Copyright regulation with argumentation agents

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 109-123

  Stranieri, Andrew ^a   Zeleznikow, John ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068272261     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600830124950     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ball, W.J., 1994. Using Virgil to analyse public policy arguments: a system based on Toulmin's informal logic. Social Science Computer Review, 12: 26–37.
2. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.Z., and McEnery, A.M., 1991. Argument-based explanation of logic programs. Knowledge Based Systems, 4: 177–183.
3. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game. Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Jurix: The Eleventh Conference. The Netherlands. Edited by: Hage, J.C., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Koers, A., de Vey Mestdagh, C.N.J., and Grutiers, C., Gerard Noodt Institut (GNI).
4. Branting, K.L., 1994. A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and law: an International Journal, 2: 1–31.
5. Clark, P., 1991. A Model of Argumentation and Its Application in a Cooperative Expert System, Glasgow: Turning Institute. Department of Computer Science. University of Strathclyde. PhD thesis
6. Clarke, R., and Dempsey, G., Electronic Trading in Copyright Objects and Its Implications for Universities. Australian EDUCAUSE'99 Conference. April18-211999, Sydney. At http://www.anu. edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/EC/ETCU.html
7. Dick, J.P., Conceptual retrieval and case law. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. May27-29, Boston. pp. 106–115. ACM Press.
8. Dietz, J.L.G., and Widdershoven, G.A.M., 1992. “ A comparison of the linguistic theories of Searle and Habermas as a basis for communication supporting systems ”. In Linguistic Instruments in Knowledge Engineering, Edited by: van de Richt, R.P., and Meersman, R.A., 121–130. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publications.
9. Dixon, A., and Self, L., 1994. “ Copyright protection for the Information Superhighway ”. In Readings in Intellectual Property. A Selection of Articles from EIPR and Ent. LR, Edited by: Firth, A., Lane, S., and Smythe, Y., London: Sweet and Maxwell.
10. Fitzgerald, A., 1999a. Intellectual Property, Australia: LBC Information Services. LBC Nutshell, (Pyrmont
11. Fitzgerald, A., Fitzgerald, B., Cook, P., and Cifuentes, C., eds. 1998. Going Digital: Legal Issues for Electronic Commerce, Multimedia and the Internet, St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Prospect Media Pty Ltd.
12. Fitzgerald, B., 1999. “ Conceptualizing the digital environment ”. In Going Digital. Legal Issues for e-Commerce, Software and the Internet, Edited by: Fitzgerald, A., Fitzgerald, B., Cifuentes, C., and Cook, P., Australia: Prospect Media.
13. Freeman, J. B., 1991. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments, Berlin: Floris Publications.
14. Greenleaf, G., 1999. An endnote on regulating Cyberspace: architecture vs law. University of NSW Law Journal, 21(2): 593–622.
15. Griffiths, J., 1999. Holding back the tide - a review of recent developments in copyright law in the United Kingdom. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 13: 283–301.
16. Johnson, P.E., Zualkernan, I.A., and Tukey, D., 1993. Types of expertise: an invariant of problem solving. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 39: 641
17. Lessig, L., 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.
18. Marshall, C.C., Representing the structure of legal argument. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. USA. pp. 121–127. ACM Press.
19. Matthijssen, L.J., 1999. Interfacing between Lawyers and Computers. An Architecture for Knowledge based Interfaces to Legal Databases, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
20. McCullagh, A., and Commins, I., 1999. “ Cryptography: from information to intelligent garbage with ease ”. In Going Digital. Legal Issues for e-Commerce, Software and the Internet, Edited by: Fitzgerald, A., Fitzgerald, B., Cifuentes B., C., and Cook, P., 205–214. Australia: Prospect Media.
21. Moore, J., 1995. Participating in Explanatory Dialogues: Interpreting and Responding to Questions in Context, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Richter, K.K., and Chicola, J.M., Digital rights for intellectual property protection. Proceedings of the LASTED International Conference. Law and Technology (LawTech'99). pp. 27–31. San Francisco, CA: ACTA Press.
23. Stallman, R.I., 1994. “ Why software should not have owners ”. at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-freeJitml
24. Stefik, M., 1997. Shifting the possible: how trusted systems and digital property rights challenge us to rethink digital publishing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12(1): 137–159. at http://wwwJaw.berkeley. edu/journals/btij/articles/12-1/stefi k.html
25. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., and Lewis, B., 1999. A hybrid rule-neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7: 153–183.
26. Stranieri, A., and Zeleznikow, J., Proceedings of International Society for Decision Support Systems fifth International Conference ISDSS'99. Melbourne. Edited by: Burstein, R., Vol. A survey of argumentation structures for intelligent decision support, Monash University.
27. Stranieri, A., Yearwood, J., and Meikl, T., 2000. The dependency of discretion and consistency on knowledge representation. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 14: 325–340.
28. Toulmin, S., 1958. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Wayner, P., 1997. Digital Copyright Protection. AP Professional, Chestnut Hill, MA: Academic Press.
30. Weber, R., 1997. Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Coopers and Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology, Monograph No. 4 Melbourne
31. Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N., eds. Intelligent Agents. ECAI-94 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages. Berlin. Springer.
32. Yearwood, J., and Stranieri, A., An argumentation shell for knowledge based systems. Proceedings of IASTED International conference on Law and Technology. pp. 105–111. LawTech. 2000
33. Yearwood, J., and Stranieri, A., The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system. Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ICAIL'99. pp. 117–137. ACM Press.
34. Yearwood, J., Stranieri, A., and Anjaria, C., The use of argumentation to assist in the generation of legal documents. ADCS'99 Fourth Australasian Document Computing Symposium. NSW, Australia. Southern Cross University Press.