Host specificity of epiphytic bryophyte communities of a laurel forest on Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

Bryologist

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 383-394

  González Mancebo, Juana Maria ^a   Losada Lima, Ana ^a   McAlister, Suzanne ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; ERICA; ERICA SCOPARIA; ILEX; ILEX CANARIENSIS; ILEX PERADO; LAURUS; LAURUS AZORICA; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; MORELLA FAYA; MYRICA; MYRICA FAYA; MYRICACEAE; PTERIDOPHYTA; SCOPARIA;

EID: 0043287899     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/04     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ABOAL, J. R. 1998. Los flujos netos hidrológicos y químicos asociados de un bosque de laurisilva en Tenerife. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de La Laguna.
2. _, D. MORALES, M. HERNÁNDEZ & M. S. JIMÉNEZ. 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Journal of Hydrology 221: 161-175.
3. AUDE, E. & R. S. POULSEN. 2000. Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forests. Applied Vegetation Science 3: 81-88.
4. BAÑARES, A. & E. BARQUIN. 1982. Arboles y arbustos de la Laurisilva Gomera (Parque National Garajonay). Goya Ediciones, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canarias, España.
5. BARKMAN, J. J. 1958. Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen.
6. BATES, J. W. 1982. Quantitative approaches in bryophyte ecology, pp. 1-44. In A. J. E. Smith (ed.), Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, NY.
7. _. 1992. Influence of chemical and physical factors on Quercus and Fraxinus epiphytes at Loch Sunart, western Scotland: a multivariate analysis. Journal of Ecology 80: 163-179.
8. _. 2000. Mineral nutrition, substratum ecology, and pollution, pp. 248-311. In A. J. Shaw & B. Goffinet (eds.), Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press.
9. BERGSTROM, D. M. & C. E. TWEEDIE. 1998. A conceptual model for integrative studies of epiphytes; nitrogen utilisation, a case study. Australian Journal of Botany 46: 273-280.
10. BILLINGS, W. D. & W. B. DREW. 1938. Bark factors affecting the distribution of corticolous bryophyte communities. American Midland Naturalist 20: 302-330.
11. BROWN, D. H. 1982. Mineral nutrition, pp. 383-444. In A. J. E. Smith (ed.), Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. CROCKFORD, R. H. & D. P. RICHARDSON. 1990. Partitioning of rainfall in an eucalypt forest and pine plantation in southeastern Australia. II: stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest and Pinus radiata plantation. Hydrological Processes 4: 145-155.
13. CULBERSON, W. L. 1955. The corticolous communities of lichens and bryophytes in the upland forest of northern Wisconsin. Ecology 25: 215-231.
14. DURING, H. J. 1992. Ecological classifications of bryophytes and lichens, pp. 1-25. In J. W. Bates & A. M. Farmer (eds.), Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment. Oxford Science Publications.
15. EGUCHI, T., W. WILDPRET & M. DEL ARCO. 1999. Synoptic analysis of thermal and moisture conditions in Anaga, Tenerife, the Canary Islands, pp. 23-38. In M. Ohsawa, W. Wildpret & M. del Arco (eds.), Anaga Cloud Forest: A Comparative Study of Evergreen BroadLeaved Forest and Trees of the Canary Islands and Japan. Laboratory of Ecology, Chiba University, Japan.
16. FARMER, A. M., J. W. BATES & J. N. B. BELL. 1991. Seasonal variation in acidic pollutant inputs and their effects on the chemistry of stemflow, bark and epiphyte tissues in three oak woodlands in northwest Britain. New Phytologist 118: 441-451.
17. FERNÁNDEZ-PALACIOS, J. M. & J. P. DE NICOLÁS. 1995. Altitudinal pattern of vegetation variation on Tenerife. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 183-190.
18. GLIME, J. M. & W. S. HONG. 2002. Bole epiphytes on three conifer species from Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada. THE BRYOLOGIST 105: 451-464.
19. GONZÁLEZ-MANCEBO, J. M. & C. D. HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍ A. 1996. Bryophyte life strategies along an altitudinal gradient in El Canal y Los Tiles (La Palma, Canary Islands). Journal of Bryology 19: 243-255.
20. GIMINGHAM, C. H. & R. I. SMITH. 1971. Growth-form and water relations of mosses in the Maritime Antarctic. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 25: 1-21.
21. GRADSTEIN, S. R. 1992. The vanishing tropical rain forest as an environment for bryophytes and lichens, pp. 234-253. In J. W. Bates & A. M. Farmer (eds.), Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment. Oxford Science Publications.
22. HALLGREN, E., M. PALMER & P. MILBERG. 1999. Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broadscale gradients in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology 87: 1-16.
23. HANSEN, A. & P. SUNDING. 1993. Flora of Macaronesia. Checklist of vascular plants 4. Revised edition. Sommerfeltia 17: 1-295.
