Perception difference paradigm for analyzing image quality of fast mri techniques

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5034, Issue , 2003, Pages 297-308

  Wilson, David L ^a,b   Salem, Kyle A ^c,d   Huo, Donglai ^a   Duerk, Jeffrey L ^a,b  

^a Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Image perception; Image quality; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vision modeling

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; VISION;

VISION MODELING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 0041357181     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.480335     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Brossmann J, Muhle C, Schroder C, Melchert UH, Bull CC, Spielmann RP, Heller M. Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension: evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging. Radiology. 187(1): pp. 205-12, Apr 1993.
2. Maeda M, Itoh S, Kimura H, Iwasaki T, Hayashi N, Yamamoto K, Ishii Y, Kubota T. Tumor vascularity in the brain: evaluation with dynamic susceptibility- contrast MR imaging. Radiology. 189(1): pp. 233-8, Oct 1993.
3. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Chien D. Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Q. 5(4): pp. 263-81, Oct 1989.
4. Shankaranarayanan A, Simonetti OP, Laub G, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories. Radiology. 221(3): pp. 827-36, Dec 2001.
5. Larson AC, Simonetti OP. Real-time cardiac cine imaging with SPIDER: steady-state projection imaging with dynamic echo-train readout. Magn Reson Med. 46(6): pp. 1059-66, Dec 2001.
6. Shankaranarayanan A, Wendt M, Aschoff AJ, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Radial keyhole sequences for low field projection reconstruction interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 13(1): pp. 142-51, Jan 2001.
7. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wu DH. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 6(6): pp. 918-24, 1996.
8. Hwang K, Lim JS, Wendt M, Merkle EM, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Improved device demition in interventional magnetic resonance imaging using a rotated stripes keyhole acquisition. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 42: pp. 554-60, Sep 1999.
9. Strouse PJ, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Effect of the rate of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration on abdominal vascular and soft-tissue MR imaging enhancement patterns. Radiology. 201(3): pp. 809-16, Dec 1996.
10. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 28: pp. 202-13, 1992.
11. Burgess AE. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. Medical Physics. 22: pp. 643-55, 1995.
12. Jabri KN, Wilson DL. Detection improvement in spatially filtered x-ray fluoroscopy image sequences. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(3): pp. 742-9, 1999.
13. Wilson DL, Jabri KN, Xue P. Modeling Human Visual Detection of Low-contrast Objects in Fluoroscopy Image Sequences. In: Image Perception, Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 1997. Kundel HL, editor; Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press; pp. 21-30. 1997.
14. Wilson DL, Xue P, Aufrichtig R. Perception in x-ray fluoroscopy. In: Image Perception, Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 1994. Kundel HL, editor; Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press; pp. 20-23.1994.
15. Rose A. The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. A38: pp. 196-208, 1948.
16. Lubin J. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In: Peli E, editor. Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific; pp. 245-83, 1995.
17. Hu X. On the "keyhole" technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 4(2): p. 231, Mar 1994.
18. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, Tuithof HH, Engels H, Nelson RC, Gerety BM, Chezmar JL, den Boer JA. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging. 3(4): pp. 671-5, Jul 1993.
19. Jones RA, Haraldseth O, Muller TB, Rinck PA, Oksendal AN. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med. 29(6): pp. 830-4, Jun 1993.
20. Miyati T, Banno T, Mase M, Kasai H, Shundo H, Imazawa M, Ohba S. Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 7(1): pp. 230-5, Jan 1997.
21. Bishop JE, Santyr GE, Kelcz F, Plewes DB. Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast- enhanced breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 7(4): pp. 716-23, Jul 1997.
22. Xiong J, Fox PT, Gao JH. The effects of k-space data undersampling and discontinuities in keyhole functional MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 17(1): pp. 109-19, Jan 1999.
