Differences between accounts provided by witnesses and alleged victims of child sexual abuse

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1019-1031

  Lamb, Michael E ^a   Sternberg, Kathleen J ^a   Orbach, Yael ^a   Hershkowitz, Irit ^b   Horowitz, Dvora ^c  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c DIVISION FOR INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (Israel)

Author keywords

Alleged victims' accounts; Child sexual abuse; Witness accounts

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; VICTIM; WITNESS;

EID: 0141535288     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00167-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (2002). Guidelines for psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children (rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: APSAC.
2. Bates J.L., Ricciardelli L.A., Clarke V.A. The effects of participation and presentation media on the eyewitness memory of children. Australian Journal of Psychology. 51:1999;71-76.
3. Bruck M., Ceci S.J., Francouer E., Renick A. Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 1:1995;95-109.
4. Bull R. Obtaining evidence expertly: The reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence. 1:1992;5-12.
5. Bull, R. (1996). Good practice for video-recorded interviews with child witnesses for use in criminal proceedings. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMarran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 100-117). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
6. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Cederborg A., Orbach Y., Sternberg K.J., Lamb M.E. Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24:2000;1355-1361.
8. Christianson A.-A. Emotional stress and eye-witness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin. 112:1992;284-309.
9. Craig R.A., Sheibe R., Kircher J., Raskin D.C., Dodd D. Interviewer questions and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science. 3:1999;77-85.
10. Dale P.S., Loftus E.F., Rathbun L. The influence of the form of the question of the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 74:1978;269-277.
11. Davies G.M., Westcott H.L., Horan N. The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law. 6:2000;81-97.
12. Deffenbacher, K. A. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 235-251). New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279-297). Stockholm: Norstedt.
14. Dent H.R. An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally-handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 25:1986;13-17.
15. Dent H.R., Stephenson G.M. An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 18:1979;41-51.
16. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
17. Gobbo C., Mega C., Pipe M.E. Does the nature of the experience influence suggestibility? A study of children's event memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 81:2002;502-530.
18. Goodman G.S., Aman C. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event. Child Development. 61:1990;1859-1871.
19. Goodman G.S., Bottoms B.L., Schwartz-Kenney B.M., Rudy L. Children's testimony about a stressful event: Improving children's reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1:1991;69-99.
20. Goodman G.S., Hirschman J.E., Hepps D., Rudy L. Children's memory for stressful events. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 37:1991;109-158.
21. Hutcheson G.D., Baxter J.S., Telfer K., Warden D. Child witness statement quality: Question type and errors of omission. Law and Human Behavior. 19:1995;631-648.
22. Jones, D. P. H. (1992). Interviewing the sexually abused child: Investigation of suspected abuse (4th ed.). London: Gaskell.
23. Kuehnle, K. (1996). Assessing allegations of child sexual abuse. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.
24. Lamb M.E., Fauchier A. The effects of question type on self-contradiction by children in the course of forensic interviews. Applied Cognitive Development. 15:2001;483-491.
25. Lamb M.E., Hershkowitz I., Sternberg K.J., Boat B., Everson M.D. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect. 20:1996;1251-1259.
26. Lamb M.E., Hershkowitz I., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W., Hovav M., Manor T. Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children's responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 19:1996;627-637.
27. Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W. Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect. 22:1998;813-823.
28. Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W. Effects of age and delay on the amount of information provided by alleged sex abuse victims in investigative interviews. Child Development. 21:2000;1586-1596.
29. Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W., Hershkowitz I., Orbach Y., Hovav M. Criterion-based content analysis: A field validation study. Child Abuse & Neglect. 21:1997;255-264.
30. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (in press). Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
31. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., & Esplin, P. W. (1999). Forensic interviews of children. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 253-277). New York, NY: Wiley.
32. Lindberg M.A., Jones S., Collard L.M., Thomas S.W. Similarities and differences in eyewitness testimonies of children who directly versus vicariously experience stress. Journal of Genetics Psychology. 102:2001;314-333.
33. Memorandum of Good Practice. (1992). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
34. Murachver T., Pipe M.E., Gordon R., Owens J.L., Fivush R. Do, show, and tell: Children's event memories acquired through direct experience, observation, and stories. Child Development. 67:1996;3029-3044.
35. Oates K., Shrimpton S. Children's memories for stressful and non-stressful events. Medical Science and the Law. 31:1991;4-10.
36. Orbach Y., Hershkowitz I., Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W., Horowitz D. Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24:2000;733-752.
37. Orbach Y., Lamb M.E. Enhancing children's narratives in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24:2000;1631-1648.
38. Ornstein P.A., Gordon B.N., Larus D.M. Children's memory for a personally experienced event: Implications for testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 6:1992;49-60.
39. Peters, D. P. (1991). The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 60-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40. Peterson C., Bell M. Children's memory for traumatic injury. Child Development. 67:1996;3045-3070.
41. Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Poole D.A., Lindsay D.S. Assessing the accuracy of children's reports: Lessons from the investigation of child sexual abuse. Applied & Preventive Psychology. 7:1998;1-26.
43. Raskin D.C., Esplin P.W. Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analyses of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment. 13:1991;265-291.
44. Roberts K.P., Blades M. The effects of interacting in repeated events on children's eyewitness memory and source monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 12:1998;489-503.
45. Rudy L., Goodman G.S. Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony. Developmental Psychology. 27:1991;527-538.
46. Samra J., Yuille J.C. Anatomically-neutral dolls: Their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year old eyewitnesses. Child Abuse & Neglect. 20:1996;1261-1272.
47. Saywitz K.J., Goodman G.S., Nicholas E., Moan S.F. Children's memories of physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 59:1991;682-691.
48. Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 467-521). New York: Wiley.
49. Sternberg K.J., Lamb M.E., Davies G.M., Westcott H.L. The Memorandum of Good Practice: Theory versus application. Child Abuse & Neglect. 25:2001;669-681.
50. Sternberg K.J., Lamb M.E., Hershkowitz I., Esplin P.W., Redlich A., Sunshine N. The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 17:1996;439-451.
51. Sternberg K.J., Lamb M.E., Orbach Y., Esplin P.W., Mitchell S. Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85:2001;997-1005.
52. Steward M.S., Steward D.S., Farquhar L., Myers J.E.B., Reinhart M., Welker J. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 61(4-5):1996;1-186.
53. Tobey A.E., Goodman G.S. Children's eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context. Child Abuse & Neglect. 16:1992;779-796.
54. Walker, N., & Hunt, J. S. (1998). Interviewing child victim-witnesses: How you ask is what you get. In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrman, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, D. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 55-87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Walker, N. E., Lunning, S., & Eilts, J. L. (1996, June). Do children respond accurately to forced choice questions? Yes or no. Paper presented at Recollections of Trauma: Scientific Research and Clinical Practice, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Port de Bourgenay, France.
56. Wells, G. L., Turtle, J. W., & Luus, C. A. E. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use their own words? In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 23-46). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
57. Yuille J.C., Cutshall J.L. A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology. 71:1986;291-301.