24. HAWORTH, K. & G. R. MCPHERSON. 1995. Effects of Quercus emoryi trees on precipitation distribution and microclimate in a semi-arid savanna. Journal of Arid Environments 31: 153-170.
25. HEDDERSON, T. A. & R. E. LONGTON. 1996. Life history variation in mosses: water relations, size and phylogeny. Oikos 77: 31-43.
26. HILL, M. O. & H. G. GAUCH, JR. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, and improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
27. HOLLERMAN, P. 1981. Microenvironmental studies in Laurel forest of Canary Islands. Mountain Research and Development 1: 193-207.
28. JONGMAN, R. H. G., C. J. F. TER BRAAK & O. F. R. VAN TONGEREN. 1987. Data Analysis in Community Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen.
29. KAMMER, F. 1974. Klima und Vegetation auf Tenerife, besonders in Hinblick auf den Nebelniederschlag. Scripta Geobotanica 7: 1-78.
30. LEGENDRE, P. & L. LEGENDRE. 1988. Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
31. LLOYD, C. R. & F. A. MARQUES. 1988. Spatial variability of throughfall and stem flow measurements in an Amazonian rain forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 42: 63-73.
32. LOSADA-LIMA, A., G. M. DIRKSE & S. RODRÍGUEZ-NÚÑ EZ. 2001. Division Bryophyta, pp. 88-97. In I. Izquierdo, J. L. Martin, N. Zurita & M. Arechavaleta (eds.), Lista de Especies Silvestres de Canarias (Hongos, Plantas y Animales Terrestres) 2001. Consejería de Política Territorial y Medio Ambiente Gobierno de Canarias.
33. _, J. M. GONZÁLEZ-MANCEBO, E. BELTRÁN TEJERA, B. FEBLES PADILLA, M. C. LEÓN ARENCIBIA & A. BAÑARES BAUDET. 1990a. Contribución al conocimiento de la flora briológica del Monte de Aguas y pasos (Los Silos, Tenerife). II. Briófitos saxícolas y terrícolas. Vieraea 19: 11-18.
34. _ & E. BELTRÁN TEJERA, 1990b. Los briófitos del Parque Nacional de Garajonay, pp. 88-105. In P. L. Pérez de Paz (ed.), Parque Nacional de Garajonay. Patrimonio Mundial. ICONA. Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
35. MÄGDEFRAU, K. 1982. Life forms of bryophytes, pp. 45-48. In A. J. E. Smith (ed.), Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.
36. MARTÍN ESQUIVEL, J. L., H. GARCIA COURT, C. REDONDO ROJAS, I. GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ & I. CARRALERO JAIME. 1995. La Red Canaria de Espacios Naturales Protegidos. Medio Ambiente. Canarias. Gobierno de Canarias.
37. MARZOL, M. V. 1988. La lluvia, un recurso natural para Canarias. Editorial Confederación de cajas de Ahorros.
38. MCALISTER, S. 1997. Cryptogam communities on fallen logs in the Duke Forest, North Carolina. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 115-124.
39. MCCUNE, B. G. & J. A. ANTOS. 1982. Epiphyte communities of the Swan Valley, Montana. THE BRYOLOGIST 85: 1-12.
40. OKSANEN, J. 1988. Impact of habitat, substrate, and microsite classes on the epiphyte vegetation: Interpretation using exploratory and canonical correspondence analysis. Annales Botanici Fenneci 25: 59-71.
41. _. 1996. Is the humped relationship between species richness an artifact due to plot size. Journal of Ecology 84: 293-295.
42. PALMER, M. 1986. Pattern in corticolous bryophyte communities of the North Carolina piedmont: Do mosses see the forest or the trees? THE BRYOLOGIST 89: 59-65.
43. _, D. B. CLARK & D. A. CLARK. 2000. IS the number of tree species in small tropical forest plots nonrandom? Community Ecology 1: 95-101.
44. SANTOS, A. 1990. Bosques de laurisilva en la región macaronésica. Colección Naturaleza y Medio Ambiente No. 49, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
45. SCHMITT, C. K. & N. G. SLACK. 1990. Host specificity of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes: A comparison of the Adirondack Mountains (New York) and the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains (North Carolina). THE BRYOLOGIST 93: 257-274.
46. SIM-SlM, M. & C. SÉRGIO. 1992. Estudio taxonómico e corologico do género Frullania Raddi no arquipélago da Madeira. Portugaliae Acta Biologica (B) 16: 147-172.
47. SMITH, A. J. E. 1982. Epiphytes and epiliths, pp. 191-227. In A. J. E. Smith (ed.), Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.
48. STUDLAR, S. M. 1982. Host specificity of epiphytic bryophytes near Mountain Lake, Virginia. THE BRYOLOGIST 85: 27-50.
49. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis, a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
50. _ & P. ŠMILAUER. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to CANOCO for windows: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
51. VAN LEERDAM, A., R. J. ZAGT & E. J. VENEKLAAS. 1990. The distribution of epiphyte growth-forms in the canopy of a Colombian cloud-forest. Vegetatio 87: 59-71.
52. ZIPPEL, E. 1998. Die epiphytische Moosvegetation der Kanarischen Inseln. Soziologie, Struktur und Ökologie. Ed. J. Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart.