A steady-state process resiliency index for nonlinear processes: 1. Analysis

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 20, 2003, Pages 4506-4511

  Solovyev, Boris M ^a   Lewin, Daniel R ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTORS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELIABILITY;

NONLINEAR PROCESSES;

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

DESIGN; NON-LINEAR SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; LINEAR SYSTEM; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; STEADY STATE;

EID: 0141678014     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie020926a     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Luyben, W. L.; Tyreus, B. D.; Luyben, M. L. Plantwide Process Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
2. Seider, W. D.; Seader, J. D.; Lewin, D. R. Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis Analysis and Evaluation; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2003.
3. Skogestad, S.; Morari, M. Effect of Disturbance Direction on Closed-Loop Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 27, 1848.
4. Stanley, G.; Marino-Galarraga, M.; McAvoy, T. J. Shortcut Operability Analysis. 1. The Relative Disturbance Gain. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1985, 24, 1181.
5. Wolff, E. A. Studies on Control of Integrated Plants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Trondheim-NTH, Trondheim, Norway, 1994.
6. Lewin, D. R. A Simple Tool for Disturbance Resiliency Diagnosis and Feedforward Control Design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 13.
7. Cao, Y.; Rossiter, D.; Owens, D. Input Selection for Disturbance Rejection under Manipulated Variable Constraints. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, S403.
8. Solovyev, B. M.; Lewin, D. R. Controllability and Resiliency Analysis for Homogeneous Azeotropic Distillation Columns. In Proceedings of ADCHEM 2000; Elsevier Science: New York, 2000.
9. Seferlis, P.; Grievink, J. Plant Design Based on Economic and Static Controllability Criteria. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design; American Institute of Chemical Engineers: New York, 1999; p 346.
10. Subramanian, S.; Georgakis, C. Steady-state Operability Characteristics of Reactors. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1563.
11. Arbel, A.; Rinard, I. H.; Shinnar, R. Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 4. The Impact of Design on Partial Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 747.
12. Wolfram, S. Mathematica 4: User Manuals; Wolfram Research, Inc.: Champaign, IL, 1999.
13. Loehle, C. Global Optimization V2.1s: User Manuals; Loehle Enterprises: Naperville, IL, 1998.
14. Luyben, W. L. Tradeoffs Between Design and Control in Chemical Reactor Systems. J. Process Control 1993, 3, 17.
15. Ray, W. H. New Approaches to the Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems with Implications for Process Control System Design. In Proceedings of Chemical Process Control 2; United Engineering Trustees: New York, 1982; p 245.
16. Russo, L. P.; Bequette, B. W. Impact of Process Design on the Multiplicity Behavior of a Jacketed Exothermic CSTR. AIChE J. 1995, 41, 135.
17. Bristol, E. H. On a New Measure of Interactions for Multivariable Process Control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1966, AC - 11, 133.