Editorial peer review for electronic journals: current issues and emerging models

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 1328-1333

  Weller, Ann C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW; ELECTRONIC JOURNALS;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 0034516457     PISSN: 15322822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1049>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anon. (1996, June 22). Re-engineering peer review. The Economist, 239, 78-79.
2. Anon. (1998, January 24). Publishing, perishing, and peer review. The Economist, 346(8062), 77-78.
3. American Physical Society. (1991, April). Report of the APS task force on electronic information systems. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 36(4, Series II), 1119-1151.
4. Barnsteiner, J.H. (1993, Spring). The Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for Nursing. Reflections 19(1), 8.
5. Bingham, C., & Coleman, R. (1996, January 1). Enter the web: An experiment in electronic research peer review. Medical Journal of Australia, 164(1), 8-9.
6. Bloom, F.E. (1996, January 26). Refining the on-line scholar's tools. Science, 271, 429.
7. Butler, D. (1996, February 29). Peer review "still essential," says researchers. Nature, 379, 758.
8. Butler, H.J. (1995). Where does scholarly electronic publishing get you? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 26(4), 234-246.
9. Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1995, October). E-journals and tenure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(9), 700-703.
10. Flanagin, A., Glass, R.M., & Lundberg, G.D. (1992, May 6). Electronic journals and duplicate publication; Is a byte a word? JAMA, 267(17), 2374.
11. Gomes, S., & Meadows, J. (1998, April). Perceptions of electronic journals in British universities. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 29(3), 174-181.
12. Harnad, S. (1996). Implementing peer review on the net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic jouranals. In R.P. Peek & G.B. Newby (Eds.), Scholarly publishing: The electronic frontier (pp. 103-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Harter, S.O. (1998, May 1). Scholarly communication and electronic journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(6), 507-516.
14. Harter, S.P., & Kim, H.J. (1996, September). Accessing electronic journals and other e-publications: An empirical study. College and Research Libraries, 57, 440-456.
15. Hitchcock, S., Carr, L., & Hall, W. (1996, January 15). A survey of STM online journals 1990-95: The calm before the storm (http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/surgey/surveye.html).
16. Huth, E.J. (1992, April 30). Online journal of current clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(18), 1227.
17. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1998, February). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 108(2), 258-265.
18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1997a, January 1). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156(2), 270-277.