Using social capital in interpreting the careers of three Latina superintendents

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 58-85

  Ortiz, Flora Ida ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040748485     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131610121969244     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1991). The good society. New York: Knopf.
2. Brunner, C. C. (Ed.). (1999). Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
4. Carter, D., Glass, T. E., & Hord, S. (Eds.). (1993). Selecting, preparing, and developing the school district superintendent. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
5. Chase, S., & Bell, C. (1990). Ideology, discourse, and gender: How gatekeepers talk about women school superintendents. Social Problems, 37(2), 163-177.
6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), 95-120.
7. Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Driscoll, M. E., & Kerchner, C. T. (1999). The implications of social capital for schools, communities, and cities: Educational administration as if a sense of place mattered. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), The handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 385-404). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Durkheim, E. (1961). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Macmillan.
10. Edson, S. (1995) Ten years later: Too little too late? In D. Dunlap & P. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 36-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
11. Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patron, client, and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.
13. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Glass, T. E. (1992). The study of the American school superintendency: America's education leaders in time of reform. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
15. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
16. Grady, M., & Bryant, M. (1991). School board turmoil and superintendent turnover: What pushes them to the brink? School Administrator, 28 (2), 19-25.
17. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
18. Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action, social structure, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
20. Griffiths, D. E., Goldman, S., & McFarland, W. J. (1965). Teacher mobility in New York City. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1, 15-31.
21. Grogan, M. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Grogan, M. (1999). A feminist poststructuralist account of collaboration: A model for the superintendency. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 199-216). Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Gusfield, J. R. (1957, May). The problem of generations in an organizational structure. Social Forces, 35(3), 323-330.
24. Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Helegson, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leading. New York: Doubleday.
26. Hudson, M. J. (1994). Women and minorities in school administration: Reexamining the role of informal job contact systems. Urban Education, 28(4), 386-397.
27. Jacobs, J. (1965). The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin.
28. Johnson, S. M. (1996). Leading for change: The challenge of the new superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Lai, G., Lin, N., & Leung, S. Y. (1998). Network resources, contact resources, and status attainment. Social Networks, 20, 159-178.
30. Loury, G. C. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. A. Wallace & A. M. LaMonde (Eds.), Women, minorities, and employment discrimination (pp. 153-186). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
31. Maienza, J. (1986). The superintendency: Characteristics of access for men and women. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(4), 59-79.
32. Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Marietti, M., & Stout, R. T. (1994). School boards that hire female superintendents. Urban Education, 28(4), 378-385.
34. Mendez-Morse, S. E. (1999). Redefinition of self: Mexican American women becoming superintendents. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 125-140). Albany: State University of New York Press.
35. Mertz, N. T., & McNeely, S. R. (1994). How are we doing? Women in urban school administration. Urban Education, 28(4), 361-372.
36. Miklos, E. (1988). Administrator selection, career patterns, succession, and socialization. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 53-76). New York: Longman.
37. Ortiz, F. I. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men, and minorities in public education. New York: Praeger.
38. Ortiz, F. I., & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in administration. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 123-141). New York: Longman.
39. Pleasant Valley Unified School District reports improved fiscal situation. (1993, April 21). The Pleasant Valley Daily, p. A3.
40. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
41. Powell, R. E. (1984). A comparison of selection criteria and performance evaluation criteria for Missouri school superintendents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
42. Pringle, P. G. (1989). Relationship of general administrative leadership skills to superintendent selection, and contract renewal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.
43. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Robertson, M. C. (1984). A survey of the selection of school superintendents in Massachusetts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
45. Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
46. Sclafani, S. (1987). AASA guidelines for preparation of school administrators: Do they represent the important job behaviors of superintendents? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
47. Smrekar, C. (1996). The impact of school choice and community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48. Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (1997, Spring). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1-40.
49. Tallerico, M. (1999). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 29-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
50. Tallerico, M. (2000). Accessing the superintendency: The unwritten rules. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
51. Tallerico, M., & Burstyn, J. N. (1996). Retaining women in the superintendency: The location matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(Suppl.), 642-664.
52. Tallerico, M., Poole, W., & Burstyn, J. N. (1994). Exits from urban superintendencies: The intersection of politics, race, and gender. Urban Education, 28(4), 439-454.
53. Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 25, 855-867.
54. Valverde, L. A. (1974). Succession socialization: Its influence on school administration candidates and its implication to the exclusion of minorities from administration. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education (Project 3-0813).
55. Wanous, J. P. (1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56. Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Markovsky, B. (1997, December). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571-603.
57. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208.