003;5514-5519.
43. Göpfert M.C., Briegel H., Robert D. Mosquito hearing: sound-induced antennal vibrations in male and female Aedes aegypti. J. Exp. Biol. 202:1999;2727-2738.
44. Gorczyca M., Hall J.C. The INSECTAVOX, an integrated device for recording and amplifying courtship songs. Dros. Inform. Serv. 66:1987;157-160.
45. Greenacre M.L.G.R.M., Byrne B.C., Kyriacou C.P. Female song preference and the period gene in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 23:1993;85-90.
46. Griffith L.C., Verselis L.M., Aitken K.M., Kyriacou C.P., Danho W., Greenspan R.J. Inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in Drosophila disrupts behavioral plasticity. Neuron. 10:1993;501-509.
47. Gupta B.P., Rodrigues V. Atonal is a proneural gene for a subset of olfactory sense organs in Drosophila. Genes Cells. 2:1997;225-233.
48. Haccou, P., Meelis, E., 1992. Statistical Analysis of Behavioural Data: An Approach Based on Time-structured Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 396 pp.
49. Han Y.-G., Kernan M. NOMPB, the Drosophila homolog of an intraflagellar transport (IFT) protein, is required for differentiation of ciliated sensory neurons but not for spermatogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12(Suppl.):2001;445a.
50. Hassan B.A., Bellen H.J. Doing the MATH: is the mouse a good model for fly development? Genes Dev. 14:2000;1852-1865.
51. Haycraft C., Swoboda P., Taulman P., Thomas J., Yoder B. The C. elegans homolog of the murine cystic kidney disease gene Tg737 functions in a ciliogenic pathway and is disrupted in osm-5 mutant worms. Development. 128:2001;1493-1505.
52. Hoikkala A., Hoy R., Kaneshiro Y. High-frequency clicks of Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila species. Anim. Behav. 37:1989;927-934.
53. Hoikkala A., Kaneshiro K.Y., Hoy R. Courtship songs of the picture-winged Drosophila planitibia subgroup species. Anim. Behav. 47:1994;1363-1374.
54. Hoikkala A., Paallysaho S., Aspi J., Lumme J. Localization of genes affecting species differences in male courtship song between Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. Genet. Res. 75:2000;37-45.
55. Horsmann U., Heinzel H.G., Wendler G. The phasic influence of self-generated air current modulations on the locust flight motor. J. Comp. Physiol. 150:1983;427-438.
56. Hotta Y., Benzer S. Genetic dissection of the Drosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 67:1970;1156-1163.
57. Ikeda H., Takabatake I., Sawada N. Variation in courtship sounds among three geographical strains of Drosophila mercatorum. Behav. Genet. 10:1980;361-375.
58. Jacobs H. Mitochondrial deafness. Ann. Med. 29:1997;483-491.
59. Jarman A.P., Sun Y., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Role of the proneural gene, atonal, in formation of Drosophila chordotonal organs and photoreceptors. Development. 121:1995;2019-2030.
60. Kernan M., Cowan D., Zuker C. Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction: mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila. Neuron. 12:1994;1195-1206.
61. Konopka R.J., Benzer S. Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68:1971;2112-2116.
62. Kulkarni S.J., Hall J.C. Behavioral and cytogenetic analysis of the cacophony courtship song mutant and interacting genetic variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 115:1987;461-475.
63. Kulkarni S.J., Steinlauf A.F., Hall J.C. The dissonance mutant of courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster: isolation. Genetics. 118:1988;267-285.
64. Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C. Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male's courtship song. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:1980;6729-6733.
65. Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C. The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 30:1982;794-801.
66. Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C. Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour in Drosophila. Nature. 308:1984;62-65.
67. Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C. Interspecific genetic control of courtship song production and reception in Drosophila. Science. 232:1986;494-497.
68. Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C. Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship song rhythms. Anim. Behav. 37:1989;850-859.
69. Lakovaara S., Hoikkala A. Analysis of the male courtship sounds of certain species of the Drosophila virilis group. Aquilo. Ser. Zool. 20:1979;94-99.
70. Levi R., Camhi J.M. Population vector coding by the giant interneurons of the cockroach. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;3822-3829.
71. Martin J.R., Raabe T., Heisenberg M. Central complex substructures are required for the maintenance of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 185:1999;277-288.
72. Miller D.D., Goldstein R.B., Patty R.A. Semispecies of Drosophila athabasca distinguishable by male courtship sounds. Evolution. 29:1975;531-544.
73. Moran, C.N., 2002. Molecular and cellular analysis of Drosophila melanogaster lovesong. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Leicester, Leicester.
74. Paillette M., Ikeda H., Jallon J.M. A new acoustic signal of the fruit-flies Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Bioacoustics. 3:1991;247-254.
75. Pak W.L., Grossfield J., Arnold K.S. Mutants of the visual pathway of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 227:1970;518-520.
76. Pazour G.J., Dickert B.L., Vucica Y., Seeley E.S., Rosenbaum J.L., Witman G.B., Cole D.G. Chlamydomonas IFT88 and its mouse homologue, polycystic kidney disease gene Tg737 are required for assembly of cilia and flagella. J. Cell Biol. 151:2000;709-718.
77. Peixoto A.A., Hall J.C. Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the courtship song of Drosophila. Genetics. 148:1998;827-838.
78. Rendahl K.G., Hall J.C. Temporally manipulated rescue of visual and courtship abnormalities caused by a nonA mutation in Drosophila. J. Neurogenet. 10:1996;247-256.
79. Rendahl K.G., Jones K.R., Kulkarni S.J., Bagully S.H., Hall J.C. The dissonance mutation at the no-on-transient-A locus of D. melanogaster: genetic control of courtship song and visual behaviors by a protein with putative RNA-binding motifs. J. Neurosci. 12:1992;390-407.
