Ethics: "Life before birth" and moral complexity in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida

Clinics in Perinatology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 449-464

  Bliton, Mark J ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; FEMALE; FETUS SURGERY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MATERNAL FETAL SURGERY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; REVIEW; SPINA BIFIDA; UTERUS SURGERY;

EID: 0141731365     PISSN: 00955108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-5108(03)00046-0     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ruddick W, Wilcox W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Cent Rep 1982;12(5):10.
2. Callahan D. How technology is reframing the abortion debate. Hastings Cent Rep 1986;16(1): 33-42.
3. Parens E, Asch A, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
4. Morgan LM. Fetal relationality in feminist philosophy: an anthropological critique. Hypatia 1996;11:59.
5. Landsman G. Does God give special kids to special parents? Personhood and the child with disabilities as gift and giver. In: Layne LL, editor. Transformative motherhood: on giving and getting in a consumer culture. New York: New York University Press; 1999. p. 134.
6. Casper MJ. At the margins of humanity: fetal positions in science and medicine. Science, Technology & Human Values 1994;19(3):308.
7. Teays W. Fetal experimentation: the question of ownership and exploitation. In: Teays W, Purdy LM, editors. Bioethics, justice and health care. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2000. p. 311.
8. Overall C. Ethics and human reproduction: a feminist analysis. Boston: Allen & Unwin; 1987. p. 50.
9. Parsi K. Metaphorical imagination: the moral and legal status of fetuses and embryos. DePaul Journal of Health Care and Law 1999;2:725.
10. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. State children's health insurance program. United States Government Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):42 Part 457 at §457.10.
11. Lenow JL. The fetus as patient: emerging rights as a person? Am J Law Med 1983;9(1):1-29.
12. Heriot MJ. Fetal rights versus the female body: contested domains. Med Anthropol Quarterly 1996;10(2):176-94.
13. Kitcher P. The lives to come: the genetic revolution and human possibilities. New York: Touchstone; 1997. p. 226.
14. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall R, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA 1999;282(19):1819-25.
15. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, et al. Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 1999;282(19):1826-31.
16. Fleischman AR, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The physician's moral obligation to the pregnant woman, the fetus and the child. Seminars in Perinatology 1998;22(3):184-8.
17. Lyerly AD, Gates EA, Cefalo RC, Sugarman J. Toward the ethical evaluation and use of maternal-fetal surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98(4):689-97.
18. Bliton MJ. Imagining a fetus: insights from talking with pregnant women about their decision to undergo open-uterine fetal surgery. In: Toombs SK, editor. Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. Volume 68 in the Philosophy and Medicine series. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 393-415.
19. Zaner RM. Ethics and the clinical encounter. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1988.
20. Bliton MJ, Finder SG. Strange, but not stranger: the peculiar visage of philosophy in clinical ethics consultation. Human Studies 1999;22:69-97.
21. Bliton MJ, Zaner RM. Over the cutting edge: how ethics consultation illuminates the moral complexity of open-uterine fetal repair of spina bifida and patient's decision making. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 2001;12(4):346-60.
22. Evans MI, Johnson MP, Isada NB, Holzgreve W. Coercion for fetal therapy? In: Beller FK, Weir RF, editors. The beginning of human life. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. p. 319-24.
23. Fletcher JC, Jonsen AR. Ethical considerations in fetal treatment. In: Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, editors. The unborn patient. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991. p. 16.
24. Cefalo RC. Edges of life: the consequences of prenatal assessment, diagnosis and treatment. In: Wildes KW, Abel F, Harvey JC, editors. Birth, suffering, and death: Catholic perspectives at the edges of life. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992. p. 27-9.
25. Robertson JA. The right to procreate and in utero fetal therapy. J Leg Med 1982;3(3):333-66.
26. Harris LH. Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: gender and equality in perinatal ethics. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(5):786-91.