23. Gao JH, Xiong J, Lai S, Haacke EM, Woldorff MG, Li J, Fox PT. Improving the temporal resolution of functional MR imaging using keyhole techniques. Magn Reson Med. 35(6): pp. 854-60, Jun 1996.
24. Busch M, Bornstedt A, Wendt M, Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Gronemeyer D. Fast "real time" imaging with different k-space update strategies for interventional procedures. J Magn Reson Imaging. 8(4): pp. 944-54, 1998.
25. S.Daly. The Visual Differences Predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In: Digitial Images and Human Vision, ed. A.Watson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, pp. 179-206.
26. K.A.Salem, J.S.Lewin, A.J.Aschoff, J.L.Duerk, and D.L.Wilson, "Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging," Journal of Electronic Imaging 11, pp. 224-235, Apr, 2002.
27. J.J.McCann, S.P.McKee, and T.H.Taylor, "Quantitative studies in Retinex Theory: A comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the "Color Mondrian" experiements," Vision Research 16, pp. 445-458, 1976.
28. C.F.Hall and E.L.Hall, "A nonlinear model for the spatial characteristics of the human visual system," IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics SMC-7, pp. 161-170, 1977.
29. J.L.Mannos and D.J.Sakrison, "The effects of a visual fiedlity criterion on the encoding of images," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-20, pp. 525-536, Jul, 1974.
30. R.C.Carter and E.C.Carter, "CIE L*u*v* color-difference equations for self-luminous displays.," Color Research and Application 8, pp. 252-253, 1983.
31. CIE, Colorimetry, 2nd Edition Anonymous Publication No. 15.2, 1986. CIE Central Bureau. Vienna, Austria.
32. D.H.Hubel and T.N.Wiesel, "Receptive fields, binocular integration and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex," Journal of Physiology 160, pp. 106-154, 1962.
33. C.F.Stromeyer and B.Julesz, "Spatial-frequency masking in vision: Critical bands and spread of masking," Journal of the Optical Society of America A 62, pp. 1221-1232, 1972.
34. A.B.Watson, "The Cortex Transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images," Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 39, pp. 311-327, 1987.
35. E.Peli, "Contrast in complex images," Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, pp. 2032-2040, Oct, 1990.
36. J.Lubin. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In: Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, ed. E.Peli. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific, 1995, pp. 245-283.
37. I.Rybak, V.Gusakova, A.Golovan, L.Podladchikova, and N.Shevtsova, "A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition," Vision Research 38, pp. 2387-2400, 1998.
38. Kayargadde V, Martens J-B. Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 13(6): pp. 1166-77, Jun 1996.
39. Martens J-B, Meesters L. Image Dissimilarity. Signal Processing. 70: pp. 155-76, 1998.
40. Henkelman RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys. 12(2): pp. 232-3, Mar 1985.
41. Macovski A. Noise in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 36(3): pp. 494-7, Sep 1996.
42. H.Moriguchi, M.Wendt, and J.L.Duerk, "Applying the uniform resampling (URS) algorithm to a lissajous trajectory: fast image reconstruction with optimal gridding," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44, pp. 766-781, 2000.
43. T.A.Spraggins, "Simulation of spatial and contrast distortions in keyhole imaging," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 31, pp. 320-322, Mar, 1994.
44. Moriguchi H, Wendt M, Duerk JL. Applying the uniform resampling (URS) algorithm to a lissajous trajectory: fast image reconstruction with optimal gridding. Magn Reson Med. 44(5): pp. 766-81, Nov 2000.
45. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med. 28: pp. 202-13, 1992.
46. Oesterle C, Markl M, Strecker R, Kraemer FM, Hennig J. Spiral reconstruction by regridding to a large rectilinear matrix: A practical solution for routine systems. J Magn Reson Imaging. 10: pp. 84-92. 1999.
47. Jackson JI, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 10(3): pp. 473-478, 1991.
48. Rosenfeld D. An optimal and efficient new gridding algorithm using singular value decomposition. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 40: pp. 14-23, 1998.
49. Rasche V, Proksa R, Sinkus R, Bornert P, Eggers H. Resampling of data between arbitrary grids using convolution interpolation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 18(5): pp. 385-92, May 1999.
50. Hoge RD, Kwan RK, Pike GB. Density compensation functions for spiral MRI. Magn Reson Med. 38(1): pp. 117-28, Jul 1997.