Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: A hard- versus soft-copy comparative study;Interprétation des clichés thoraciques en réanimation chirurgicale: Étude comparative film/écran

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 993-999

  Bricault, I ^a,b   Bosson, J L ^a   Declety, P ^a   Lavagne, P ^a   Ferretti, G ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

Author keywords

Chest; Digital radiographs; Hard copy; Intensive care unit; Soft copy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; HARD COPY; HUMAN; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERNAL MEDICINE; KAPPA INDEX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; RADIOLOGY; RELIABILITY; RESIDENT; ROC CURVE; SOFT COPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0141483626     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Goodman LR, Foley WD, Wilson CR, Rimm AA, Lawson TL. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System. Radiology 1986;158:27-33.
2. Foley WD, Wilson CR, Keyes GS et al. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs. Radiology 1981;141:25-31.
3. Lams PM, Cocklin ML. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. Radiology 1986;158:11-9.
4. Cox GG, Cook LT, McMillan JH, Rosenthal SJ, Dwyer SJ 3rd. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Radiology 1990;176:771-6.
5. Eng J, Mysko WK, Weller GE et al. Interpretation of Emergency Department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1233-8.
6. Parasyn A, Hanson RM, Peat JK, De Silva M. A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians. J Digit Imaging 1998;11:45-9.
7. Scott WW Jr, Bluemke DA, Mysko WK et al. Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings. Radiology 1995;195:223-9.
8. Kundel HL, Gefter W, Aronchick J et al. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 1997;205:859-63.
9. Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH et al. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance. Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:575-81.
10. Steckel RJ, Batra P, Johnson S et al. Chest teleradiology in a teaching hospital emergency practice. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1409-13.
11. Le Corre A, Genevois A, Benichou J, Petit J, Veber B, Dureuil B. Interprétation des clichés thoraciques standards chez les traumatisés thoraciques: influence de l'expérience du lecteur. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1999;18:503-8.
12. Brill PW, Winchester P, Cahill P et al. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K × 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:333-6.
13. Kundel HL, Polansky M, Dalinka MK et al. Reliability of soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of emergency department radiographs: a prototype study. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:525-8.
14. Brill PW, Winchester P. Hard-versus soft-copy readings of computed radiographs. Radiology 1998;208:270-1.
15. Le Corre A, Genevois A, Hellot MF, Veber B, Dureuil B. L'analyse du cliché thoracique chez le traumatisé n'est amélioré e ni par une grille de lecture ni par l'expérience du lecteur. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2001;20:23-7
16. Gale ME, Vincent ME, Robbins AH. Teleradiology for remote diagnosis: a prospective multi-year evaluation. J Digit Imaging 1997;10:47-50.
17. Elam EA, Rehm K, Hillman BJ, Maloney K, Fajardo LL, McNeill K. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:509-14.
18. Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 1990;174:775-80.
19. DeCorato DR, Kagetsu NJ, Ablow RC. Off-hours interpretation of radiologic images of patients admitted to the emergency department: efficacy of teleradiology. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1293-6.
20. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Mixture distribution and receiver operating characteristic analysis of bedside chest imaging with screen-film and computed radiography. Acad Radiol 1997;4:1-7.
21. Jennings P, Padley SP, Hansell DM. Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography. Br J Radiol 1992;65:852-6.
22. Frija J, de Gery S, Lallouet F, Guermazi A, Zagdanski AM, de Kerviler E. Radiographie thoracique numérisée: appareillages, traitements d'images, limites. J Radiol 2001;82:1045-53.