|
Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 174-180
|
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness;Colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética (CPRM) frente a colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE): utilidad diagnóstica.
a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE DUCT;
BILE DUCT CARCINOMA;
BILE DUCT TUMOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
GALLSTONE;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PANCREAS DISEASE;
PANCREAS DUCT;
RADIOGRAPHY;
VATER PAPILLA;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AMPULLA OF VATER;
BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
BILE DUCTS;
BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC;
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
FEMALE;
GALLSTONES;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PANCREATIC DISEASES;
PANCREATIC DUCTS;
|
EID: 0032038095
PISSN: 02105705
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (0)
|