Input selection for disturbance rejection under manipulated variable constraints

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL.1, 1997, Pages

  Cao, Yi ^a   Rossiter, Diane ^a   Owens, David ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Control structure selection; Disturbance rejection; Process control

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001590148     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(97)87535-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cao, Y. (1996). Control Structure Selection for Chemical Processes Using Input-output Controllability Analysis, PhD thesis, University of Exeter.
2. Cao, Y. and Biss, D. (1996a). An extension of singular value analysis for assessing manipulated variable constraints, Journal of Process Control 6(1): 37-48.
3. Cao, Y. and Biss, D. (1996b). New screening techniques for choosing manipulated variables, Proceedings of IFAC'96 13th World Congress, Vol. M, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 103-108.
4. Cao, Y. and Rossiter, D. (1996). Input screening method for disturbance rejection, Proceedings of Control'96, Vol. 1, UKACC, IEE Conference Publication, Exeter, UK, pp. 497-502.
5. Cao, Y. and Rossiter, D. (1997). An input pre-screening technique for control structure selection, Comp. Chem. Eng. 21(6): 563-569.
6. Cline, R. E. (1964). Representations for the generalized inverse of a partitioned matrix, Journal of the SIAM 12(3): 588-600.
7. Douglas, J. (1988). Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
8. Johnston, R. D. and Barton, G. W. (1985). Control system development without dynamic simulation, IChemE Symposium Series No. 92 pp. 443-456.
9. Luyben, W. L. (1988). The concept of "eigenstructure" in process control, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 27: 206-208.
10. Morari, M., Grimm, W., Oglesby, M. J. and Prosser, I. D. (1985). Design of resilient processing plants VII - design of energy management system for unstable reactors-new insights, Chemical Engineering Science 40: 187-198.
11. Noble, B. and Daniel, J. W. (1977). Applied Linear Algebra, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
12. Prosys Technology Ltd (1991). SpeedUp User Manuals: Volumes 1 and 2, Issue 5.3.2., version 1.0 edn, Prosys Technology Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
13. Skogestad, S. and Hovd, M. (1990). Use of frequency-dependent RGA for control structure selection, Proceedings of American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, pp. 2133-2139.
14. Skogestad, S. and Morari, M. (1987). Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 26: 2029-2035.
15. Skogestad, S. and Wolff, E. A. (1992). Controllability measures for disturbance rejection, IFAC Workshop on Interactions between Process Design and Process Control, London, England, pp. 23-29.
16. Stanley, G., Marino-Galarraga, M. and McAvoy, T. J. (1985). Shortcut operability analysis. 1. the relative disturbance gain, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 24: 1181-1188.