An Australian perspective on research and development required for the construction of applied legal decision support systems

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 237-260

  Zeleznikow, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case based reasoning; Legal decision support systems; Machine learning; Negotiation; Rule based reasoning

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CASED BASED REASONING; LEGAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; NEGOTIATION; RULE BASED REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0043264924     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025450828280     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bellucci, E. and Zeleznikow, J. (2001). Representations for Decision Making Support in Negotiation. Journal of Decision Support 10(3-4): 449-479.
2. Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Sergot, M. J. (1988). Towards a Rule-Based Representation of Open Texture in Law. In Walter, C. (ed.) Computer Power and Legal Language, 39-61. Quorum Boks: New York.
3. Berman, D. H. and Hafner, C. D. (1988). Obstacles to the Development of Logic-Based Models of Legal Reasoning. In Walter, C. (ed.) Computer Power and Legal Reasoning, 183-214. Quorum Books: New York.
4. Bromby, M. C. and Hall, M. J. J. (2002). The Development and Rapid Evaluation of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony. In Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based Systems, 143-152. IOS Publications: Amsterdam.
5. Dixon, A. and Self, L. (1994). Copyright Protection for the Information Superhighway. In Firth, A., Lane, S and Smythe, Y. (eds) 1998. Readings in Intellectual Property. A Selection of Articles from EIPR and Ent. L. R. Sweet and Maxwell: London.
6. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M. J., and Sierra, C. (2001). Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199-215.
7. Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
8. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books.
9. Llewellyn, K. (1962). Jurisprudence. University of Chicago Press.
10. Moles, R. N. and Dayal, S. (1992). There Is More to Life than Logic. Journal of Law and Information Science 3(2): 188-218.
11. Richter, K., K., Chicola, J, M. (1999). Digital Rights for Intellectual Property Protection. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference. Law and Technology (LawTech'99), 27-31. ACTA Press.
12. Ross, H. L. (1980). Settled Out of Court. Aldine.
13. Sergot, M. J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R. A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P., and Cory, H. T. (1986). The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Communications of the ACM 29: 370-386.
14. Softlaw (2000). http://www.softlaw.com.au. Accessed June 1, 2001.
15. Stallman R. (1994). Why Software Should Not Have Owners, at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html
16. Stefik, M. (1997). Shifting The Possible: How Trusted Systems and Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 12, 1 (Spring).
17. Stranieri, A. and Zeleznikow, J. (2001). Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents. Information and Communications Technology Law 10(1): 109-123.
18. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., and Lewis, B. (1999). A Hybrid-Neural Approach to the Automation of Legal Reasoning in the Discretionary Domain of Family Law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(2-3): 153-183.
19. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., and Yearwood, J. (2001). Argumentation Structures that Integrate Dialectical and Monoletical Reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 16(4): 331-348.
20. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Use of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
21. Vossos, G., Zeleznikow, J., Moore, A., and Hunter, D. (1993). The Credit Act Advisory System (CAAS): Conversion from an Expert System Prototype to a C++ Commercial System. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 180-183. ACM Press: Amsterdam.
22. Waismann, F. (1951). Verifiability. In Flew, A (ed), Logic and Language. Blackwell.
23. Williams, G. R. (1993). Legal Negotiation and Settlement. West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, Minnesota.
24. Yearwood, J. and Stranieri, A. (1999). The Integration of Retrieval, Reasoning and Drafting for Refugee Law: A Third Generation Legal Knowledge Based System. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 117-126. ACM: Oslo.
25. Zeleznikow, J. (1991). Building Intelligent Legal Tools - The IKBALS Project. Journal of Law and Information Science 2(2): 165-184.
26. Zeleznikow, J. (2000). Building Judicial Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 14(3): 341-356.
27. Zeleznikow, J. (2002a). Using Web-Based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to Justice. Information and Communications Technology Law 11(1): 15-33.
28. Zeleznikow, J. (2002b). Risk, Negotiation and Argumentation - A Decision Support System Based Approach. Law, Probability and Risk 1: 37-48.
29. Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. (1995). The Split-Up System: Integrating Neural Networks and Rule-Based Reasoning in the Legal Domain. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 185-194. ACM.
30. Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. (2001). The Use of Legal Decision Support Systems at Victoria Legal Aid. In Proceedings of ISDSS2001 - Sixth International Conference on Decision Support Systems, 18-192. Brunel University: London.
31. Zeleznikow, J., Vossos, G., and Hunter, D. (1994). The IKBALS Project: Multimodal Reasoning in Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(3): 169-203.