Comparison of the National Research Council-2001 model with the Dutch system (DVE/OEB) in the prediction of nutrient supply to dairy cows from forages

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 2178-2192

  Yu, P ^a   Christensen, D A ^a   McKinnon, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dairy cows; DVE OEB system; Forages; NRC 2001 model; Protein evaluation

Indexed keywords

BOS TAURUS; CASTOR FIBER; MEDICAGO; MEDICAGO SATIVA; PHLEUM PRATENSE;

ALFALFA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; INTESTINE ABSORPTION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PHLEUM PRATENSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN INTAKE; RUMINANT STOMACH;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CATTLE; DIET; DIETARY PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; INTESTINAL ABSORPTION; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NETHERLANDS; PHLEUM; RUMEN;

EID: 0141462818     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73808-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AOAC. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA.
2. ARC. 1984. Page 45 in The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock. Suppl. No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, England.
3. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Vol. 1, 2nd ed. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.
4. CVB. Centraal Veevoeder Bureau. 1996. Voorlopig protocol voor in sacco pensincubatie voor het meten van eiwitbestendigheid, 14 November.
5. De Boever, J. L., N. Iantcheva, B. G. Cottyn, S. De Campeneere, L. O. Fiems, and CH. V. Boucque. 1998. Microbial protein synthesis in growing-finishing bulls estimated from the urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 75:93-109.
6. Egan, A. R., K. Koda, and K. Barady. 1985. Regulation of N metabolism and recycling. In: Control of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. Pages 146-153 in Proc. 6th International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. Butterworths, London.
7. Hoover, W. H., and S. R. Stokes. 1991. Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3630-3644.
8. INRA. 1978. Alimentation des ruminants. Page 597 in Inst. National de la Rech. Agron. Versailles.
9. Licitra, G., T. M. Hernandezb, and P. J. Van Soest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:347-358.
10. Maden, J. 1985. The basis for the proposed Nordic protein evaluation system for ruminants. The AAT-PBV system. Acta. Agri. Scand. (Suppl.) 25:9-20.
11. Markert, J. D., and D. A. Christensen. 2002. A comparison of the nutritional characteristics of two cultivars of alfalfa and timothy at three stages of maturity. Thesis, Dept. Animal and Poultry Science, Univ. Saskatchewan, Canada.
12. Marten, G. C., and R. F. Barnes. 1980. Prediction of energy digestibility of forage with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems. Pages 61-71 in Proc. Int. Workshop on Standardization, Analytical Methodology for Feeds. W. J. Pigden, G. C. Balch, and M. Graham, ed. Ottawa, Canada.
13. McKinnon, J. J., J. A. Olubobokun, A. Mustafa, R. D. H. Cohen, and D. A. Christensen. 1995. Influence of dry heat treatment of canola meal on site and extent of nutrient disappearance in ruminant. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 56:243-252.
14. Moscardini, S., T. C. Wright, P. H. Luimes, B. W. McBride, and P. Susmel. 1998. Effects of rumen-undegradable protein and feed intake on purine derivative and urea nitrogen: Comparision with predictions from the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2421-2429.
15. Muia, J. M. K., S. Tamminga, P. N. Mbugua, and J. N. Kariuki. 2001. Rumen degradation and estimation of microbial protein yield and intestinal digestion of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and various concentrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 93:177-192.
16. NKJ-NJF. 1985. Introduction of the Nordic protein evaluation system for ruminants into practice and future research requirements. Proposals by the NKJ-NJF protein group. Acta Agric. Scand. 25 (Suppl.):216-220.
17. NRC. 1985. Ruminant nitrogen usage. Page 138 in National Academy Press. Washington DC.
18. NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirement of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Research Council, Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.
19. Ørskov, E. R., and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to the rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci., (Cambridge) 92:499-503.
20. Robinson, P. H., J. G. Fadel, and S. Tamminga. 1986. Evaluation of mathematical models to describe neutral detergent residue in terms of its susceptibility to degradation in the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 15:249-271.
21. SAS. 1991. SAS/STAT User's Guide (Release 6). SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
22. Sniffen, C. J., J. D. O'Connor, P. J. Van Soest, D. G. Fox, and J. B. Russell. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562-3577.
23. Tamminga, S., A. M. van Vuuren, C. J. van der Koelen, R. S. Ketelaar, and P. L. van der Togt. 1990. Ruminal behavior of structural carbohydrates, nonstructural carbohydrates, and crude protein from concentrate ingredients in dairy cows. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:513-526.
24. Tamminga, S., W. M. Van Straalen, A. P. J. Subnel, R. G. M. Meijer, A. Steg, C. J. G. Wever, and M. C. Block. 1994. The Dutch Protein Evaluation System: The DVE/OEB-system. Livest. Prod. Sci. 40:139-155.
25. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
26. Varhegyi, J., J. Schmidt, E. Cenkvari, J. Varhegyi. 1998. Comparison of the new Hungarian protein evaluation system for ruminants with foreign systems. Allattenyesztes es Takarmanyozas. 47:239-246.
27. Vérité, R., and Y. Geay. 1987. Evaluation and implementation of the PDI system in France. Pages 249-261 in Feed valuation and protein requirement systems for ruminants. R. Jarrige, and G. Aldeirman, ed. ECSC-EEC-EAEC. Brussels.
28. Weiss, W. P., H. R. Conrad, and N. R. S. Pierre. 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 39:95-110.
29. Yu, P., A. R. Egan, and B. J. Leury. 1999. Protein evaluation of dry roasted whole faba bean and lupin seeds by the new Dutch protein evaluation system: The DVE/OEB system. Asian-Austr. J. Anim Sci. 12:871-880.
30. Yu, P., J. O. Goelema, S. Tamminga. 2000. Determination of optimal conditions of pressure toasting on horse beans for dairy feed industry, by the DVE/OEB model. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86:165-176.
31. Yu, P., L. Boon-ek, B. J. Leury, and A. R. Egan. 2001. Effect of dietary protein variation in terms of net truly digested intestinal protein (DVE) and rumen degraded protein balance (OEB) on the concentrations and excretion of urinary creatinine, purine derivatives, and microbial N supply in sheep: Comparison with the prediction from the DVE/OEB model. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 93:71-91
32. Yu, P., D. A. Christensen, J. J. McKinnon, and J. Markert. 2002a. Effect of variety and maturity stage on chemical composition, carbohydrate, and protein subfractions, in vitro rumen degradability and energy values of timothy and alfalfa. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: (In press).
33. Yu, P., J. O. Goelema, B. J. Leury, S. Tamminga, and A. R. Egan. 2002b. An analysis of the nutritive value of heat processed legume seeds for animal production using the DVE/OEB model: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 99:141-176.