Quality control in scholarly publishing: A new proposal

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 989-1005

  Mizzaro, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; TECHNICAL WRITING;

ELECTRONIC SCHOLARLY JOURNAL; PEER REVIEW; SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 0042330938     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10296     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Apt, K.R. (2001a). One more revolution to make: Free scientific publishing. Communications of ACM, 44, 25-28.
2. Apt, K.R. (2001b). Towards free access to scientific literature. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 5, 251-255.
3. Arms, W.Y. (2002). What are the alternatives to peer review? Quality control in scholarly publishing on the Web. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 8. Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/08-01/arms.html
4. Bailey, Jr., C.W. (2002). Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography - Version 45. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from http://info.lib.uh.edu/sepb/sepb.html
5. Borgman, C. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Borgman, C., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
7. Brown, C. (2001). The e-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 187-200.
8. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479. Available: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p527y1962-73.pdf
10. Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8, 390-396. Available: http://arxiv.org/blurb/blurb.ps/gz
11. Ginsparg, P. (1996). Winners and losers in the global research village. Invited contribution for Conference held at UNESCO HQ, Paris, 21 Feb. Available: http://arxiv.org/blurb/pg96unesco.html
12. Harnad, S. (1990). Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, 1, 342-343. Reprinted in Current Conents 45, 9-13, November 1991. Available: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnard/harnad90.skywriting.html
13. Harnad, S. (1995). The PostGutenberg galaxy: how to get there from here. Information Society, 11, 285-292. Available: http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001689/index.html
14. Harnad, S. (1996). Implementing peer review on the net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In R. Peek & G. Newby (Eds.), Scholarly publication: The electronic frontier (pp. 103-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad96 .peer.review.html
15. Harnad, S. (1997). Learned inquiry and the net: The role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright. Antiquity, 71, 1042-1048. Available: ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.antiquity.html
16. Harnad, S. (2000). The invisible hand of peer review Exploit Interactive, 5. Available: http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/ A shorter version is published in Nature [online], Nov. 1998, Available: http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html
17. Harnad, S. (2001a). Research access, impact and assessment. Times Higher Education Supplement, 1487, 16. Available: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac./uk/~harnad/Tp/thes1.html
18. Harnad, S. (2001b). The self-archiving initiative. Nature, 410, 1024-1025. Available: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/nature4.html
19. Harter, S.P. (1998). Scholarly communication and electronic journals: An impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 507-516.
20. Harter, S.P., & Ford, C.E. (2000). Web-based analyses of e-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1159-1176.
21. Holoviak, J., & Seitter, K.L. (1997). Earth interactions - transcending the limitations of the printed page. JEP the Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(1). ISSN 1080-2711. Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-01/EI.html
22. Karamuftuoglu, M. (1998). Collaborative information retrieval: Toward a social informatics view of IR interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1070-1080.
23. Kling, R., & Callahan, E. (2003). Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37, Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc. In press.
24. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1995). Electronic journals and legitimate media in the system of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11, 261-271. Available: http://wwwslis.indiana.edu/TIS/articles/klingej2.html
25. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1997). A typology for electronic-journals: Characterizing scholarly journals by their distribution forms. CSI Working Paper No. WP-97-07. Available: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/Wp/wp97-07B.html
26. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
27. Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2001). A bit more to IT: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Working Draf 4.0a, to be submitted. Available: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/wp01-02.htm.
28. Kling, R., Spector, L., & McKim, G. (2002). Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the Internet: The Guild Model. JEP: The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 8(1). Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/08-01/kling.html
29. LaPorte, R., Marler, E., Akazawa, S., Sauer, F., Gamboa, C., Shenton, C., Glosser, C., Villansenor, C., & Maclure, M. (1995). The death of the biomedical journal. British Medical Journal, 31, 1387-1390.
30. Lesk, M. (1997). Practical digital libraries: Books, bytes, and bucks. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
31. McKiernan, G. 2002. E-profile Web-based journal manuscript management and peer-review software and systems. Library Hi Tech News, 19, Available: http://wwwemeraldinsight.com/v1=1/c1=6/nw=1/rpsv/cw/mcb/074190 58/v19n7/s7003/p31.html
32. Mizzaro, S. (1999). A concrete proposal for an automatically refereed scholarly electronic journal. Research Report UDMI/07/99, Department of Matheamtics and Computer Science, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze, 206-Loc. Rizzi-Udine, Italy. Presented at a Workshop at ECDL'99 Conference, Paris.
33. Mizzaro, S. (2000). An automatically refereed scholarly electronic journal. In C. Bavec, M. Gams, V. Rajkovič, I. Rozman, & J. Györkodie;s (Eds.), Information Society 2000-Proceedings of the Third International Conference (pp. 121-126). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Institut Jožef Stefan.
34. Mizzaro, S., & Zandegiacomo Riziò, P. (2000). An automatically refereed scholarly electronic journal: formal specifications. Informatica - An International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 24, 431-438. The Slovene Society Informatika, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
35. Nadasdy, Z. (1997). A truly all-electronic journal: Let democracy replace peer review. JEP the Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(1). Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-01/EJCBS.html
36. Odlyzko, A.M. (1995). Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 71-122.
37. Odlyzko, A.M. (2002). The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing, 15(1), 7-19. Also to appear in Bits and Bucks: Economic and Usage of Digital Collections. In W. Lougee & J. MacKie-Mason (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
38. Okerson, A. (1991). The refereed electronic journal: What, whence, and when. Public Access Computer Systems Review, 2, 5-24.
39. Peek, R., Pomerantz, J., & Pailing, S. (1998). The traditional scholarly journal publishers legitimize the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 983-989.
40. Resh, V.H. (1998). Science and communication: An author/editor/user's perspective on the transition from paper to electronic publishing. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 19. Available: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/98-summer/article3.html
41. Ridley, M. (1997). The Origins of Virtue. London: Penguin Books.
42. Rogers, S.J., & Hurt, C.S. (1990). How scholarly publications should work in the 21st century. College and Research Libraries, 51, 5-67.
43. Service, R.F. (2002). Scientific misconduct: Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data. Science, 298, 30-31.
44. Stodolsky, D.S. (1990). Consensus journals: Invitational journals based upon peer consensus. Psycoloquy, 1(15). Also appeared in: Datalogiske Skrifter (Writings on Computer Science), 29, 1990, Roskilde Univesity Centre, Institute of Geography, Socioeconomic Analysis, and Computer Science.
45. Varian, H.R. (1998). The future of electronic journals. JEP the Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(1). Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-01/varian.html
46. Weller, A.C. (2000). Editorial peer review for electronic journals: Current issues and emerging models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1328-1333.
47. Wells, A. (1999). Exploring the development of the independent, electronic scholarly journal. Master's thesis, MSc in Information Management. University of Sheffield, Department of Information Studies. Available: http://panizzi.shef.ac.uk/elecdiss/edl0001/
48. Zhang, Y. (2001). Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52, 628-654.