27. Department of Health and Human Services. United States Government Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 45 Part 46 Subpart B at § 46.201-205.
28. Mattingly SS. The maternal-fetal dyad: exploring the two patient obstetric model. Hastings Cent Rep 1992;22(1):16.
29. Zaner RM. Integrity and vulnerability in clinical medicine: the dialectic of appeal and response. In: Kemp P, Rendtorff J, Johnsen NM, editors. Bioethics and biolaw. Volume II: four ethical principles. Second International Conference on Bioethics and Biolaw in Nature and Culture, Copenhagen, Denmark, April, 1998. Copenhagen (Denmark): Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law; 2000. p. 123-40.
30. Tulipan N, Sutton LN, Bruner JP. The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38(1):27-33.
31. Harrison MR. The fetus with a diaphragmatic hernia: pathophysiology, natural history and surgical management. In: Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, editors. The unborn patient. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991. p. 309.
32. Kolder VE, Gallagher J, Parsons MT. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. NEJM 1987; 316(19):1192-6.
33. Evans MI, Robertson JA, Fletcher JC. Legal and ethical issues in fetal therapy. In: Lin C-C, Verp MS, Sabbagha RE, editors. The high risk fetus: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993. p. 627-39.
34. Barclay WR, McCormick RA, Sidbury JB, et al. The ethics of in utero surgery. JAMA 1981; 246(14):1550-5 [see especially McCormick on p. 1552].
35. Biggio Jr JR, Owen J, Wenstrom KD, et al. Can prenatal ultrasound findings predict ambulatory status in fetuses with open spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185(5):1016-20.
36. Rintoul NE, Sutton LN, Hubbard AM, et al. A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics 2002; 109(3):409-13.
37. Bannister C. The case for and against intrauterine repair for myelomeningoceles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;92:109-13.
38. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Perinatal ethics: a practical analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:442.
39. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
40. Knopoff KA. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery? California Law Rev 1991; 79(2):499-540.
41. Steinbock B. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy. Albany Law Rev 1994; 57(3):781-93.
42. Flagler E, Baylis F, Rodgers S. Bioethics for clinicians: 12. Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant women: rethinking "maternal-fetal conflicts". Canadian Medical Association Journal 1996;156(12):1729-32.
43. Lyerly AD, Mahowald MB. Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise. Health Care Anal 2001;9(2):151-65.
44. Solomon RC. Reflections on the meaning of (fetal) life. In: Bondeson WB, Engelhardt Jr HT, et al, editors. Abortion and the status of the fetus. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co; 1983. p. 220.
45. Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele, Protocol. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Rockville (MD): Fetal Surgery Units Group; 2003.
46. Lu GC, Steinhauer J, Ramsey PS, et al. Lethal pulmonary hypoplasia after in-utero myelomeningocele repair. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98(4):698-700.
47. Shannon TA. Fetal status: sources and implications. J Med Philos 1997;22(5):415-22.
48. Strong C. The moral statue of preembryos, embryos, fetuses and infants. J Med Philos 1997; 22(5):457-78.
49. Harman E. Creation ethics: the moral status of early fetuses and the ethics of abortion. Philos Public Aff 1999;28(4):310-24.
50. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethical considerations. In: Harrison MR, Evans MI, Adzick NS, Holzgreve W, editors. The unborn patient: the art and science of fetal therapy. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 21.
51. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethics in fetal medicine. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1999;13(4):493.
52. Layne LL. "True gifts from God." In: Layne LL, editor. Transformative motherhood: on giving and getting in a consumer culture. New York: New York University Press; 1999. p. 167-214.
53. Retsinas J. The impact of prenatal technology upon attitudes toward disabled infants. Research in the Sociology of Health Care 1991;9:90.
54. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. A comprehensive framework for fetal research and it application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187(1):10-4.
55. Lyerly AD, Mahowald MB. Maternal-fetal surgery for treatment of myelomeningocele. Clin Perinatol 2003;30:155-65.
56. McLone D. Care of the neonate with a myelomeningocele. Ncurosurgery Clin N Am 1999; 9(1):111.
57. Freeman JM. Changing ethical issues in the treatment of spina bifida: a personal odyssey. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 1998;4:305.