Response of Advance Cherrybark Oak Reproduction to Midstory Removal and Shoot Clipping

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-50

  Lockhart, Brian R ^a,d   Hodges, John D ^b   Gardiner, Emile S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b Anderson Tully Company   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR BOTTOMLAND HARDWOODS RESEARCH   (United States)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006558568     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/24.1.45     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BAKER, J.B., AND W.M. BROADFOOT. 1979. A practical field method of site evaluation for commercially important southern hardwoods. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-26. 51 p.
2. BECK, D.E. 1970. Effect of competition on survival and height growth of red oak seedlings. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SE-56. 7 p.
3. BELLI, K.L., C.P. HART, J.D. HODGES, AND J.A. STANTURF. 1999. Assessment of the regeneration potential of red oaks and ash on minor bottoms of Mississippi. South. J. Appl. For. 23(3):133-138.
4. CLATTERBUCK, W.K., AND J.D. HODGES. 1988. Development of cherrybark oak and sweetgum in mixed, even-aged bottomland stands in central Mississippi, U.S.A. Can. J. For. Res. 18:12-18.
5. CROW, T.R. 1988. Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) - A review. For. Sci. 34:19-40.
6. DEEN, R.T., J.D. HODGES, AND G.C. JANZEN. 1993. The influence of midstory-understory control treatments on regeneration of red oak species following clearcutting. P. 117-121 in Proc. of Seventh Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Brissette, J.C. (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-93.
7. GARDINER, E.S., AND J.D. HODGES. 1998. Growth and biomass distribution of cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings as influenced by light availability. For. Ecol. Manage. 108:127-134.
8. GRANEY, D.L. 1989. Growth of oak, ash, and cherry reproduction following overstory thinning and understory control in upland hardwood stands of northern Arkansas. P. 245-252 in Proc. of Fifth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Miller, J.H. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74.
9. HANSON, P.J., J.G. ISEBRANDS, AND R.E. DICKSON. 1987. Carbon budgets of Quercus rubra L. seedlings at selected stages of growth: influence of light. P. 269-276 in Proc. of Fourth Central Hardw. For. Conf., Hay, R.L., F.W. Woods, and H. DeSelm (eds.). Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
10. HODGES, J.D. 1987. Cutting mixed bottomland hardwoods for good growth and regeneration. P. 53-60 in Proc. of Fifteenth Annu. Hardw. Symp., Hardw. Res. Counc., Memphis, TN.
11. HODGES, J.D., AND G.C. JANZEN. 1987. Studies on the biology of cherrybark oak: Recommendations for regeneration. P. 133-139 in Proc. of Fourth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Phillips, D.R. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-42.
12. JANZEN, G.C., AND J.D. HODGES. 1985. Influence of midstory and understory vegetation removal on the establishment and development of oak regeneration. P. 273-278 in Proc. of Third Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Shoulders, E. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-54.
13. JANZEN, G.C., AND J.D. HODGES. 1987. Development of advanced oak regeneration as influenced by removal of midstory and understory vegetation. P. 455-461 in Proc. of Fourth Bienn. South. Silvic. Res. Conf., Phillips, D.R. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-42. 598 p.
14. JOHNSON, R.L. 1979. Adequate oak regeneration-a problem without a solution? P. 59-65 in Proc. Seventh Ann. Hardw. Symp., Management and Utilization of Oak, Hardw. Res. Counc., Cashiers, NC.
15. JOHNSON, R.L. 1980. New ideas about regeneration of hardwoods. P. 17-19 in Proc. of Hardw. Regen. Symp., Atlanta, GA.
16. KITTREDGE, D.B. 1988. The influence of species composition on the growth of individual red oaks in mixed stands in southern New England. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1550-1555.
17. KRUGER, E.L., AND P.B. REICH. 1993. Coppicing alters ecophysiology of Quercus rubra saplings in Wisconsin forest openings. Physiol. Plant. 89:741-750.
18. 14C-photosynthate allocation patterns in advanced cherry bark oak reproduction. PhD. Diss., Dep. For., Miss. St. Univ., Miss. St., MS. 192 p.
19. LOCKHART, B.R., AND J.D. HODGES. 1994. Comparative gas-exchange in leaves of intact and clipped, natural and planted cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings. Ark. Acad. Sci. 48:104-110.
20. LOFTIS, D.L. 1990. A shelterwood method for regenerating red oak in the southern Appalachians. For. Sci. 36:917-929.
21. LOFTIS, D.L. AND C.E. MCGEE (eds.). 1993. Oak regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84.
22. MCGEE, C.E. 1975. Change in forest canopy affects phenology and development of northern red and scarlet oak seedlings. For. Sci. 21:175-179.
23. MCGEE, C.E. 1976. Differences in budbreak between shade-grown and open-grown oak seedlings. For. Sci. 22:484-486.
24. MCGEE, C.E. 1986. Budbreak for twenty-three upland hardwoods compared under forest canopies and in recent clearcuts. For. Sci. 32:924-935.
25. OLIVER, C.D. 1978. Development of northern red oak in mixed species stands in central New England. Yale School For. and Environ. Stud. Bull. No. 91. 63 p.
26. SANDER, I.V. 1972. Size of oak advance reproduction: Key to growth following harvest cutting. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-79. 6 p.
27. SANDER, I.V. 1979. Regenerating oaks with the shelterwood system. P. 54-60 in Proc. Regenerating oaks in upland hardwood forests, The 1979 John S. Wright For. Conf., Holt, H.A., and B.C. Fischer (eds.). Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN. 132 p.
28. SMITH, D.M., B.C. LARSON, M.J. KELTY, AND P.M.S. ASHTON. 1997. The practice of silviculture: Applied forest ecology. Wiley, NY. 537 p.
29. ZIEGENHAGEN, B., AND W. KAUSCH. 1995 Productivity of young shaded oaks (Quercus robur L.) as corresponding to shoot morphology and leaf anatomy. For. Ecol. Manage. 72:97-108.