80. Ritchie M.G., Kyriacou C.P. Genetic variability of courtship song in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 48:1994;425-434.
81. Ritchie M.G., Kyriacou C.P. Artificial selection for a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 52:1996;603-611.
82. Ritchie M.G., Yate V.H., Kyriacou C.P. Genetic variability of the interpulse interval of courtship song among some European populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity. 72:1994;459-464.
83. Ritchie M.G., Townhill R.M., Hoikkala A. Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56:1998;713-717.
84. Ritchie M.G., Halsey E.J., Gleason J.M. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim. Behav. 58:1999;649-657.
85. Ritchie M.G., Saarikettu M., Livingstone S., Hoikkala A. Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution. 55:2001;721-727.
86. von Schilcher F. The behavior of cacophony, a courtship song mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Biol. 17:1976;187-196.
87. von Schilcher F. The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24:1976a;622-625.
88. von Schilcher F. The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24:1976;18-26.
89. von Schilcher F. A mutation which changes courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 7:1977;251-259.
90. Shimada I., Kawazoe Y., Hara H. A temporal model of animal behavior based on a fractality in the feeding of Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Cybern. 68:1993;477-481.
91. Shorey H.H. The nature of the sound produced by Drosophila melanogaster during courtship. Science. 137:1962;677-678.
92. Siegel M.S., Isacoff E.Y. A genetically encoded optical probe of membrane voltage. Neuron. 19:1997;735-741.
93. Smith L.A., Wang X., Peixoto A.A., Neumann E.K., Hall L.M., Hall J.C. A Drosophila calcium channel alpha1 subunit gene maps to a genetic locus associated with behavioral and visual defects. J. Neurosci. 16:1996;7868-7879.
94. Smith L.A., Peixoto A.A., Kramer E.M., Villella A., Hall J.C. Courtship and visual defects of cacophony mutants reveal functional complexity of a calcium-channel alpha1 subunit in Drosophila. Genetics. 149:1998;1407-1426.
95. Tauber E., Eberl D.F. Song production in auditory mutants of Drosophila: the role of sensory feedback. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 187:2001;341-348.
96. Tauber E., Eberl D.F. The effect of male competition on the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Behav. 15:2002;109-120.
97. Todi, S.V., Sharma, Y., Eberl, D.F., in press. Anatomical and molecular design of the Drosophila antenna as a flagellar auditory organ. Microsc. Res. Tech.
98. Toivonen J.M., O'Dell K.M.C., Petit N., Irvine S.C., Knight G.K., Lehtonen M., Longmuir M., Luoto K., Touraille S., Wang Z.et al. technical knockout, a Drosophila model of mitochondrial deafness. Genetics. 159:2001;241-254.
99. Tomaru M., Oguma Y. Differences in courtship song in the species of the Drosophila auraria complex. Anim. Behav. 47:1994a;133-140.
100. Tomaru M., Oguma Y. Genetic basis and evolution of species-specific courtship song in the Drosophila auraria complex. Genet. Res. 63:1994;11-17.
101. Tomaru M., Matsubayashi H., Oguma Y. Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship song elicit female rejection in Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;905-914.
102. Tomaru M., Doi M., Higuchi H., Oguma Y. Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. sechellia, but not in D. sechellia. Evolution. 54:2000;1286-1294.
103. Uga S., Kuwabara M. On the fine structure of the chordotonal sensillum in antenna of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo). 14:1965;173-181.
104. Villella A., Hall J.C. Courtship anomalies caused by doublesex mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 143:1996;331-344.
105. Villella A., Gailey Donald A., Berwald B., Ohshima S., Barnes Phillip T., Hall Jeffrey C. Extended reproductive roles of the fruitless gene in Drosophila melanogaster revealed by behavioral analysis of new fru mutants. Genetics. 147:1997;1107-1130.
106. Wang V., Hassan B., Bellen H., Zoghbi H. Drosophila atonal fully rescues the phenotype of Math1 null mice: new functions evolve in new cellular contexts. Curr. Biol. 17:2002;1611-1616.
107. Wheeler D.A., Fields W.L., Hall J.C. Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship songs Drosophila melanogaster Drosophila simulans and their interspecific hybrid. Behav. Genet. 18:1988;675-704.
108. Wheeler D.A., Kulkarni S.J., Gailey D.A., Hall J.C. Spectral analysis of courtship songs in behavioral mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 19:1989;503-528.
109. Wheeler D.A., Kyriacou C.P., Greenacre M.L., Yu Q., Rutila J.E., Rosbash M., Hall J.C. Molecular transfer of a species-specific behavior from Drosophila simulans to Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 251:1991;1082-1085.
110. White B.H., Osterwalder T.P., Yoon K.S., Joiner W.J., Whim M.D., Kaczmarek L.K., Keshishian H. Targeted attenuation of electrical activity in Drosophila using a genetically modified K(+) channel. Neuron. 31:2001;699-711.
111. Williams M.A., Blouin A.G., Noor M.A. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity. 86:2001;68-77.
112. Wolf, H., 1991. Sensory feedback in locust flight patterning. In: Armstrong, D., Bush, B. (Eds.), Locomotor Neural Mechanisms in Arthropods and Vertebrates. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 134-147.
113. Yager D.D. Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47:1999;380-400.
114. Yamamoto D., Jallon J.-M., Komatsu A. Genetic dissection of sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:1997;551-585.
115. Yu Q., Colot H.V., Kyriacou C.P., Hall J.C., Rosbash M. Behaviour modification by in vitro mutagenesis of a variable region within the period gene of Drosophila. Nature. 326:1987;765-769.