Change detection in the flicker paradigm: Do faces have an advantages?

Visual Cognition

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 683-713

  Palermo, Romina ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0042426200     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000059     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Archambault, A., O'Donnell, C., & Schyns, P. G. (1999). Blind to object changes: When learning the same object at different levels of categorization modifies its perception. Psychological Science, 10, 249-255.
2. Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 352, 1203-1219.
3. Biederman, I., Subramaniam, S., Bar, M., Kalocsai, P., & Fiser, J. (1999). Subordinate-level object classification reexamined. Psychological Research, 62, 131-153.
4. Boutet, I., & Chaudhuri, A. (2001). Multistability of overlapped face stimuli is dependent upon orientation. Perception, 30, 743-753.
5. Brown, V., Huey, D., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). Face detection in peripheral vision: Do faces pop out? Perception, 26, 1555-1570.
6. Cauquil, A. S., Edmonds, G. E., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? NeuroReport, 11, 2167-2171.
7. De Renzi, E. (1986). Prosopagnosia in two patients with CT scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 24, 385-389.
8. Desimone, R. (1991). Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1-8.
9. Downing, P., Liu, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Testing models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1329-1342.
10. Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79, 39-88.
11. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
12. Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1004-4013.
13. Eimer, M. (2000). Attentional modulations of event-related brain potentials sensitive to faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 103-116.
14. Farah, M. J. (1995). Dissociable systems for visual recognition: A cognitive neuropsychology approach. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 101-119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. R. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
16. Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61-92.
17. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
18. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 59-67.
19. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informative-ness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 213-235.
20. Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within die scene. Memory and Cognition, 29, 296-304.
21. Jenkins, R., Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (2003). Ignoring famous faces: Category-specific dilution of distractor interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 298-309.
22. Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plewe, S. H., Elliott, J. M. G., & DeWitt, M. J. (1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 397-411.
23. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759-763.
24. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
25. Kuehn, S. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Impact of quality of the image, orientation, and similarity of the stimuli on visual search for faces. Perception, 23, 95-122.
26. Laarni, J., Koljonen, M., Kuistio, A. M., Kyröläinen, S., Lempiäinen, J., & Lepistö, T. (2000). Images of a familiar face do not capture attention under conditions of inattention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1216-1218.
27. Lavie, N., Ro, T., & Russell, C. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces. Psychological Science.
28. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
29. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
30. Mitroff, S. R., & Simons, D. J. (2002). Changes are not localized before they are explicitly detected. Visual Cognition, 9, 937-968.
31. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
32. O'Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E., & Kanwisher, N. (1999). fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature, 401, 584-587.
33. Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2002). The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception. Cognition, 82, 225-257.
34. Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2001). Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: Dominant role of uniqueness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 747-752.
35. Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and function of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactioins of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science, 335, 23-30.
36. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
37. Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1988). The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 355-366.
38. Rensink, R. A. (2000a). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
39. Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345-376.
40. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
41. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
42. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7, 127-146.
43. Ro, T., Russell, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychological Science, 12, 94-99.
44. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
45. Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
46. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
47. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
48. Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 764-769.
49. Vuilleumier, P. (2000). Faces call for attention: Evidence from patients with visual extinction. Neuropsychologia, 38, 693-700.
50. Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is "change blindness" attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football games. Visual Cognition, 7, 163-174.
51. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (n.d.). RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOS [Online]. Retrieved May 21, 2003, from http://www.tarrlab.org/rsvp/
52. Wojciulik, E., Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1574-1578.
53. Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 381-389.
54. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
55. Zelinsky, G. J. (2001). Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 209-225.