Steady-state operability characteristics of reactors

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 2-7, 2000, Pages 1563-1568

  Subramanian, Sivakumar ^a   Georgakis, Christos ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonlinear systems; Reactors; Steady state operability

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PLANTS; CHEMICAL REACTORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

OPERABILITY INDEX; STEAD STATE OPERABILITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROL SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PROCESS CONTROL; REACTOR; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034661352     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00551-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Anderson, J. S. (1966). A practical problem in dynamic heat transfer. The Chemical Engineer, CE97-CE103.
2. Bahri, P. A., Bandoni, A., & Romagnoli, J. (1996). Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: steady-state open-loop backoff problem. American Institute of Engineering Chemistry Journal, 42, 983-994.
3. Bahri, P. A., Bandoni, J. A., & Romagnoli, J. A. (1997). Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 43, 997-1015.
4. Dimitriadis, V., & Pistikopoulos, E. (1995). Flexibility analysis of dynamic systems. Industrial and Chemistry Engineering Research, 34, 4451-4462.
5. Doedel, E. J. (1998). AUTO 97: Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
6. Downs, J. J. & Ogunnaike, B. (1994). Design for control and operability: an industrial perspective. Foundations of computer aided process design, pp. 115-123, CO, CACHE.
7. Luyben, W. L. (1993). Trade-offs between design and control in chemical reactor systems. Journal of Process Control, 3, 17-41.
8. Morari, M., & Perkins, J. (1994). Design for operations. Foundations of computer aided process design, pp. 105-114, CO, CACHE.
9. Ray, W. H. (1982). New approaches to the dynamics of nonlinear systems with implications for process control system design. In D. E. Seborg, & T. F. Edgar, Chemical Process Control 2 (p. 245). New York: United Engineering Trustees.
10. Russo, L. P., & Bequette, B. W. (1995). Impact of process design on the multiplicity behavior of a jacketted exothermic CSTR. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 41, 135-147.
11. Skogestad, S., & Postlethwaite, I. (1996). Multivariable Feedback Control. New York: Wiley.
12. Subramanian, S., & Georgakis, C. (1999). Operability characteristics of reacting systems, Research progress report 28. Chemical Process Modeling and Control Research Center, Lehigh University.
13. Swaney, R. E., & Grossmann, I. E. (1985). An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I: Formulation and theory. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 31, 621-630.
14. Uztürk, D., & Georgakis, C. (1999). Dynamic operability of processes, Research progress report 28. Chemical Process Modeling and Control Research Center, Lehigh University.
15. Veres, S. M., Kuntsevich, A. V., Vályi, I., Wall, D. S., & Hermsmeyer, S. (1996). Geometric Bounding Toolbox for Matlab™. Edgbaston, UK: The University of Birmingham.
16. Vinson, D. R., & Georgakis, C. (1998). A new measure of process output controllability. In C. Georgakis, DYCOPS-5, 5th IFAC symposium on dynamics and control of process systems (pp. 700-709).
17. Vinson, D. R., & Georgakis, C. (2000). A new measure of process output controllability. Journal of Process Control, 10, 185-194.