|
Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 151-165
|
Maternal-fetal surgery: The fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise
|
Author keywords
Equipoise; Fallacy of abstraction; Fetal patient; Maternal fetal surgery; Myelomeningocele; Pregnant woman; Research ethics; Spina bifida
|
Indexed keywords
ETHICS;
FETUS RISK;
FETUS SURGERY;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
HUMAN;
MENINGOMYELOCELE;
PREGNANCY;
REVIEW;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
RISK FACTOR;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
INVESTIGATIONAL THERAPIES;
MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP;
NONTHERAPEUTIC RESEARCH;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
HUMANS;
MATERNAL WELFARE;
MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONS;
MENINGOMYELOCELE;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SPINAL DYSRAPHISM;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0034845646
PISSN: 10653058
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011326119701 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (32)
|
References (32)
|