A comparative study of aerodynamic function and flexural stiffness of outer tail feathers in birds

Journal of Avian Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 243-250

  Tubaro, Pablo L ^a  

^a MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AERODYNAMICS; AVIFAUNA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; TAIL FEATHER;

ACCIPITRIDAE; AVES; CAPRIMULGIDAE; CORACIIDAE; COTINGIDAE; FREGATIDAE; HIRUNDINIDAE; PHALACROCORACIDAE; TROCHILIDAE; TYRANNIDAE;

EID: 0141683773     PISSN: 09088857     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2003.03084.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. - Nature 299: 818-820.
2. Balmford, A., Jones, I. L. and Thomas, A. L. R. 1994. How to compensate for costly sexually selected tails: the origin of sexually dimorphic wings in long-tailed birds. - Evolution 48: 1062-1070.
3. Bleiweiss, R., Kirsch, J. A. W. and Matheus, J. C. 1997. DNA hybridization evidence for the principal lineages of hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). - Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 325-343.
4. Bonser, R. H. C. 1996. The mechanical properties of feather keratin. - J. Zool. Lond. 239: 477-484.
5. Bonser, R. H. C. and Purslow, P. P. 1995. The Young's modulus of feather keratin. - J. Exp. Biol. 198: 1029-1033.
6. Cleere, N. and Nurney, D. 1998. Nightjars. A guide to nighthars and related nightbirds. - Pica Press, Sussex.
7. Corning, W. R. and Biewener, A. A. 1998. In vivo strains in pigeon flight feather shafts: implications for structural design. - J. Exp. Biol. 201: 3057-3065.
8. Cracraft, J. 1985. Monophyly and the phylogenetic relationships of the pelecaniformes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Auk 102: 834-853.
9. Ennos, A. R., Hickson, J. R. E. and Roberts, A. 1995. Functional morphology of the vanes of the flight feathers of the pigeon Columba livia. - J. Exp. Biol. 198: 1219-1228.
10. Evans, M. R. and Hatchwell, B. J. 1992. An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: II the role of elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 421-427.
11. Evans, M. R. and Thomas, A. L. R. 1992. The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbirds: measuring the cost of a handicap. - Anim. Behav. 43: 337-347.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. - Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
13. Fitzpatrick, S. 1999. Tail length in birds in relation to tail shape, general flight ecology and sexual selection. - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 49-60.
14. Fry, C. H. 2001. Family Coraciidae (rollers). - In: del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. and Sargatal, J. (eds). Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 6. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 342-376.
15. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. - J. Theor. Biol. 144: 517-546.
16. Lanyon, W. E. 1986. A phylogeny of the thirty-three genera in the Empidonax assemblage of tyrant flycatchers. - Am. Mus. Novit. 2846: 1-64.
17. Manning, J. T. 1989. Age-advertisement and the evolution of the peacock's train. - J. Evol. Biol. 2: 379-384.
18. Møller, A. P. 1988. Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. - Nature 332: 640-642.
19. Møller, A. P. 1996. The cost of secondary sexual characters and the evolution of cost-reducing traits. - Ibis 138: 112-119.
20. Møller, A. P. and Hedenström, A. 1999. Comparative evidence for costs of secondary sexual characters: adaptive vane emargination of ornamented feathers in birds. - J. Evol Biol. 12: 296-305.
21. Moreno, E. and Møller, A. P. 1996. Morphological aspects of avian tail movements: a functional approach in Hirundines. - Auk 113: 647-654.
22. Niklas, K. J. 1994. Plant allometry. - University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Norberg, U. M. 1989. Vertebrate flight. - Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
24. Norberg, R. A. 1994. Swallow tail streamer is a mechanical device for self-deflection of tail leading edge, enhancing aerodynamic efficiency and flight manoeuvrability. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257: 227-233.
25. Petrie, M., Halliday, T. and Sanders, C. 1991. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. - Anim. Behav. 41: 323-331.
26. Pryke, S. R., Andersson, S. and Lawes, M. J. 2001. Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. - Evolution 55: 1452-1463.
27. Rutschke, E. 1976. Gross structure in bird feathers. - Proc. 16th Int. Orn. Congr., pp. 414-425.
28. Sheldon, F. H. and Winkler, D. W. 1993. Intergeneric phylogenetic relationships of swallows estimated by DNA-DNA hybridization. - Auk 110: 798-824.
29. Sibley, C. G. and Ahlquist, J. E. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. A study in molecular evolution. - Yale University Press, New Haven.
30. Smith, H. G. and Montgomerie, R. 1991. Sexual selecion and the tail ornaments of North American barn swallows. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 195-201.
31. Thiollay, J. M. 1994. Family Accipitridae (hawks and eagles). - In: del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. and Sargatal, J. (eds). Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 6. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 42-205.
32. Thomas, A. L. R. 1993a. The aerodynamic cost of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can't fly round tight corners. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254: 181-189.
33. Thomas, A. L. R. 1993b. On the aerodynamics of birds' tails. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340: 361-380.
34. Thomas, A. L. R. 1996a. The flight of birds that have wings and a tail: variable geometry expands the envelope of flight performance. - J. Theor. Biol. 183: 237-245.
35. Thomas, A. L. R. 1996b. Why do birds have tails? The tail as a drag reducing flap, and trim control. - J. Theor. Biol. 183: 247-253.
36. Thomas, A. L. R. 1997. On the tails of birds. - BioScience 47: 215-225.
37. Thomas, A. L. R. and Balmford, A. 1995. How natural selection shapes birds' tails. - Am. Nat. 146: 848-868.
38. Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D. and Gosline, J. M. 1976. Mechanical design in organisms. - Princeton University Press, Princeton.
39. Worcester, S. E. 1996. The scaling of the size and stiffness of primary flight feathers. - J. Zool. Lond. 239: 609-624.
40. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. - J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.