International communication, ethnography, and the challenge of globalization

Communication Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 304-323

  Murphy, Patrick D ^a   Kraidy, Marwan M ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GLOBALIZATION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 0141461373     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00294.x     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences. London: Sage.
2. Abu-Lughod, L. (1999). The interpretation of culture(s) after television. In S. Ortner (Ed.), The fate of "culture": Geertz and beyond (pp. 110-135). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Akindes, F. (1999). Methodology as lived experience: Rhizomatic ethnography in Hawai'i. Diegesis, 5, 16-26.
4. Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen.
5. Ang, I. (1996). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. London: Routledge.
6. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Asad, T. (1994). Ethnographic representation, statistics and modern power. Social Research, 61, 55-88.
8. Barrios, L. (1988). Television, telenovelas and family life in Venezuela. In L. Lull (Ed.), World families watch television (pp. 49-79). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
10. Boyd-Barrett, O. (1998). Media imperialism reformulated. In D. K. Thussu (Ed.), Electronic empires: Global media and local resistance (pp. 157-176). London: Arnold.
11. Braman, S. (1996). Interpenetrated globalization. In S. Braman & A. Sreberny-Mohammadi (Eds.), Globalization, communication, and transnational civil society (pp. 21-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12. Clifford, J. (1983). On ethnographic authority, Representations, 1, 118-146.
13. Clifford, J. (1992). Traveling cultures. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 96-116). New York: Routledge.
14. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1988). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs 58, 141-156.
16. Drotner, K. (1994). Ethnographic enigmas: "The everyday" in recent media studies. Cultural Studies, 8, 208-225.
17. Drotner, K. (1996). Less is more: Media ethnography and its limits. In P. I. Crawford & S. B. Hafsteinsson (Eds.), The construction of the viewer (pp. 28-46). Hojbjerg, Denmark: Intervention Press.
18. Fine, M. (1998). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds. , The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 130-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Fox, R. (Ed.). (1991). Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present. Santa Fe, NM: School for American Research Press.
20. García Canclini, N. (1990). Culturas hibridas. Mexico City, Mexico: Grijalbo.
21. García Canclini, N. (1992). Cultural reconversion. In G. Yúdice, J. Franco, & J. Flores (Eds.), On edge: The crisis of contemporary Latin American culture (pp. 29-43). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22. García Canclini, N. (1993). The hybrid: A conversation with Margarita Zires, Raymundo Mier, and Mabel Piccini. boundary 2, 20(3),76-92.
23. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
24. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
25. Gillespie, M. (1995). Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: Routledge.
26. Gonzalez, J. (1992). The confraternity of (un)finishable emotions: Constructing Mexican telenovelas. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture 11, 59-92.
27. Gonzalez, J. (1997). The willingness to weave: Cultural analysis, cultural fronts and networks of the future. Media Development, 44, 59-92.
28. Grossberg, L. (1989). On the road with three ethnographers. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 13, 23-26.
29. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language, (pp. 128-138). London: Hutchinson.
30. Hay, J. (1996). Afterword. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.) The audience and its landscape, (pp. 359-378). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31. hooks, b. (1990). Culture to culture: Ethnography and cultural studies as critical intervention. In Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics (pp. 123-143). Boston: South End Press.
32. Hüwelmeier, G. (2000). When people are broadcast their ethnographics: Text, mass media and voices from the field. Social Anthropology, 8, 45-49.
33. Juluri, V. (1998) Globalizing audience studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 15, 85-90.
34. Kraidy, M. M. (1999). The global, the local, and the hybrid: A native ethnography of glocalization. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16, 456-476.
35. Kraidy, M. M. (2002a). Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory, 12, 316-339.
36. Kraidy, M. M. (2002b). Ferment in global media studies. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46, 630-640.
37. Kraidy, M. M. (in press). Globalization avant la lettre? Cultural hybridity and media power in Lebanon. In P. D. Murphy & M. M. Kraidy (Eds.), Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 276-295). London: Routledge.
38. La Pastina, A. (2001). Product placement in Brazilian prime-time television: The case of a telenovela reception. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 541-557.
39. Leal, O. F. (1990). Popular taste and erudite repertoire: The place and space of television in Brazil. Cultural Studies, 4, 19-29.
40. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. New York: Free Press.
41. Lindlof, T. (1987). Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Livingstone, S. (1998). Audience research at the crossroads: The "implied audience" in media and cultural theory. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1, 193-217.
43. Lotz, A. (2000). Assessing qualitative television audience research: Incorporating feminist and anthropological theoretical innovation. Communication Theory, 10, 447-467.
44. Lull, J. (Ed.). (1990). Inside family viewing: Ethnographic research on television's audiences. New York: Routledge.
45. Mankekar, P. (1999). Screening culture, viewing politics: An ethnography of television, womanhood and nation in postcolonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. Marcus, G. E. (1986). Contemporary problems of ethnography in the world system. In G. E. Marcus & M. J. Fisher, Anthropology as cultural critique (pp. 165-193). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Marcus, G. E. (1998a). What comes (just) after "post?": The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 383-406). Sage.
