Perceiving non-native speech

Language and Speech

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 149-169

  Bürki Cohen, Judith ^a   Miller, Joanne L ^b   Eimas, Peter D ^c  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Monitoring; Non native speech; Perception; Phoneme; Postlexical; Prelexical; Processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MULTILINGUALISM; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0040152552     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00238309010440020201     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. CUTLER, A., MEHLER, J., NORRIS, D., & SEGUI, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
2. CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. EIMAS, P. D., MARCOVITZ HORNSTEIN, S. B., & PAYTON, P. (1990). Attention and the role of dual codes in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 160-180.
4. EIMAS, P. D., & NYGAARD, L. C. (1992). Contextual coherence and attention in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 375-395.
5. FOSS, D. J., & GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1983). Cracking the dual code: Toward a unitary model of phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 609-632.
6. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
7. KALIKOW, D. N., STEVENS, K. N., & ELLIOTT, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351.
8. LANE, H. (1963). Foreign accent and speech distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 451-453.
9. McCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
10. McQUEEN, J. M., NORRIS, D., & CUTLER, A. (1999). Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1363-1389.
11. MILLER, G. A., & NICELEY, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
12. MUNRO, M. J. (1998). The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 139-154.
13. MUNRO, M. J., & DERWING, T. M. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289-306.
14. NORRIS, D., McQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
15. RUBIN, P., TURVEY, M. T., & Van GELDER, P. (1976). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 394-398.