A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 15-16, 1998, Pages 2387-2400

  Rybak, I A ^a   Gusakova, V I ^b   Golovan, A V ^c   Podladchikova, L N ^b   Shevtsova, N A ^d  

^a DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Invariant recognition; Scanpath; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACIES; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; ROTATION;

EID: 0031829771     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00020-0     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cowey A Projection of the retina onto striate and parasrtiate cortex in the squirrel monkey Saimiri Sciureus. J Neurophysiol. 27:1964;266-393.
2. Stone J, Fukuda Y Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cell with X- and Y-cells. J Neurophysiol. 37:1974;722-748.
3. Wilson JR, Sherman SM Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: changes with visual field eccentricity. J Neurophysiol. 39:1976;512-533.
4. Van Essen D Functional organization of primate visual cortex. Peters A, Jones EG Cerebral Cortex. 1985;259-329 Plenum, New York.
5. Burt P J Smart sensing within a pyramid vision machine. Proc IEEE. 76:1988;1006-1015.
6. Julesz B Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Sci Am. 232:1975;34-43.
7. Julesz B A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends Neurosci. 7:1984;41-45.
8. Neisser V Cognitive Psychology. 1967;Appleton, New York.
9. Noton D, Stark L Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern recognition. Science. 171:1971;72-75.
10. Posner MI, Presti DE Selective attention and cognitive control. Trends Neurosci. 10:1987;13-17.
11. Shiffrin RM, Schneider V Controlled and automatic human information processing. 2. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev. 84:1977;1270-1290.
12. Treisman AM, Gelade G A feature integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 12:1980;97-136.
13. Yarbus AL Eye Movements and Vision. 1967;Plenum, New York.
14. Didday RL, Arbib MA Eye movements and visual perception: a two visual system model. Int J Man-Machine Stud. 7:1975;547-569.
15. Kosslyn SM, Flynn RA, Amsterdam JB, Wang G Components of high-level vision: a cognitive neuroscience analysis and account of neurological syndromes. Cognition. 34:1990;203-277.
16. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M Two cortical visual systems. Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW Analysis of Visual Behavior. 1982;549-586 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends NeuroSci. 6:1983;414-417.
18. Bajcsy R Active perception. Proc IEEE. 76:1988;996-1005.
19. Ballard DN. Reference frames for animate vision. In: Proceedings of 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Detroit: Morgan Kauffmann, 1989:1635-1641.
20. Bolle RM, Califano A, Kjeildsen R. Data and model driven foveation. IBM Technical Report, 1989.
21. Rao RPN, Ballard DN. Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Technical Report 96.2. University of Rochester, 1996.
22. Rao RPN, Zelinsky GJ, Hayhoe MM, Ballard DN. Eye movements in visual cognition: a computational study. Technical Report 97.1. University of Rochester, 1997.
23. Rimey RD, Brown CM. Selective attention as sequential behavior: Modeling eye movements with an augmented hidden Markov model. Technical Report 327. University of Rochester, 1990.
24. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN Receptive fields, binocular integration and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 160:1962;106-154.
25. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN Sequence, regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J Comp Neurol. 158:1974;267-293.
26. Enns JT, Rensink RA Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science. 247:1990;721-723.
27. Enns JT, Rensink RA Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawing. Psychol Rev. 98:1991;335-351.
28. Marr D Vision. 1982;WH Freeman, New York.
29. Palmer SE The psychology of perceptual organization: a transformational approach. Beck J, Hope B, Rosenfeld A Human and Machine Vision. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
30. Hinton GE, Lang KJ. Shape recognition and illusory conjunctions. Procedings of 9th International Joint Conference Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles, 1985:252-259.
31. Carpenter GA, Grossberg S, Lesher GW. A what-and-where neural network for invariant image preprocessing. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center. 1992:303-308.
32. Olshausen B, Anderson C, Van Essen D. A neural model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition. CNS Memo 18, Pasadena: California Institute of Technology, 1992.
33. Otto I, Grandguillaume P, Boutkhil L, Burnod Y Direct and indirect cooperation between temporal and parietal networks for invariant visual recognition. J Cog Neurosci. 4:1992;35-57.
34. Rueckl JG, Cave KR, Kosslyn SM Why are 'what' and 'where' processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation. J Cog Neurosci. 1:1989;171-186.
35. Grossberg S, Mingolla E, Todorovic D A neural network architecture for preattentive vision. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 36:1989;65-84.
36. Lippmann RP. An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE Trans ASSP, 1989;4:4-22.
37. Hopfield JJ Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 79:1982;2554-2558.
38. Cave KR, Wolfe JM Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cogn Psychol. 22:1990;225-271.
39. Wolfe JM, Cave KR Deploying visual attention: the guided search model. Troscianko T, Blake A AI and the Eye. 1990;79-103 Wiley, Chichester, UK.
40. Wolfe JM Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 1:1994;202-238.
41. Posner MI, Cohen Y Components of visual orienting. Bouma H, Bowhuis D Attention and Performance X. 1984;531-556 Erlboum, Hillsdale, NJ.
42. Rimey RD, Brown CM. Selective attention as sequential behavior: Modeling eye movements with an augmented hidden Markov model. Technical Report 327. University of Rochester, 1990.
43. Yeshurun Y, Schwartz EL Shape description with a space-variant sensor: algorithms for scan-path, fusion, and convergence over multiple scans. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 11:1989;1217-1222.
44. Schwartz EL Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: a spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding. Brain Res. 20:1980;645-669.
45. Tarr MJ, Pinker S Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn Psychol. 21:1989;233-282.
46. Larsen A, Bundesen C Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform. 4:1978;1-20.
47. Farah MJ, Hammond KM Mental rotation and orientation-invariant object recognition: dissociable process. Cognition. 29:1988;29-46.
48. McMullen PA, Farah MJ Viewer-centered and object-centered representations in the recognition of naturalistic line drawings. Psychol Sci. 4:1991;275-277.
49. Gibson JJ. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Miflin, 1950.
50. Hecht-Nielsen R, Zhou YT VARTAC: A foveal active vision ATR system. Neural Netw. 8:1995;1309-1321.