Hard- versus soft-copy readings of computed radiographs

Radiology

Volumn 208, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 270-

  Brill, Paula W ^a   Winchester, Patricia ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LETTER; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X RAY ANALYSIS;

CHILD; DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE; PNEUMOTHORAX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0031926548     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.270-b     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Kundel HL, Gefter W, Aronchick J, et al. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 1997; 205:859-863.
2. Brill PW, Winchester P, Cahill P, et al. Computed radiography in neonatal and pédiatrie intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5K x 2K soft-copy vs digital hard copy film. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26:333-336.
3. Brill PW, Winchester P. Computed radiography in neonatal and pédiatrie intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5K x 2K vs 1.6K x 1.2K monitor images (abstr). Radiology. 1997; 205(P):402.