Representations of decision-making support in negotiation

Journal of Decision Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 449-479

  Bellucci, Emilia ^a   Zeleznikow, John ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Divorce; Family Laws; Negotiation Support Systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041679016     PISSN: 12460125     EISSN: 21167052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/jds.10.449-479     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baron, R. A., 1992. Psychology, Allyn and Bacon M.A.
2. Bellucci, E., and Zeleznikow, J., Family_Negotiator:an intelligent decision support system for negotiation in Australian Family Law. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for Decision Support Systems. Lausanne. pp. 359–373. International Society for Decision Support Systems.
3. Bellucci, E., and Zeleznikow, J., A comparative study of negotiation decision support systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, Cal. pp. 254–262. IEEE Computer Society.
4. Bellucci, E., and Zeleznikow, J., Soft computing techniques for modeling legal negotiation. IASTED International Conference Law and Technology (LawTech’99). pp. 166–173. Anaheim, California:ACTA Press.
5. Bellucci, E., and Zeleznikow, J., Artificial Intelligence techniques for modeling legal negotiation. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. pp. 108–116. Oslo:ACM.
6. Bodart, F., Bui, T., Melard, P., and Vanreusel, J. F., ARBAS’96:A System of Argumentation Support and Organizational Memory. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science - Mini track on Negotiation Support Systems:IEEE.
7. Bond, A. H., and Gasser, L., eds. 1988. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Bonham, J. M., 1993. Cognitive Mapping as a technique for supporting international negotiation. Theory and Decision, 34:255–273.
9. Brams, S. J., and Taylor, A. D., 1996. Fair Division, From cake cutting to dispute resolution, Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
10. Eidelman, J. A., 1993. Software for Negotiations. Law Practice Management, 19 (7):50–55.
11. Fisher, R., and Ury, W., 1981. Getting to YES:Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Boston:Haughton Mifflin.
12. Holsapple, C. W., and Whinston, A. B., 1996. Decision support systems — A Knowledge Based Approach, St. Paul, Minnesota:West Publishing Company.
13. Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E., 1981. “ Influence diagrams ”. In Readings on the Principles and applications of decision analysis, Edited by:Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E., Vol. 2, Strategic Decision Group.
14. Huber, M. W., and Dennis, A. R., Thirty-first Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Edited by:Sipple, R. S., Vol. 1, Hawaii, USA:IEEE, Inc.
15. Ingleby, R., 1993. Family Law and Society, Sydney:Butterworths.
16. Kersten, G. E., and Noronha, S., 1999. Negotiation via the World Wide Web–A Cross-Cultural Study of Decision Making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8 (3):252–279.
17. Kolodner, J. L., and Simpson, R. L., 1989. The Mediator:Analysis of an Early Case Based Problem Solver. Cognitive Science, 13:507–549.
18. Kosko, B., 1993. Fuzzy thinking:The new science of fuzzy logic, New York:Hyperion.
19. Matwin, S., Szpakowicz, S., Koperczak, Z., Kersten, G. E., and Michalowski, G., 1989. NEGOPLAN:An Expert System Shell for Negotiation Support. IEEE Expert, 4:50–62.
20. Pervan, G. P., Workshop on Intelligent Decision Support. Edited by:Burste, F., Linger, H., and Smith, H., pp. 145–150. Melbourne, Australia:Monash University.
21. Robertson, S., Zachary, W., and Black, J., 1990. Cognition, Computing and Cooperation, New Jersey:Ablex Publishing Cooperation.
22. Rosenschein, J. S., and Zoltkin, G., 1994. AI Magazine,:29–45.
23. Saaty, T. L., 1994. How to make a decision:The analytical hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24 (6)
24. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., and Lewis, B., 1997. A hybrid-neural approach to the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law
25. Sycara, K., 1990. Negotiation planning:An AI approach. European Journal of Operations Research, 46:216–234.
26. Toulmin, S., 1958. The uses of argument, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
27. Wellman, M. P., 1990. Formulation of tradeoffs in planning under uncertainty, London:Pitman Publishing.
28. Wertheim, E., Love, A., Littlefield, L., and Peck, C., 1992. I Win:You Win How to have fewer conflicts, better solutions, and more satisfying relationships, 130–135. Ringwood, Victoria:Penguin Books.
29. Wilkenfeld, J., Kraus, S., Holley, K. M., and Harris, M. A., 1995. GENIE:A decision support system for crisis negotiations. Decision Support Systems, 14:369–391.
30. Zeleznikow, J., Meersman, R., Hunter, D., and van Helvoort, E., Computer tools for aiding legal negotiation. ACIS95–Sixth Austral-asian Conference on Information Systems. pp. 231–251. Perth, Western Australia:Curtin University of Technology.