Soil scarification effects on oak reproduction in two mixed-oak bottomland stands of southern Illinois

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 164-171

  Lhotka, John M ^a,c   Zaczek, James J ^b  

^a Rocky Mountain Research Station   (Russian Federation)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cherrybark oak; Oak regeneration; Soil scarification

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; RIVERS; SEED; TRACTORS (AGRICULTURAL);

SOIL SCARIFICATION;

SOILS;

HEDERA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS PAGODA; QUERCUS STELLATA; TOXICODENDRON RADICANS;

EID: 0041877574     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/27.3.164     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AUCHMOODY, L.R., H.C. SMITH, AND R.S. WALTERS. 1994. Planting northern red oak acorns: Is size and planting depth important? USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-693. 5 p.
2. BARRY, J.E., AND L.E. NIX. 1993. Impact of harvesting activities on oak seedling establishment in a bottomland hardwood forest. P. 155-159 in Proc. Seventh Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Brissette, J.C. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-93.
3. CLATTERBUCK, W.K., AND J.S. MEADOWS. 1993. Regenerating oaks in the bottomlands. P. 184-195 in Oak regeneration, serious problems and practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L., and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84.
4. COTTAM, W., AND J.T. CURTIS. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451-460.
5. CROW, T.R. 1988. Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra)-A review. For. Sci. 34(1):19-40.
6. GARDINER, E.S. 2002. Photosynthetic light response of bottomland oak seedlings raised under partial sunlight. P. 86-91 in Proc. Eleventh Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Outcalt, K.W. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48.
7. GRIFFEN, J.R. 1971. Oak regeneration in the upperCarmel Valley, California. Ecology 52:862-868.
8. GULDIN, J.M., AND T. PARKS. 1989. Development of cherrybark oak in an uneven-aged stand in west Tennessee. P. 327-331 in Proc. Fifth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Coleman, S.S., and D.G. Neary (comp., ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74.
9. GUO, Y., M.G. SHELTON, AND B.R. LOCKHART. 1999. Effects of the forest floor and acorn placement on establishment and early development of water oak seedlings. P. 127-131 in Proc. Tenth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf.,Hay wood, J.D. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-30.
10. HODGES, J.D., AND G.C. JANZEN. 1987. Studies on the biology of cherrybark oak, recommendations for regeneration. P. 133-139 in Proc. Fourth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Phillips, D.R. (comp.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-42.
11. JANZEN, D.H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:465-492.
12. JANZEN, G. C., AND J. D. HODGES. 1985. Influence of midstory and understory vegetation removal on the establishment and development of oak regeneration. P. 273-278 in Proc. ThirdBienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Shoulders, E. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-54.
13. JOHNSON, P.S., R.D. JACOBS, A.J. MARTIN, AND E.D. GODEL. 1989. Regenerating northern red oak, three successful case histories. North. J. Appl. For. 6:174-178.
14. JOHNSON, R.L. 1975. Natural regeneration and development of Nuttall oak and associated species. USDA For. Serv. Rep. Pap. SO-104. 12 p.
15. KEYS, JR., J., et al. 1995. Ecological units of the eastern United States - first approximation (map and booklet of map unit tables), Atlanta, GA, USDA For. Serv. P. 36-37.
16. LARSEN, D.R., AND P.S. JOHNSON. 1998. Linking the ecology of natural oak regeneration to silviculture. For. Ecol. Manage. 106:1-7.
17. LHOTKA, J.M., AND J.J. ZACZEK. 2003. Effects of scarification disturbance on the seedling and midstory layer in a successional mixed-oak forest. North. J. Appl. For. 20(2):85-91.
18. LOCKHART, B.R., J.D. HODGES, AND E.S. GARDINER. 2000. Response of advanced cherrybark oak reproduction to midstory removal and shoot clipping. South. J. Appl. For. 24(1):45-50.
19. LOFTIS, D.L. 1990. A shelterwood method for regenerating red oak in the southern Appalachians. For. Sci. 36(4):917-929.
20. LORIMER, C.G. 1993. Causes of the oak regeneration problem. P. 14-39 in Oak regeneration, serious problems and practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L., and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84.
21. MEADOWS, J. S., AND J.A. STANTURF. 1997. Silvicultural systems for southern bottomland hardwood forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 90:127-140.
22. MILES, C., AND B. WEISS. 1978. Soil survey of Saline County, Illinois. USDA, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. 94 p.
23. NETER, J., W. WASSERMAN, AND M.H. KUTNER. 1990. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Richard D. Irwin Inc., Burr Ridge, IL. P. 948-950.
24. NILSSON, U., P. GEMMEL, M. LÖF, AND T. WELANDER. 1996. Germination and early growth of sown Quercus robur L. in relation to soil preparation, sowing depths, and prevention against predation. New For. 12:69-86.
25. OAK, S.W. 1993. Insects and disease affecting oak regeneration success. P. 105-111 in Oak regeneration, serious problems and practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L., and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84.
26. OSTFELD, R.S., G.G. JONES. AND J.O. WOLFF. 1996. Of mice and mast: Ecological connections in the eastern deciduous forests. BioScience 46(5):323-330.
27. PEZESHKI. S.R., AND J.L. CHAMBERS. 1985. Responses of cherrybark oak seedlings to short-term flooding. For. Sci. 31(3):760-771.
28. SANDER, I.L., P.S. JOHNSON, AND R. ROGERS. 1984. Evaluating oak advanced reproduction in the Missouri Ozarks. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-251. 16 p.
29. SCHOLZ, H.F. 1959. Further observations on seedbed scarification show benefits to northern red oak were temporary. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Note. Lake States For. Exp. Sta. No. 555. 2 p.
30. SMITH, D.W. 1993. Oak regeneration: The scope of the problem. P. 40-54 in Oak regeneration, serious problems and practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L., and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84.
31. STEINER, K.C. 1995. Autumn predation of northern red oak seed crops. P. 489-494 in Proc. Tenth Central Hardwood For. Conf., Gottschalk, K.W., and S.L.C. Fosbroke (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-197.
32. ZACZEK, J.J., J. HARDING, AND J. WELFLEY. 1997. Impact of soil scarification on the composition of regeneration and species diversity in an oak shelterwood. P. 341-348 in Proc. Eleventh Central Hardwood For. Conf., Palardy, S.G., et al. (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-188.
33. ZACZEK, J.J. 2002. Composition, diversity, and height of tree regeneration three years after soil scarification in a mixed-oak shelterwood. For. Ecol. Manage. 163:205-215.