Reading graphs: Contributions to an integrative concept of literacy

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-24

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042051532     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220270110068885     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. BARTON, A. C. (1998) Reframing 'science for all' through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12 (5), 525-541.
2. BARWISE, J. (1988) On the circumstantial relation between meaning and content. In U. Eco, M. Santambrogio and P. Violi (eds), Meaning and Mental Representations (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 23-39.
3. BATESON, G. (1980) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity (Toronto, ON: Bantam Books).
4. BECKER, J. and VARELAS, M. (1993) Semiotic aspects of cognitive development: illustrations from early mathematical cognition. Psychological Review, 100 (3), 420-431.
5. BERG, C. A. and PHILLIPS, D. G. (1994) An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (4), 323-344.
6. BERG, C. A. and SMITH, P. (1994) Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Science Education, 78 (6), 527-554.
7. BERTIN, J. (1983) Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press).
8. BOWEN, G. M. and ROTH, W.-M. (1998) Lecturing graphing: what features of lectures contribute to student difficulties in learning to interpret graphs? Research in Science Education, 28 (1), 77-90.
9. BOWEN, G. M., ROTH, W.-M. and MCGINN, M. K. (1999) Interpretations of graphs by university biology students and practicing scientists: toward a social practice view of scientific representation practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (9), 1020-1043.
10. BROWN, T. (1997) Mathematics Education and Language: Interpreting Hermeneutics and Post-Structuralism (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer).
11. CAPRA, F. (1982) The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture (New York: Simon & Schuster).
12. CLEMENT, J. (1989) The concept of variation and misconceptions in Cartesian graphing. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11 (2), 77-87.
13. COLLINS, A., BROWN, J. S. and NEWMAN, S. E. (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 453-494.
14. DERRIDA, J. (1988) Limited Inc (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).
15. DÉSAUTELS, J. and ROTH, W.M. (1999) Demystifying epistemology. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 6 (1), 33-45.
16. ECO, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
17. ECO, U. (1984) Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
18. EDGERTON, S. Y. (1985) The renaissance development of the scientific illustration. In J. W. Shirley and F. D. Hoeniger (eds), Science and the Arts in the Renaissance (Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library), 168-197.
19. FOUCAULT, M. (1975) Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison (Paris: Gallimard).
20. FOUCAULT, M. (1983) This is not a Pipe, trans, and ed. J. Harkness (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
21. FREUDENTHAL, H. (1983) Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel).
22. GARFINKEL, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
23. GEERTZ, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books).
24. GIROUN, H. (1992) Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education (New York: Routledge).
25. GREENO, J. G. (1989) Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr and K. Kotovsky (eds), Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 285-318.
26. KAPUT, J. J. (1987) Towards a theory of symbol use in mathematics. In C. Janvier (ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 159-195.
27. LATOUR, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press).
28. LAVE, J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
29. LEINHARDT, G., ZASLAVSKY, O. and STEIN, M. K. (1990) Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60 (1), 1-64.
30. LEMKE, J. (1998) Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (London: Routledge), 87-113.
31. LIVINGSTON, E. (1995) An Anthropology of Reading (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
32. LYNCH, M. and WOOLGAR, S. (eds), (1990) Representation in Scientific Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
33. MOKROS, J. R. and TINKER, R. F. (1987) The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24 (4), 369-383.
34. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (1989) Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics).
35. NEMIROVSKY, R., TIERNEY, C. and WRIGHT, T. (1998) Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (2), 119-172.
36. NÖTH, W. (1990) Handbook of Semiotics (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
37. OCHS, E. (1988) Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
38. OCHS, E., GONZALES, P. and JACOBY, S. (1996) 'When I come down I'm in the domain state': grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff and S. A. Thompson (eds), Interaction and Grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 328-369.
39. O'HALLORAN, K. (1999) Towards a systematic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts. Semiotica, 124 (1), 1-29.
40. PEA, R. D. (1994) Seeing what we build together: distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3), 285-299.
41. PREECE, J. and JANVIER, C. (1992) A study of the interpretation of trends in multiple curve graphs of ecological situations. School Science and Mathematics, 92 (6), 299-306.
42. QUINE, W. V. (1987) Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).
43. QUINE, W. V. (1995) From Stimulus to Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
44. RICŒUR, P. (1991) From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II, trans. K. Blaney and J. B. Thompson (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).
45. RORTY, R. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
46. ROTH, W.-M. (1996) Where is the context in contextual word problems?: mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14 (4), 487-527.
47. ROTH, W.-M. and BOWEN, G. M. (1999a) Complexities of graphical representations during lectures: a phenomenological approach. Learning and Instruction, 9 (3), 235-255.
48. ROTH, W.-M. and BOWEN, G. M. (1999b) Of cannibals, missionaries, and converts: graphing competencies from grade 8 to professional science inside (classrooms) and outside (field/laboratory). Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24 (2), 179-212.
49. ROTH, W.-M. and BOWEN, G. M. (2001) Professionals read graphs: a semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, in press.
50. ROTH, W.-M. and LAWLESS, D. V. (2001) Signs, deixis, and the emergence of scientific explanations. Semiotica, in press.
51. ROTH, W.-M. and MCGINN, M. K. (1998) Inscriptions: toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68 (1), 35-59.
52. ROTH, W.-M., BOWEN, G. M. and MCGINN, M. K. (1999) Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (9), 977-1019.
53. ROTH, W.-M., MASCIOTRA, D. and BOWEN, G. M. (1998a) From thing to sign and 'natural object': toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Halifax, NS, Canada (Faculty of Education, University of Victoria, BC, Canada).
54. ROTH, W.-M., MCGINN, M. K. and BOWEN, G. M. (1998b) How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9 (1), 25-48.
55. ROTH, W.-M., TOBIN, K. and SHAW, K. (1997) Cascades of inscriptions and the representation of nature: how numbers, tables, graphs, and money come to re-present a rolling ball. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (9), 1075-1091.
56. SAINT-MARTIN, F. (1990) Semiotics of Visual Language (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
57. SUCHMAN, L. A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Medicine Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
58. TUFTE, E. R. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press).
59. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, eds M. Cole, S. Scribner, V. John-Steiner and E. Souderman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
60. WAINER, H. (1992) Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21 (1), 14-23.
61. WAKE, B. (1998) Best bang for education buck debated at school board. Peninsula News Review (Victoria, BC), 11 December, 2.
62. WALKERDINE, V. (1988) The Mastery of Reason: Cognitive Development and the Production of Rationality (London: Routledge).
63. WALKERDINE, V. (1997) Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (eds), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 57-70.
64. WERTSCH, J. V. (ed.) (1985) Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
65. WILLIAMS, J. S., WAKE, G. D. and BOREHAM, N. C. (2000) Bridging the divide between college mathematics and workplace practice: an activity theory perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. http://www.man.ac.uk/CME/staff/jsw8.htm (Visited 22 December 2000).
66. WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1994 [1958]) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (New York: Macmillan).