The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 6-44

  Blase, Jo ^a   Blase, Joseph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040027378     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X02381002     Document Type: Article

References (225)

1. Achinstein, B. (2000, April). The micropolitics of teacher collaborative reforms: Conflict, borders, and ideology in teacher professional communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
2. Allen, L. (1993). The role of voice in shared governance: A case study of a primary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
3. Altrichter, H., & Soukup-Altrichter, K. (2000, April). The micropolitics of quality assurance in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
4. Anderson, G. (1991). Cognitive politics of principals and teachers: Ideological control in an elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 120-130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Apple, M. (1982). Education and power. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
6. Apple, M. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
7. Ashby, J. W. (1996). Micropolitical strategies and tactics a principal uses to influence teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
8. Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Bacharach, S. B., & Mitchell, S. M. (1987). The generation of practical theory: Schools as political organizations. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 405-418). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Bacharach, S. B., & Mundell, B. L. (1995). Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 423-452.
11. Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York: Methuen.
12. Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1991). Micropolitics of radical change: Budgets, management, and control in British schools. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 19-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Ballenger, J. N. (1996). Micropolitical behaviors a principal in an effective low socioeconomic status elementary school employs to influence teachers' instruction-related behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
14. Barott, J. E., & Galvin, P. F. (1998). The politics of supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 310-336). New York: Simon & Schuster.
15. Barth, R. S., & Guest, L. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Becker, H. S. (1980). Role and career problems of the Chicago public school teacher. New York: Arno.
17. Benoy, I. C. (1996). How open and effective elementary school principals see vision and political strategies to influence teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
18. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
19. Blackmore, J., & Kenway, J. (1995). Changing schools, teachers, and curriculum: But what about the girls? In D. Corson (Ed.), Discourse and power in educational organizations (pp. 233-256). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
20. Blankenship, G., Jr., & Irvine, J. J. (1985). Georgia teachers' perceptions of prescriptive and descriptive observations of teaching by instructional supervisors. Georgia Educational Leadership, 1(1), 7-10.
21. Blase, J. (1987a). Dimensions of effective school leadership: The teacher's perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 589-610.
22. Blase, J. (1987b). The politics of teaching: The teacher-parent relationship and the dynamics of diplomacy. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 53-60.
23. Blase, J. (1988a). The everyday political perspectives of teachers: Vulnerability and conservatism. Qualitative Studies in Education, 1, 125-142.
24. Blase, J. (1988b). The politics of favoritism: A qualitative analysis of the teachers' perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24, 152-177.
25. Blase, J. (1988c). The teachers' political orientation vis-à-vis the principal: The micropolitics of the school. In J. Hannaway & R. Crowson (Eds.), The politics of reforming school administration: The 1988 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 113-126). New York: Falmer.
26. Blase, J. (1989). The micropolitics of the school: The everyday political perspective of teachers toward open school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 377-407.
27. Blase, J. (1990). Some negative effects of principals' control-oriented and protective political behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 727-753.
28. Blase, J. (1991a). Everyday political perspectives of teachers toward students: The dynamics of diplomacy. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 185-206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Blase, J. (1991b). The micropolitical orientation of teachers toward closed school principals. Education and Urban Society, 23, 356-378.
30. Blase, J. (Ed.). (1991c). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Blase, J. (1993). The micropolitics of effective school-based leadership: Teachers' perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 142-163.
32. Blase, J. (1997). The micropolitics of teaching. In B. Biddle, T. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 939-970). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
33. Blase, J. (1998). The micropolitics of educational change. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), The international handbook of educational change (pp. 544-557). London: Kluwer.
34. Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. London: Cassell Teachers College Press.
35. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1994). Empowering teachers: What successful teachers do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
36. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1995). The micropolitics of successful supervisor-teacher interaction in instructional conferences. In D. Corson (Ed.), Discourse and power in educational organizations (pp. 55-70). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
37. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996a). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers' sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35, 138-164.
38. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996b). Micropolitical strategies used by administrators and teachers in instructional conferences. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42, 345-360.
39. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1997). The fire is back: Principals sharing school governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
40. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
41. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
42. Blase, J., Blase, J., Anderson, G. L., & Dungan, S. (1995). Democratic principals in action: Eight pioneers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
43. Blase, J., & Roberts, J. (1994). The micropolitics of teacher work involvement: Effective principals' impacts on teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 67-94.
44. Blase, J., & Williams, H. B. (1987). Politics in the school: Teachers' political orientations toward the principal. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 26(2), 72-80.
