Cryptogam communities on fallen logs in the Duke Forest, North Carolina

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 115-124

  McAlister, Suzanne ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bark; Bryophyte; CCA; Gradient Analysis; Hardwood; Microsite

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTE; COMMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CRYPTOGAM COMMUNITY; LICHEN; LOG;

USA, NORTH CAROLINA, DUKE FOREST;

EID: 0030620070     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3237249     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andersson, L.I. & Hytteborn, H. 1991. Bryophytes and decaying wood - a comparison between a managed and a natural forest. Hol. Ecol. 14: 121-130.
2. Ashton, D.H. 1986. Ecology of bryophytic communities in mature Eucalyptus regnans F. Muehl. forest at Wallaby Creek, Victoria. Aust. J. Bot. 34: 107-129.
3. Bardat, J. 1993. Analyse phyto-écologique de quelques groupements bryophytiques humicoles et saprolignicoles forestiers de Haute-Normandie. Cryptogam. Bryol. Lichenol. 14: 109-178.
4. Barkman, J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cyptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen.
5. Billings, W.D. & Drew, W.B. 1938. Bark factors affecting the distribution of corticolous bryophyte communities. Am. Midl. Nat. 20: 302-330.
6. Cain, S.A. & Sharp, A.J. 1938. Bryophytic unions of certain forest types of the Great Smokey Mountains. Am. Midl. Nat. 20: 249-301.
7. Christensen, N.L. & Peet, R.K. 1980. Succession: a population process. Vegetatio 43: 131-140.
8. Christensen, N.L. & Peet, R.K. 1984. Convergence during secondary forest succession. J. Ecol. 72: 25-36.
9. Cornelissen, J.H.C. & Karssemeijer, G.J. 1987. Bryophyte vegetation on spruce stumps in the Hautes-Fagnes, Belgium, with special reference to wood decay. Phytocoenologia 15: 485-504.
10. Crum, H.A. & Anderson, L.E. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York, NY. 2 vols.
11. Culberson, W.L. 1955. The corticolous communities of lichens and bryophytes in the upland forest of North Wisconsin. Ecology 25: 215-231.
12. Edeburn, J. 1981. Management of the Duke Forest. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Duke University, Durham, NC.
13. Esslinger, T.L. & Egan, R.S. 1995. A sixth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. Bryologist 98: 467.
14. Famigetti, R. 1994. World Almanac 1994. Funk & Wagnalls, Mahwah, NJ.
15. Gough, L.P. 1975. Cryptogam distributions on Psendotsuga menziesii and Abies lasiocarpa in the Front Range, Boulder County, Colorado. Bryologist 78: 124-145.
16. Graham, R.L. & Cromack, K., Jr. 1982. Mass, nutrient content, and decay rate of dead boles in rain forest of Olympic National Park. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 511-521.
17. Harmon, M.E. 1989. Effects of bark fragmentation on plant succession on conifer logs in the Picea-Tsuga forest of Olympic National Park, Washington. Am. Midl. Nat. 121: 112-124.
18. Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D., Anderson, N.H., Cline, S.P., Aumen, N.G., Sedell, J.R., Lienkaemper, G.W., Cromack, K., Jr. & Cummins, K. W. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 133-302.
19. Hicks, M.L. 1982. Liverworts of the mountains of North Carolina. Center for Instructional Development, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
20. Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
21. Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
22. Kimmerer, R.W. & Young, C.C. 1995. The role of slugs in dispersal of the asexual propagules of Dicranumflagellare. Bryologist 98: 149-153.
23. Lemmon, P.E. 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. For. Sci. 2: 314-320.
24. McAlister, S. 1995. Species interactions and substrate specificity among log-inhabiting bryophytes species. Ecology 76: 2184-2195.
25. McCullough, H.A. 1948. Plant succession on fallen logs in a virgin spruce-fir forest. Ecology 29: 508-513.
26. Muhle, H. & LeBlanc, F. 1975. Bryophyte and lichen succession on decaying logs. I. Analysis along an evaporational gradient in Eastern Canada. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 39: 1-33.
27. Nakamura, T. 1987. Bryophyte and lichen succession on fallen logs and seedling establishment in Tsuga-Abies forest of central Japan. Symp. Biol. Hung. 35: 485-495.
28. Økland, R.H. 1996. Are ordination and constrained alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J. Veg. Sci. 7: 289-292.
29. Palmer, M. 1986. Pattern in corticolous bryophyte communities of the North Carolina piedmont: Do mosses see the forest or the trees? Bryologist 89: 59-65.
30. Palmer, M. 1990. Vascular flora of the Duke Forest. North Carolina. Castanea 55 : 229-244.
31. Panshin, A.J. & de Zeeuw, C. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
32. Peck, K.O., Jr. 1954. Bryophytic unions in the virgin hemlock community of the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest. MA Thesis, Duke Univ., Durham.
33. Peet, R.K. 1980. Ordination as a tool for analyzing complex data sets. Vegetatio 42: 171-174.
34. Peet, R.K. & Christensen, N.L. 1980. Hardwood forest vegetation of the North Carolina Piedmont. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. Eidg. Tech. Hochsch. Stift. Rübel Zür. 69: 14-39.
35. Radford, A.E., Ahles, H.E. & Bell, C.R. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
36. Rasmussen, L. 1975. The bryophytic epiphyte vegetation in the forest, Slotved Skov, Northern Jutland. J. Bryol. 8: 15-38.
37. Richards, P.W. 1938. The bryophyte communities of a Killarney oakwood. Ann. Bryol. 11: 108-130.
38. Roberts, D.W. 1986. Ordination on the basis of fuzzy set theory. Vegetatio 66: 125.
39. Schaetzl, R.J., Johnson, D.L., Burns, S.F. & Small, T.W. 1989. Tree uprooting: review of terminology, process, and environmental implications. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1-11.
40. Schmitt, C.K. & Slack, N.G. 1993. Host specificity of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes: a comparison of the Adirondack Mountains (New York) and the southern Blue Ridge mountains (North Carolina). Bryologist 93: 251-274.
41. Schuster, R.M. 1957. Boreal hepaticae. part II, ecology. Am. Midl. Nat. 57: 203-299.
42. Slack, N.G. 1976. Host specificity of bryophytic epiphytes in eastern North America. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 41: 107-132.
43. Slack, N.G. 1977. Species diversify & community structure in bryophytes: New York studies. New York State Museum Bulletin #428, New York, NY.
44. Slack, N.G. 1982. Bryophytes in relation to ecological niche theory. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 52: 199-217.
45. Slack, N.G. 1984. A new look at bryophyte community analysis: field and statistical methods. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 55: 113-132.
46. Söderström, L. 1987. Dispersal as a limiting factor for distribution among epixylic bryophytes. Symp. Biol. Hung. 35: 475-484.
47. Söderström, L. 1988a. Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferous wood in Northern Sweden. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 89-97.
48. Söderström, L. 1988b. The occurrence of epixylic bryophyte and lichen species in an old natural and a managed forest stand in northeast Sweden. Biol. Cons. 45: 169-178.
49. Söderström, L. 1989. Regional distribution patterns of bryophyte species on spruce logs in northern Sweden. Bryologist 92: 349-355.
50. Söderström, L. & Jonsson, B.C. 1992. Naturskogarnas fragmentering och mossor på temporära substrat. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 86: 185-198.
51. Stefureac, T.I. 1987. Betrachtungen und Vorschläge zur Abgrenzung einiger Moos-assoziationen und ihre ökologische Eingliederung in das bryozönotaxonomische System. Symp. Biol. Hung. 35: 405-421.
52. Studlar, S.M. 1982. Host specificity of epiphytic bryophytes near Mountain Lake. Virginia. Bryologist 85: 27-50.
53. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multi variate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
54. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987a. The analysis of vegetation-environment realtionships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
55. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987b. CANOCO: A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy anulysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Statistics Department Wageningen, Wageningen.
56. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987c. Ordination. Chapter 5. In: Jongman, H.G., ter Braak, C.J.F. & van Tongeren, O.F.R. (eds.) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, pp. 91-150. Pudoc, Wageningcn.
57. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Prentice, I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271-313.