Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease: Comparative study with conventional ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Diagnostic algorithm

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 186-192

  Pamos, S ^a   Benages, A ^b   Medina, E ^a   Martinez Sanjuan, V ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bile ducts diseases; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DILATATION; BILIARY TRACT CANCER; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DUCT; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0141656290     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1590-8658(03)00027-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Soto J.A. Barish M.A. Yucel E.K. Siegenberg D. Ferrucci J.T. Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Gastroenterology 110 1996 589-597
2. Bret P.M. Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography Endoscopy 29 1997 472-486
3. Barish M.A. Yucel E.K. Ferrucci J.T. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography New Engl J Med 341 1999 258-264
4. Fulcher A.S. Turner M.A. Capps G.W. Zfass A.M. Baker K.M. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: Experience in 300 subjects Radiology 207 1998 21-32
5. Holzknecht N. Gauger J. Sackmann M. Thoeni R.F. Schurig J. Holl J. et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography Radiology 206 1998 657-664
6. Adamek H.E. Albert J. Weitz M. Breer H. Schilling D. Riemann J.F. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction Gut 43 1998 680-683
7. Pamos S. Rivera P. Canelles P. Quiles F. Ort́ E. Cuquerella J. et al. Colangiopancreatograf́a por resonancia magnética (CPRM) frente a colangio-pancreatograf́a retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE): Utilidad diagnóstica Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 1998 174-180
8. Miyazaki T. Yamashita Y. Tsuchigame T. Yamamoto H. Urata J. Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 1996 1297-1303
9. Soto J.A. Barish M.A. Alvarez O. Medina S. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences Radiology 215 2000 737-745
10. Rieger R. Wayand W. Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients Gastrointest Endosc 42 1995 6-12
11. Bilbao M.K. Dotter C.T. Lee T.G. Katon R.M. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases Gastroenterology 70 1976 314-320
12. Dubno B. Debatin J.F. Luboldt W. Schmidt M. Hany T.F. Bauerfeind P. Virtual MR cholangiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 1998 1547-1550
13. Lee M.G. Jeong Y.K. Kim M.H. Lee S.G. Kang E.M. Chien D. et al. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparing single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 1998 1539-1545
14. Reuther G. Kiefer B. Tuchmann A. Cholangiography before biliary surgery: Single-shot MR versus intravenous cholangiography Radiology 198 1996 561-566
15. Regan F. Fradin J. Khazan R. Bohlman M. Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation with MR cholangiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 1996 1441-1445
16. Adamek H.E. Breer H. Riemann J.F. Current role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct and pancreatic diseases Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31 1999 880-883
17. De Lèdinghen V. Lecesne R. Raymond J.M. Gense V. Amouretti M. Drouillard J. et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study Gastrointest Endosc 49 1999 26-31
18. Zidi S.H. Prat F. Le Guen O. Rondeau Y. Rocher L. Fritsch J. et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: Prospective comparison with a reference imaging method Gut 44 1999 118-122
19. Pavone P. Laghi A. Panebianco V. Catalano C. Lobina L. Passariello R. MR cholangiography: Techniques and clinical applications Eur Radiol 8 1998 901-910
20. Yeh T.S. Jan Y.Y. Tseng J.H. Chiu C.T. Chen T.C. Hwang T.L. et al. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings Am J Gastroenterol 95 2000 432-440
21. Zidi S.H. Prat F. Le Guen O. Rondeau Y. Pelletier G. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures Gut 46 2000 103-106
22. Guibaud L. Bret P.M. Reinhold C. Atri M. Barkun A.N. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis with MR cholangiography Radiology 197 1995 109-115
23. Lee M.G. Lee H.J. Kim M.H. Kang E.M. Kim Y.H. Lee S.G. et al. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Radiology 202 1997 663-669
