Liver metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MR imaging characteristics

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 181-188

  Danet, Ioana Maria ^a   Semelka, Richard C ^a   Nagase, Larissa L ^a   Woosely, John T ^a   Leonardou, Polytimi ^a   Armao, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Liver, MR; Liver, neoplasm; MR contrast agents; Pancreas, MR; Pancreas, neoplasm

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; AUTOPSY; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER METASTASIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0042706306     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10337     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Martin DR, Semelka RC. MR imaging of pancreatic masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 2000;8::787-812.
2. Rosai J. Pancreas and ampullary region. In: Rosai J, editor. Ackerman's surgical pathology. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p 969-1013.
3. Semelka RC. Nagase LL, Armao D, et al. Pancreas. In: Semelka RC. Abdominal-pelvic MRI. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002. p 373-490.
4. Baum S. Hepatic arteriography. In: Baum S, editor. Abram's angiography. 4th ed. New York: Little-Brown; 1997. p 1433-1456.
5. Nino-Murcia M. Olcott EW, Brooke R, et al. Focal liver lesions: pattern-based classification scheme for enhancement at arterial phase CT. Radiology 2000;215:746-751.
6. Noda A. Inaba K, Sakuragi S, et al. Hypervascular liver metastases from hypovascular ductal cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Intern Med 2001;40:227-231.
7. Karademir S, Sokmen S, Terzi C, et al. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:489-495.
8. Ikeda N, Adachi M, Taki T, et al. Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1553-1563.
9. Padhani AR, Neeman M. Challenges for imaging angiogenesis. British J Radiol 2001;74:886-890.
10. Semelka RC, Braga L, Armao D, et al. Liver. In: Semelka RC. Abdominal-pelvic MRI. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002:33-318.
11. Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:323-331.
12. Stephens DH. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: radiologic diagnosis and staging. In: Margulis AR, Burhenne HS. editors. Alimentary tract radiology, 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994. p 1107-1126.
13. Ellis LM, Takahashi Y, Fenoglio CJ, et al. Vessel counts and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:337-340.
14. Klauber-DeMore N, Van Zee KJ, Linkov I, et al. Biological behavior of human breast cancer micrometastases. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2434-2439.
15. Fujimoto K, Hosotani R, Wada M, et al. Expression of two angiogenetic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human pancreatic cancer, and its relationship to angiogenesis. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1439-1447.
16. Gray H. The liver. In: Gray H, editor. Anatomy of the human body. Philadelphia: Lea-Febiger; 1948. p 1233-1243.
17. Schnider G. Abdomen. In: Runge VM, editor. Clinical MRI. 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. p 289-352.
18. Tylen U. Accuracy of angiography in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas. Acta Radiol 1973;14:449-465.
19. Fidler IJ, Ellis LM. The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. Cell 1994;79:185-188.
20. Passe TJ, Bluemke MD, Siegelman SS. Tumor angiogenesis: tutorial on implications for imaging. Radiology 1997;203:593-600.
21. Bruns CJ, Ellis LM, Radinsky R. Angiogenetic strategies in pancreatic cancer. In: Evans DB, Pisters PWT, Abbruzzese JL, editors. Pancreatic cancer. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p 357-357.
22. Imam K, Bluemke DA. MR Imaging in the evaluation of liver metastases. MR Clin N Am 2000;8:741-767.
23. Larson RL, Semelka RC, Bagely AS, et al. Hypervascular malignant liver lesions: comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT. Radiology 1994;192:393-399.
24. Mahfouz AE, Hamm B, Wolf KJ. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions. Radiology 1994;190:49-52.
25. Folkman J, Beckner K. Angiogenesis imaging. Acta Radiol 2000;7:783-785.
26. Semelka RC, Hussain SM, Marcos HB, Woosley JT. Perilesional enhancement of hepatic metastases: correlation between MR imaging and histopathologic findings-initial observations. Radiology 2000;215:89-94.
27. Mitchell DG, Sani S, Weinreb J, et al. Hepatic metastases and cavernous hemangiomas: distinction with standard- and triple-dose gadoteriol-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:49-57.
28. Noone TC, Semelka RC, Balci NC, Graham ML. Common occurrence of benign liver lesions in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer investigated by MRI for suspected liver metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:165-169.
29. Semelka RC, Hussain SM, Marcos HB, Woosely JT. Biliary hamartomas: solitary and multiple lesions on current MR techniques including gadolinium enhancment. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:196-201.