Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 9 I, 2003, Pages 1129-1137

  Loewe, Christian ^a   Cejna, Manfred ^a   Schoder, Maria ^a   Loewe Grgurin, Maria ^a   Wolf, Florian ^a   Lammer, Johannes ^a   Thurnher, Siegfried A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM; GADOTERIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BYPASS SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MOVING TABLE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PERIPHERAL ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0141705183     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60526-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mills JL, Wixon CL, Lames DC, Devine J, Westerband A, Hughes JD. The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:273-280.
2. Laundry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, Porter JM. Long-term outcome of revised lower-extremity bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:56-63.
3. Berkowitz HD, Fox AD, Deaton DH. Reversed vein graft stenosis: early diagnosis and management. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15:130-142.
4. Lundell A, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, Hansen F. Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1885; 21:26-34.
5. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:599-604.
6. Ho KYJAM, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AGH, Kitslaar PJEHM, Van Engelshoven JMA. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692.
7. Meaney JFM, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67.
8. TASC Working Group: TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). Management of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). J Vasc Surg 2000; 31(suppl):S1-S290.
9. Watson HR, Belcher G, Horrocks M. Reintervention as a clinical trial end-point after peripheral arterial bypass surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1376-1381.
10. Arnold TE, Kerstein MD. Secondary distal extension of infrainguinal bypass: long-term limb and patient survival. Ann Vasc Surg 2000; 14:450-456.
11. Hoksbergen AWJ, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Ubbink DT, Jacobs MJHM. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of peripheral bypass stenoses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22:282-286.
12. Green RM, Ouriel K, Ricotta JJ, DeWeese JA. Revision of failed infrainguinal bypass graft: principles of management. Surgery 1986; 100:646-654.
13. Roth SM, Bandyk DF. Duplex scanning of lower extremity bypasses, angioplasties and stents. Semin Vasc Surg 1999; 12:275-284.
14. Beidle TR, Brom-Ferral R, Letourneau JG. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:443-448.
15. Idu MM, Buth J, Hop WCJ, Cuypers P, van de Pavoordt EDWM, Tordoir JMH. Vein graft surveillance: is graft revision without angiography justified and what criteria should be used? J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:399-413.
16. Calligaro KD, Syrek JR, Dougherty MJ, Rua I, McAffee-Bennett S, Doerr KJ, et al. Selective use of duplex ultrasound to replace preoperative arteriography for failing arterial vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:89-95.
17. Laundry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, McLafferty RB, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, et al. Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29:270-281.
18. Levy MM, Baum RA, Carpenter JP. Endovasular surgery based solely on non-invasive preprocedural imaging. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28:995-1005.
19. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:45-53.
20. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1139-1144.
21. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995, 165:431-437.
22. Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1993; 187:637-641.
23. Lee HM, Wang Y, Sostman HD, et al. Distal lower extremity arteries: evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1998; 207:505-512.
24. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HCW, van Engelshoven JMA. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 217:105-114.
25. Busch HP, Hoffmann HG, Metzner C, Oettinger W. MR angiography of the lower extremities with an automatic table translation (Mobitrak) compared to i.a. DSA. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999; 170:275-283.
26. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TKF, Hood MN, Miller DL, Czum JM, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: initial practical experiences and future directions of this work-in-progress. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:376-388.
27. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, Espearza-Coss E, Korosec F, Mistretta CA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography -initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:226-272.
28. Leiner T, Ho KYJAM, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JMA. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MobiTrak) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:368-377.
29. Loewe C, Cejna M, Lammer J, Thurnher SA. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:725-732.
30. Bendib K, Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Villard J, Douek P. Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26:1036-1042.
31. Krinsky G, Jacobowitz G, Rofsky N. Gadolinium-enhanced MR. angiography of extraanatomic arterial bypass grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 735-741.
32. Bertschinger K, Cassina PC, Debatin J, Rühm SG. Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:215-220.