48. Marcus, G. E. (1998b). Ethnography through thick & thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Marcus, G. E., & Fisher, M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Martín-Barbero, J. (1993). Latin American cultures in communication media. (E. Fox, Trans.) Journal of Communication, 43(2), 18-30.
51. Martín-Barbero, J. (2000). The cultural mediations of television consumption. In I. Hagen & J. Wasko (Eds.), Consuming audiences? Production and reception in media research (pp. 145-161). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
52. Martín-Barbero, J. (2002). Identities: Traditions and new communities. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 621-641.
53. Mattelart, A. (1994). Mapping world communication: War, progress, culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54. Mattelart, A. (1998). Généalogie de nouveaux scénarios de la communication. In J. Berdot, F. Calvez, & I. Ramonet (Eds.), L'après-télévision: Multimédia, virtuel, Internet. Actes du Colloque '25 images/seconde" (page numbers unavailable). Valence, France: CRAC.
55. Moore, D. C. (1994). "Anthropology is dead, long live anthro(a)pology": Poststructuralism, literary studies, and anthropology's nervous present. Journal of Anthropological Research, 50, 345-364.
56. Moores, S. (1993). Interpreting audiences: The ethnography of media consumption. London: Sage.
57. Morley, D. (1980). The nationwide audience. London: British Film Institute.
58. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences & cultural studies. London: Routledge.
59. Morley, D. (1996). The audience, the ethnographer, the postmodernist and their problems. In P. I. Crawford & S. B. Hafsteinsson (Eds.), The construction of the viewer (pp. 11-27). Hojbjerg, Denmark: Intervention Press.
60. Mowlana, H. (1994). Shapes of the future: International communication in the twenty-first century. Journal of International Communication, 1, 14-32.
61. Murphy, P. D. (1999a). Media cultural studies' uncomfortable embrace of ethnography. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23, 205-221.
62. Murphy, P. D. (1999b). Doing audience ethnography: A narrative account of establishing ethnographic identity and locating interpretive communities in fieldwork. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 479-504.
63. Murphy, P. D. (2002). The anthropologist's son (living and learning the field). Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 246-260.
64. Murphy, P. D. (2003). Without ideology? Rethinking hegemony in the age of transnational media. In L. Artz & Y. Kamalipour (Eds. , The globalization of corporate media hegemony. New York: SUNY Press.
65. Murphy, P. D. (in press). Chasing echoes: Cultural reconversion, self-representation, and mediascapes in Mexico. In P. D. Murphy & M. M. Kraidy (Eds.), Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 257-275). London: Routledge.
66. Murphy, P. D., & Kraidy, M. M. (in press). (Eds.). Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge.
67. Nightingale, V. (1993). What's "ethnographic" about ethnographic audience research? In J. Frow & M. Morris (Eds.), Australian cultural studies (pp. 149-161). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
68. Nightingale, V. (1996). Studying audiences: The shock of the real. London: Routledge.
69. Orozco, G. (1995). The dialectic of TV reception. Mexican Journal of Communication, 2, 93-106.
70. Parameswaran, R. (2001). Feminist media ethnography in India: Exploring power, gender, and culture in the field. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 69-103.
71. Quantz, R. A., & O'Connor, T. W. (1988). Writing critical ethnography: Dialogue, multivoicedness, and carnival texts. Educational Theory, 38, 95-109.
72. Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
73. Rodriguez, C., & Murphy, P.D. (1997). The study of communication and culture in Latin America: Form laggards and the oppressed to resistance and hybrid cultures. Journal of International Communication, 4, 24-45.
74. Rogers, E. (1969). Modernization among peasants. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
75. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
76. Sandstrom, A. (1995). The wave: Fieldwork and friendship in northern Veracruz, Mexico. B. Grindal & F. Salamone (Eds.), Bridges to humanity: Narratives on anthropology and friendship (pp. 172-192). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
77. Schiller, H. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. White Plains, NY: International Arts & Sciences Press.
78. Schiller, H. (1991). Not yet the post-imperialist era. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 13-28.
79. Schiller, H. (1996). Information inequality. London: Routledge.
80. Schramm, W. L. (1964). Mass media and national development: The role of information in the developing countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
81. Seiter, E. (2000). Television and new media audiences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
82. Shokeid, M. (1997). Negotiating multiple viewpoints: The cook, the native, the publisher and the ethnographic text, Current Anthropology, 38, 631-646.
83. Sreberny-Mohammadi, A. (1991). The local and the global in international communications. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 118-138). London: Arnold.
84. Thussu, D. K. (1998). Localising the global. In D. K. Thussu (Ed.), Electronic empires: Global media and local resistance (pp. 273-294). London: Arnold.
85. Tomaselli, K. G. (2001). Blue is hot, red is cold: Doing reverse cultural studies in Africa. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 1, 283-318.
86. Tufte, T. (2000). Living with the rubbish queen: Telenovelas, culture and modernity in Brazil. London: University of Luton Press.
87. Trinh, M.-H. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Weiss, W. A. (1993). Gringo ... Gringa. Anthropological Quarterly, 66, 187-196.
89. Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.