Efficient minimization of angle-dependent potentials for polypeptides in internal coordinates

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 262-272

  Wedemeyer, William J ^a,b   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Angular potentials; Cross correlated relaxations; Dihedral angle energy gradient; NMR structure determination; Recursive methods; Residual dipolar coupling; Vector angle restraint; Vector displacement restraint; Vector tensor restraint

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIPOLE; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PEPTOSTREPTOCOCCUS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TENSION;

HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS;

EID: 0141592369     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10525     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p 420-430.
2. Li Z, Scheraga HA. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:6611-6615.
3. Reif B, Hennig M, Griesinger C. Direct measurement of angles between bond vectors in high-resolution NMR. Science 1997;276: 1230-1233.
4. Schwalbe H, Carlomagno T, Hennig M, Junker J, Reif B, Richter C, Griesinger C. Cross-correlated relaxation for measurement of angles between tensorial interactions. Methods Enzymol 2001;338: 35-81.
5. Tolman JR, Flanagan JM, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH. Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:9279-9283.
6. Prestegard JH, Al-Hashimi HM, Tolman JR. NMR structures of biomolecules using field oriented media and residual dipolar couplings. Quart Rev Biophys 2000;33:371-424.
7. Bax A, Kontaxis G, Tjandra N. Dipolar couplings in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol 2001;339:127-174.
8. Abe H, Braun W, Noguti T, Go N. Rapid calculation of 1st and 2nd derivatives of conformational energy with respect to dihedral angles for proteins-general recurrent equations. Comput Chem 1984;8:239-247.
9. Braun W, Gō N. Calculation of protein conformations by proton proton distance constraints-a new efficient algorithm. J Mol Biol 1985;186:611-626.
10. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. Mechanics, 3rd ed. New York: Pergamon Press; 1976. p 18-19.
11. Meiler J, Blomberg N, Nilges M, Griesinger C. A new approach for applying residual dipolar couplings as restraints in structure elucidation. J Biomol NMR 2000;16:245-252.
12. Skrynnikov NR, Kay LE. Assessment of molecular structure using frame-independent orientational restraints derived from residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 2000;18:239-252.
13. Coulson CA. The hydrogen bond. In: Hadži D, editor. Hydrogen bonding. New York: Pergamon Press; 1959. p 339-360.
14. de Santis P, Giglio E, Liquori AM, Ripamonti A. van der Waals interaction and the stability ofhelical polypeptide chains. Nature 1965;206:456-458.
15. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
16. 13C couplings in the structure determination of magnetically oriented macromolecules in solution. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:732-738.
17. Flory PJ, Yoon DY. Moments and distribution functions for polymer chains of finite length. I. Theory. J Chem Phys 1974;61: 5358-5365.
18. Wedemeyer WJ, Rohl CA, Scheraga HA. Exact solutions for chemical bond orientations from residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 2002;22:137-151.
19. NC' scalar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:1601-1602.
20. Cornilescu G, Hu JS, Bax A. Identification of the hydrogen bonding network in a protein by scalar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:2949-2950.
21. Grzesiek S, Cordier F, Dingley AT. Scalar couplings across hydrogen bonds. Methods Enzymol 2001;338:111-133.
22. Ptitsyn OB. Stagewise mechanism of self-organization of protein molecules. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 1973;210:1213-1215.
23. Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975;253:694-698.
24. Hadži D, editor. Theoretical treatments of hydrogen bonding. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1997.
25. Scheiner S. Hydrogen bonding: a theoretical perspective. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
26. Moulton WG, Kromhout RA. Nuclear magnetic resonance: structure of the amino group. II. J Chem Phys 1956;25:34-37.
27. Schroeder R, Lippincott ER. Potential function model of hydrogen bonds. II. J Phys Chem 1957;61:921-928.
28. Scott RA, Scheraga HA. Conformational analysis of macromolecules. III. Helical structures of polyglycine and poly-L-alanine. J Chem Phys 1966;45:2091-2101.
29. Ooi T, Scott RA, Vanderkooi G, Scheraga HA. Conformational analysis of macromolecules. IV. Helical structures of poly-L-alanine, poly-L-valine, poly-β-methyl-L-aspartate, poly-γ-methyl-L-glutamate, and poly-L-tyrosine. J Chem Phys 1967;46:4410-4426.
30. Hagler AT, Huler E, Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J Am Chem Soc 1974;96:5319-5327.
31. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4: 187-217.
32. Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA III. DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 1990;94:8897-8909.
33. Gordon DB, Marshall SA, Mayo SL. Energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:509-513.
34. Fabiola F, Bertram R, Korostelev A, Chapman MS. An improved hydrogen bond potential: impact on medium resolution protein structures. Protein Sci 2002;11:1415-1423.
35. Lipsitz RS, Sharma Y, Brooks BR, Tjandra N. Hydrogen bonding in high-resolution protein structures: a new method to assess NMR protein geometry. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:10621-10626.
36. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2003;326:1239-1259.
37. Bronshtein IN, Semendyayev KA. Handbook of mathematics. Frankfurt: Verlag Harri Deutsch; 1985. p 186-190.
38. Losonczi JA, Andrec M, Fischer MWF, Prestegard JH. Order matrix analysis of residual dipolar couplings using singular value decomposition. J Magn Reson 1999;138:334-342.
39. Spronk CAEM, Linge JP, Hilbers CW, Vuister GW. Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 2002;22:281-289.
40. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graphics 1996;14:51-55.
41. Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 2003;160:65-73.
42. McGuire RF, Momany FA, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides. V. An empirical hydrogen bond potential function based on molecular orbital calculations. J Phys Chem 1972;76:375-393.