Philosophy's Role in Characterizing the Nature of Educational Psychology and Mathematics

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 147-156

  Kulikowich, Jonna M ^a   DeFranco, Thomas C ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042232612     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326985EP3803_4     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27, 33-51.
2. Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 213-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
3. Alexander, P. A. (in press). Psychology in teaching and learning. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
4. Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
5. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Woods, B. S. (1996). Of squalls and fathoms: Navigating the seas of educational innovation. Educational Researcher, 25, 31-36, 39.
6. Alexander, P. A., Schallen, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315-343.
7. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 24, 5-11.
8. Ayres, P. L. (2001). Systematic mathematical errors and cognitive load. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 227-248.
9. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 489-542.
10. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2001). Constructing networks of action-relevant episodes: An in situ research methodology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 63-112.
11. Bransford, J. D., Zech, L., Schwartz, D. Barren, B., Vye, N., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Fostering mathematical thinking in middle school students: Lessons from research. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 203-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & du Guid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, Jan/Feb, 32-42.
13. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Carnap, R. (1983). The logicist foundations of mathematics. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), The philosophy of mathematics (pp. 41-51). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cerulo, K. A. (Ed.). (2002). Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition. New York: Routledge.
16. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-10.
18. CTGV. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.
19. CTGV. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33, 52-70.
20. CTGV. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1980). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhäuser.
22. Davis, P. J., Hersh, R., & Marchisotto, E. A. (1995). The mathematical experience: Study edition. Boston: Birkhäuser.
23. Dauben, J. W. (1979). Georg Cantor: His mathematics and philosophy of the infinite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. DeFranco, T. C., & Hilton, P. (1999). Distinguishing features of mechanical and human problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 79-84.
25. Dossey, J. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching (pp. 39-47). New York: Macmillan.
26. Ericsson, K. A., Patel, V., & Kintsch, W. (2000). How experts' adaptations to representative task demands account for the expertise effect in memory recall: Comment on Vicente and Wang (1998). Psychological Review, 107, 578-592.
27. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Gazalé, M. (2000). Number: From Ahmes to Cantor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104.
31. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 25, 5-17.
32. Greeno, J. G. and the Middle School Mathematics through Applications Projects Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
33. Heyting, A. (1983). The intuitionists foundations of mathematics. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnman (Eds.). The philosophy of mathematics (pp. 52-60).
34. Hofstadter, D. (1979). Godel, Escher, & Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Vintage Books.
35. Kramer, E. E. (1970). The nature and growth of modern mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (2001). Locating an ecological psychology methodology for situated action. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 165-202.
37. Lakotos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Lambert, M., & Blunk, M. L. (Eds.). (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.(1991). Situated leaming: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Luzzatto, S. (1991). Is philosophy detrimental to mathematics education? Philosophia Mathematica, 6, 65-72.
42. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect of multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
43. Morris, A. K. (2002). Mathematical reasoning: Adults' ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 79-118.
44. Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Reynolds, R. E., Sinatra, G. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). Views of knowledge acquisition and representation: A continuum from experience centered to mind centered. Educational Psychologist, 31, 93-104.
46. Roth, W. M. (2001). Situating cognition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 27-61.
47. Schliemann, A. D. (2002). Representational tools and mathematical understanding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 301-317.
48. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st Century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4-14.
49. Sfard, A. (2002). The interplay of intimations and implementations: Generating new discourse with new symbolic tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 319-357.
50. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Von Neumann, J. (1983). The formalist foundations of mathematics. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of mathematics (pp. 61-65).
52. Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000), Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 43-58.
54. Young, M. F., & Barab, S. A. (1999). Perception of the raison d'être in anchored instruction: An ecological psychology perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 119-141.
55. Young, M. F., Kulikowich, J. M., & Barab, S. A. (1997). The unit of analysis for situated assessment. Instructional Science, 25, 133-150.