Multivariate approach for quantification of morphologic and functional damage in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1099-1110

  Martus, Peter ^a,b   Jünemann, Anselm ^b   Wisse, Martin ^b   Budde, Wido M ^b   Horn, Folkert ^b   Korth, Matthias ^b   Jonas, Jost B ^b  

^a Dept Med Info Biometr/E ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; OPTIC DISK ANOMALY; OPTIC NERVE ATROPHY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FLICKER FUSION; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA;

EID: 0034079609     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fleiss JL. Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(suppl 1):S7-S14.
3. Chinn S. The assessment of methods of measurement. Stat Med. 1990;9:351-362.
4. Lawley DN, Maxwell AE. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. Kent, UK; Butterworth; 1971.
5. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GOH. Glaucomatous parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy: occurrence and correlations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:214-222.
6. Horn FK, Jonas JB, Korth M, Jünemann A, Gründler A. The full field flicker test in early diagnosis of chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:313-319.
7. Korth M, Nguyen NX, Jünemann A, Martus P, Jonas JB. VEP test of the blue-sensitive pathway in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2599-2610.
8. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J, Asman P. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:204-208.
9. Littmann H. Zur Bestimmung der wahren Grösse eines Objekts auf dem Hintergrund des lebenden Auges. (Determination of the real size of an object on the fundus of the living eye). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1982;180:286-289.
10. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Naumann GOH. Variability of the real dimensions of normal optic discs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:332-336.
11. Bebié H, Flammer J, Bebié T. The cumulative defect curve: separation of local and diffuse components of visual field damage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227:9-12.
12. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1994.
13. Norusis MJ. SPSS for Windows: Base System User's Guide. Release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS; 1993.
14. Arbuckle JL. Amos User's Guide. Version 3.6. Chicago: SmallWaters; 1997.
15. Fink H. Interpretation of factor analyses in experimental ophthalmology. Doc Ophthalmol. 1969;27:154-165.
16. Elam JT, Graney MJ, Applegate WB, et al. Functional outcome one year following cataract surgery in elderly persons. J Gerontol. 1988;43:M122-M126.
17. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the "Activities of Daily Vision Scale": a measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30:1111-1126.
18. Oden N. Morphology of the normal visual field in a population-based random sample: principal components analysis. Stat Med. 1992;11:1131-1150.
19. Drolsum L, Davanger M, Haaskjold E. Pattern of characteristics in cataract patients. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72:279-283.
20. Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Revelins BI, Derlacki DJ, Anderson RJ. Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:53-59.
21. Kenny DA. Correlation and Causality. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1979.
22. Tucker LR. Relations of factor score estimates to their use. Psychometrika. 1971;36:427-436.
23. Jünemann A, Horn F, Martus P, Jonas JB, Korth M. Sinnesphysiologie und Papillen-biomorphometrie: Korrelationsanalysen bei Normalpersonen. (Sensory physiology and biomorphology of the optic papilla: analysis of correlation in normal persons). Klin Monatsbl Augenbeilkd. 1996;209:286-291.
24. Asman P, Heijl A. Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72:303-308.
25. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Algra D, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PTVM. Primary open angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure, and systemic blood pressure in the general elderly population. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:54-60.
26. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Schachat AP, Hyman L, the Barbados Eye Study Group. The Barbados Eye Study: prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:821-829.
27. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Wu S-Y, Schachat AP, Hyman L, Schachat AP, the Barbados Eye Study Group. Risk factors for open angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 918-924.
28. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, III: quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic optic neuropathy, papilledema and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
29. Jonas JB, Königsreuther KA. Optic disk appearance in ocular hypertensive eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:732-740.