Multimedia learning system and its effect on self-efficacy in database modeling and design: An exploratory study

Computers and Education

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 249-270

  Cheung, Waiman ^a   Li, Eldon Y ^b   Yee, Lester W ^c  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c eXcelon Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

CASE tool; Database modeling and design; Information technology; Learning process; Metadatabase; Multimedia learning system; Self efficacy; Software usage

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULA; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; METADATA; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

MULTIMEDIA LEARNING SYSTEMS (MLS);

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 0041467287     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00048-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akpinar Y., Hartley J.R. Designing interactive learning environments. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning. 12(1):1996;33-46.
2. Anonymous. (1993). Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Gaithersburg, MD: Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS) 183, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 21 December.
3. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. 1996;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
4. Boloix G., Robillard P.N. CASE tool learnability in a software engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education. 41(3):1998;185-193.
5. Brookshaw, C. & Seoane, D. (1996). Training effectiveness. InfoWorld, 18(42), 14 October. 76,77,80.
6. Brown K.G. Using computers to deliver training. which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology. 54(2):2001;271-296.
7. Busch T. Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 12(2):1995;147-158.
8. Callahan E.R. Jr., Shim J.P., Oakley G.W. Learning, information, and performance support (LIPS): a multimedia-aided approach. Interfaces. 30(2):2000;29-40.
9. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy. development of a measure and initial test MIS Quarterly. 19(2):1995;189-211.
10. Courtway P. Hospital saves thousands using multimedia tutorial. Health Management Technology. 16(12):1995;30-32.
11. Dadashzadeh, M., & Khosrowpour, M. (1991-1992). Semantic integrity considerations for effective data management: important issues for the database course. J. Educational Technology Systems, 20(1), 19-30.
12. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3):1989;319-340.
13. Durbridge N. The interactive world of art explorer. Innovations in Education and Training International. 33(1):1996;30-40.
14. Edelson D.C. Learning from cases and questions. the socratic case-based teaching architecture The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 5(4):1996;357-410.
15. Ellis J.A., Whitehill B., Irick C. The effects of explanations and pictures on learning, retention, and transfer of a procedural assembly task. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 21(2):1996;129-148.
16. Fitsel T. The new net gains. New Zealand Management. 46(1):1999;57-62.
17. Gordon J. Multimedia training in the fortune 1000. Training. 33(9):1996;53-58.
18. Guinan P.J., Cooprider J.G., Sawyer S. The effective use of automated application development tools. IBM Systems Journal. 36(1):1997;124-139.
19. Hannas C. Shopping for E-learning. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 12(5):2001;19-22.
20. Hays T.A. Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 14(2):1996;139-155.
21. Hoffman, T. (1996) Multimedia drives training at marine corps. Computerworld, 30(45), 77 & 82.
22. Hsu, C. (1985). Structured databases systems analysis and design through two-stage entity-relationship approach. Proceedings 4th International Conference on Entity Relationship Approach, 56-63.
23. Hsu C. Enterprise integration and modeling: the metadatabase approach. 1996;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
24. Hsu C., Babin G., Bouziane M., Cheung W., Rattner L., Yee L. Metadatabase modeling for enterprise information integration. Journal of Systems Integration. 2(1):1992;5-37.
25. Janoff B. User-friendly. Progress Grocer. 78(3):1999;65-70.
26. Large A., Beheshti J., Breuleux A., Renaud A. Effect of animation in enhancing descriptive and procedural texts in a multimedia learning environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(6):1996;437-448.
27. Leigh W., Paz N. The development of educational replicas of software application systems. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 21(1):1993;71-84.
28. Livergood N.D. A study of the effectiveness of a multimedia intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Technology System. 22(4):1993;337-344.
29. McDonough D., Strivens J., Rada R. University courseware development. comparative views of computer-based teaching by users and non-users Computers Education. 23(5):1994;211-220.
30. Milhem W.D. Interactivity and computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Technology. 24(3):1996;225-233.
31. Nelson A.C., Rottman J. Before and after CASE adoption, Dec 15. Information & Management. 31(4):1996;193-202.
32. Oram I. Computer support of learning from cases in management education. Innovations in Education and Training International. 33(1):1996;70-73.
33. Plowman L. Narrative, linearity and interactivity. making sense of interactive multimedia British Journal of Education Technology. 27(2):1996;92-105.
34. Post G.V., Kagan A., Keim R.T. A structural equation evaluation of CASE tools attributes. Journal of Management Information Systems. 15(4):1999;215-234.
35. Ramani K.V., Rao T.P.R. A graphics based computer-aided learning package for integer programming. the branch and bound algorithm Computers Education. 23(4):1994;261-268.
36. Sumner M., Ryan T. The impact of CASE. can it achieve critical success factors? Journal of Systems Management. 45(6):1994;16-21.
37. Taylor J. Moving into multimedia. issues for teaching and learning Innovations in Education and Training International. 33(1):1996;22-29.
38. Vichuda K., Ramamurthy K., Haseman W.D. User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 54(4):2001;541-583.
39. Weller H.G. Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research in Education. 28(4):1996;461-485.
40. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1:1945;80-83.
41. Wild M. Mental models and computer modelling. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning. 12(1):1996;10-21.
42. Woolf B.P. Intelligent multimedia tutoring systems. Communications of the ACM. 39(4):1996;30-31.
43. Wu L., Miller L., Nilakanta S. Design of data warehouses using metadata. Information and Software Technology. 43(2):2001;109-119.
44. Yang C.S., Moore D. Designing hypermedia systems for instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 24(1):1996;3-30.