24. Trede M. Rumstadt B. Wendl K. Gaa J. Tesdal K. Lehmann K.J. et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors Ann Surg 226 1997 393-407
25. Johnson P.T. Outwater E.K. Pancreatic carcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: Dynamic MR imaging Radiology 212 1999 213-218
26. Gorelick A.B. Scheiman J.M. Fendrick A.M. Identification of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: At what stage are we? Am J Gastroenterol 93 1998 1995-1996
27. Catalano C. Pavone P. Laghi A. Panebianco V. Scipioni A. Fanelli F. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Combination of MR imaging, MR angiography and MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis and assessment of resectability Eur Radiol. 8 1998 428-434
28. Feldman D.R. Kulling D.P. Kay C.L. Cole D.J. Cunningham J.T. Hawes R.H. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms Ann Surg Oncol 4 1997 634-638
29. Soto J.A. Barish M.A. Yucel E.K. Clarke P. Siegenberg D. Chuttani R. et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique Radiology 196 1995 459-464
30. Schwartz L.H. Coakley F.V. Sun Y. Blumgart L.H. Fong Y. Panicek D.M. Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: Evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 1998 1491-1495
31. Reinhold C. Bret P.M. Guibaud M. Barkun A.N. Genin G. Atri M. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP): Potential clinical applications Radiographics 16 1996 309-320
32. Taourel P. Bret P.M. Reinhold C. Barkun A.N. Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: Diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography Radiology 199 1996 521-527
33. Macaulay S.E. Schulte S.J. Sekijima J.H. Obregon R.G. Simon H.E. Rohrmann C.A. et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique Radiology 196 1995 227-232
34. Yamataka A. Kuwatsuru R. Shima H. Kobayashi H. Lane G. Segawa O. et al. Initial experience with non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A new noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of choledochal cyst in children J Pediatr Surg 32 1997 1560-1562
35. Sugiyama M. Baba M. Atomi Y. Hanaoka H. Mizutani Y. Hachiya J. Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: Value or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography Surgery 123 1998 391-397
36. Tang Y. Yamashita Y. Arakawa A. Namimoto T. Mitsuzaki K. Abe Y. et al. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system: Value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation Radiology 215 2000 81-88
37. Miyazaki T. Yamashita Y. Tang Y. Tsuchigame T. Takahashi M. Sera Y. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 1998 33-37
38. Coakley F.V. Schwartz L.H. Blumgart L.H. Fong Y. Jarnagin W.R. Panicek D.M. Complex postcholecystectomy biliary disorders: preliminary experience with evaluation by means of breath-hold MR cholangiography Radiology 209 1998 141-146
39. Di Fiore F. Savoye-Collet C. Savoye G. Foresier F. Koning F.E. Scotte M. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiographic assessment of a delayed radiation-induced bile duct stricture Dig Liver Dis 33 2001 584-586
40. Yeh T.S. Jan Y.Y. Tseng J.H. Hwang T.L. Jeng L.B. Chen M.F. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in demonstrating major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 86 1999 181-184
41. Barish M. Soto J. Ferrucci J. Magnetic resonance pancreatography Endoscopy 29 1997 487-495
42. Soto J.A. Yucel E.K. Barish M.A. Chuttani R. Ferrucci J.T. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP Radiology 199 1996 91-98
43. Deviere J. Matos C. Cremer M. The impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on ERCP Gastrointest Endosc 50 1999 136-140 discussion 140-3
44. Guibaud L. Bret P.M. Reinhold C. Atri M. Barkun A.N.G. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: Value of MR cholangiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 1994 847-850
45. Romagnuolo J. Barkun A.J. Joseph L. Reinhold C. Barkun J.S. Which patients with suspected biliary obstruction are most likely to benefit from MRCP? Gastroenterology 118 Suppl. 2 2000 A-192
46. Taylor A.C. Little A.F. Hennessy O.F. Banting S.W. Smith P.J. Desmond P.V. Prospective, blinded study of MRCP compared to MRCP and assessment of their respective clinical role Gastroenterology 118 Suppl. 2 2000 A-207