An uncertainty principle in chromosome positioning

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 393-396

  Parada, Luis A ^a   Roix, Jeffrey J ^a   Misteli, Tom ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; RNA;

CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOME; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; GENE LOCUS; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERPHASE; MAMMAL CELL; MICROSCOPY; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; OBSERVATION; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 0041346000     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00149-1     Document Type: Short Survey

References (21)

1. Cremer T., Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:2001;292-301.
2. Parada L., Misteli T. Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus. Trends Cell Biol. 12:2002;425.
3. Croft J.A., et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 145:1999;1119-1131.
4. Sun H.B., et al. Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys. J. 79:2000;184-190.
5. Parada L., et al. Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1692.
6. Walter J., et al. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J. Cell Biol. 160:2003;685-697.
7. Gerlich D., et al. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell. 112:2003;751-764.
8. Vazquez J., et al. Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;1227-1239.
9. Zink D., et al. Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo. Hum. Genet. 102:1998;241-251.
10. Manders E., et al. Direct imaging of DNA in living cells reveals the dynamics of chromosome formation. J. Cell Biol. 144:1999;813-821.
11. Bridger J.M., et al. Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;149-152.
12. Csink A.K., Henikoff S. Large-scale chromosomal movements during interphase progression in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 143:1998;13-22.
13. Tumbar T., Belmont A.S. Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;134-139.
14. Shelby R.D., et al. Dynamic elastic behavior of alpha-satellite DNA domains visualized in situ in living human cells. J. Cell Biol. 135:1996;545-557.
15. Boyle S., et al. The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:2001;211-219.
16. Tanabe H., et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;4424-4429.
17. Misteli T. Protein dynamics: Implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science. 291:2001;843-847.
18. Chubb J.R., Bickmore W.A. Considering nuclear compartmentalization in the light of nuclear dynamics. Cell. 112:2003;403-406.
19. Levsky J.M., Singer R.H. Gene expression and the myth of the average cell. Trends Cell Biol. 13:2003;4-6.
20. Manuelidis L. Different central nervous system cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81:1984;3123-3127.
21. Borden J., Manuelidis L. Movement of the X chromosome in epilepsy. Science. 242:1988;1687-1691.