The continuity strategy, human behavior, and behavior analysis

Psychological Record

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 333-347

  Dymond, Simon ^a   Roche, Bryan ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041728656     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395449     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ALCOCK, J. (1998). Animal behavior (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
2. AYLLON, T., & MICHAEL, J. (1959). The psychiatric nurse as a behavioral engineer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 323-334.
3. BARNES, D. (1989). Behavior-behavior analysis, human schedule performance, and radical behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 39, 339-350.
4. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
5. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
6. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relational responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system, In J. Donahoe & V. P. Dorsel (Eds.), Neural-network models of cognition (pp. 496-521). North-Holland: Elsevier.
7. BARNES-HOLMES, D., & BARNES-HOLMES, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
8. BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & CULLINAN, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84.
9. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & DYMOND, S. (2001). Self and self-directed rules. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 119-139). New York: Plenum Press.
10. BARON, A., PERONE, M., & GALIZIO, M. (1991). The experimental analysis of human behavior: Indispenable, ancillary, or Irrelevant? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 145-155.
11. BOAKES, R. (1984). From Darwin to behaviorism: Psychology and the minds of animals. Cambridge: University Press.
12. BRANCH, M. N., & HACKENBERG, T. D. (1998). Humans are animals, too: Connecting animal research to human behavior and cognition. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 15-35). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. BORING, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
14. DARWIN, C. (1871). The descent of man. London: John Murray.
15. DESS, N. K., & CHAPMAN, C. D. (1998). Humans and animals? On saying what we mean. Psychological Science, 9, 79-80.
16. DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., CALLAHAN, T. D., & STODDARD, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43, 761-778.
17. DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry In the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22.
18. DYMOND, S., & REHFELDT, R. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239-254.
19. FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
20. FRIMAN, P. C., HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. G. (1998), Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 137-156.
21. FULLER, P. R. (1949). Operant conditioning of a vegetative human organism. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 587-590.
22. GIURFA, M., ZHANG, S., JENETT, A., MENZEL, R., & SRINIVASAN, M. V. (2001). The concepts of sameness and difference in an insect. Nature, 410, 930-933.
23. HARRISON, J. M. (1994). The representative animal. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 207-219.
24. HAYES, L. J. (1992). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 97-108). Reno, NV: Context Press.
25. HAYES, S. C. (1987). Upward and downward continuity: It's time to change our strategic assumptions. Behavior Analysis (APA Division 25 Newsletter), 22, 3-6.
26. HAYES, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
27. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international Institute on verbal relations (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
28. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001a). Relational frame theory: A précis. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 141-154). New York: Plenum Press.
29. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D, & ROCHE, B. (2001b). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
30. HAYES, S. C., BLACKLEDGE, J. T., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3-20). New York: Plenum Press.
31. HAYES, S. C., FOX, E., GIFFORD, E. V., WILSON, K. G., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & HEALY, O. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. . In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21-50). New York: Plenum Press.
32. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
33. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
34. HODOS, W., & CAMPBELL, C. B. G. (1969). Scala naturae: Why there is no theory in comparative psychology. Psychological Review, 76, 337-350.
35. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-242.
36. HYTEN, C., & MADDEN, G. J. (1993). The scallop in human fixed-interval research: A review of problems with data description. The Psychological Record, 43, 471-500.
37. JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Volume 1. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
38. KASTAK, C. R., SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131-158.
39. KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
40. LATTAL, K. A. (2001). The human side of animal behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 147-161.
41. LINDSLEY, O. R. (1960). Characteristics of the behavior of chronic psychotics as revealed by free-operant conditioning methods. Diseases of the Nervous System Monograph Supplement, 21, 66-78.
42. LIPKENS, R., KOP, P. F. M., & MATTHIJS, W. (1988). A test for symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409.
43. LOWE, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the structure of behavior (pp. 159-192). New York: Wiley & Sons.
44. LOWE, C. F. (1983). Radical behaviorism and human psychology. In G. C. L. Davey (Ed.), Animal models of human behavior (pp. 71-93). London:Wiley.
45. LOWE, C. F., BEASTY, A., & BENTALL, R. P. (1983). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed-Interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 157-164.
46. LOWE, C. F., HARZEM, P., & BAGSHAW, M. (1978). Species differences in temporal control of behavior II: Human performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 351-361.
47. MACE, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529-550.
48. MADDEN, G. J., CHASE, P. N., & JOYCE, J. H. (1998). Making sense of sensitivity in the human operant literature. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 1-12.
49. MCILVANE, W. J., SERNA, R. W., DUBE, W. V., & STROMER, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 85-110). Reno, NV: Context Press.
50. MILTENBERGER, R. G. (2001). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
51. MORRIS, E. K. (1993). Contextualism, historiography, and the history of behavior analysis. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 137-165). Reno, NV: Context Press.
52. NAVARICK, D. J., BERNSTEIN, D. J., & FANTINO, E. (1990), The experimental analysis of human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 159-162.
53. PERONE, M., GALIZIO, M., & BARON, A. (1988). The relevance of animal-based principles in the laboratory study of human operant conditioning. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 59-85). New York: Wiley.
54. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned sexual arousal functions in accordance with arbitrary relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
55. SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A Califonia sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
56. SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
57. SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
58. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
59. SKINNER, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
60. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Author's Cooperative.
61. SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
62. SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., & TAILBY, W., & GARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
63. STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., & REMINGTON, B. (1996). Naming, the formation of stimulus classes, and applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 409-431.
64. WILSON, K. G. & HAYES, S. C. (2000). Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 25-43.
65. ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). Symbolic representation in animals: Emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 363-377.
66. ZENTALL, T. R., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1993). Emergent relations in the formation of stimulus classes in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 795-810.