![]() |
Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 770-772+767
|
Inconsistent designs of association studies: A missed opportunity
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BRAIN DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR;
ARTICLE;
BIPOLAR DISORDER;
CASE CONTROL STUDY;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CORRELATION ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
DISEASE ASSOCIATION;
EVALUATION;
GENETIC ASSOCIATION;
GENETIC DISORDER;
GENETIC LINKAGE;
GENOTYPE;
HYPOTHESIS;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
PARENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROGENY;
PUBLICATION;
QUALITY CONTROL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
BIPOLAR DISORDER;
BRAIN-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
CHROMOSOME MAPPING;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
GENETIC MARKERS;
GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE;
GUIDELINES;
HUMANS;
LINKAGE (GENETICS);
POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
STATISTICS;
|
EID: 0041828999
PISSN: 13594184
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001329 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (20)
|