45. Bloemendaal-Gruett, J. M. (1997). The micropolitics involved in implementing multicultural curriculum in greater Minnesota Public Elementary Schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
46. Bloome, D., & Willen, J. (1991). Toward a micropolitics of classroom interaction. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 207-236). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1984). Modern approaches to understanding and managing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Boyd, W. L. (1991). Foreword. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. vii-ix). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Brieschke, P. A. (1983). A case study of teacher role enactment in an urban elementary school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(4), 59-83.
51. Burlingame, M. (1988). Review of the micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 281-283.
52. Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
53. Cain, E. A. (1994). A high school principal's influence in shaping demands and mobilizing support with teachers, parents, and central office administrators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
54. Calhoun, E. (1994). How to use action research in the self-renewing school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
55. Carr, C.N.S. (1992). Verbal and nonverbal micropolitical communication and female school principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
56. Cilo, D. C. (1990). The micropolitical strategies of high school principals: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
57. Cline, D. H. (1997). Micropolitical characteristics of teacher collegiality and their relationship to teachers' perception of effect on student outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York.
58. Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
59. Cogan, M., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewski, R. (1993). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
60. Cohen, M. M., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61. Conley, S., Bas-Isaac, E., & Scull, R. (1995). Teacher mentoring and peer coaching: A micropolitical interpretation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9(1), 7-19.
62. Connell, R. W. (1985). Teachers' work. London: Allen & Unwin.
63. Cook, G. E. (1998). Supervision in academic disciplines. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 493-505). New York: Simon & Schuster.
64. Corbett, H. D. (1991). Community influence on school micropolitics: A case example. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 73-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Cusick, P. A. (1983). The egalitarian ideal and the American high school: Studies of three schools. New York: Longman.
66. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
67. Datnow, A. (1998). The gender politics of educational change. London: Falmer.
68. Datnow, A. (2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 357-374.
69. Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. (1994). The social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 141-173.
70. Deetz, S. A. (1994). The micro-politics of identity formation in the workplace: The case of a knowledge intensive firm. Human Studies, 17, 23-44.
71. Detorie, D. A. (1993). Political behavior of principals in effective and efficient and ineffective and inefficient high-socioeconomic status elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
72. Dungan, S. L. (1993). Effects of evaluation, demographics, and perception on control strategies in supervisory conferences in the Southeast. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
73. Ellis, M. (1991). Research in clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 30, 238-251.
74. Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London: Sir Isaac Pitman.
75. Feldman, A., Rearick, M., & Weiss, T. (1999, April). Teacher development and action research: Findings from five years of action research in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
76. Ferris, G. R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. Journal of Management, 17, 447-488.
77. Fileto, B. E. (1993). Micropolitics in action: A case study of a public upper elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
78. Firth, G. R. (1998). Governance of school supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 872-943). New York: Simon & Schuster.
79. Frana, B. S. (1995). Process of educational innovation: A micropolitical study of the implementation of a team teaching model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls.
80. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. New York: Bergin & Harvey.
81. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research.
82. Gandz, J., & Murray, V. V. (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 237-251.
83. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.
84. Ginsberg, M. B. (1995). The politics of educators' work and lives. New York: Garland.
85. Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. Boston: Bergin and Garvey.
86. Glanz, J. (1994). Dilemmas of assistant principals in their supervision role: Reflections of an assistant principal. Journal of School Leadership, 4, 577-590.
87. Glanz, J. (1995). Exploring supervision history: An invitation and agenda. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(2), 95-113.
88. Glickman, C. D. (1985). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
89. Glickman, C. D. (Ed.). (1992). Supervision in transition: The 1992 ASCD yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
90. Glickman, C. D. (1993). Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
91. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
92. Gordon, S. P. (1997). Has the field of supervision evolved to a point that it should be called something else? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 114-123). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
93. Gratz, L. W. (1998). The micropolitics of special education in three Minnesota school districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
94. Greenfield, W. D. (1991). The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 161-184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
95. Gremillion, J. T. (1997). Understanding teacher relationships during a mandated reform: A micropolitical perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA.
96. Grimmett, P. P., & Crehan, E. P. (1992). The nature of collegiality in teacher development: The case of clinical supervision. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 56-85). London: Falmer.
97. Gronn, P. (1986). Politics, power and the management of schools. In E. Hoyle (Ed.), The world yearbook of education 1986: The management of schools (pp. 45-54). London: Kogan Page.
98. Guskey, T. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Research, 15(5), 5-12.
99. Haag, S. G. (1995). The possibility of reform: Micropolitics in educational institutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tempe.
100. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996a). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
101. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996b). The principal's role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723-783). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
102. Hampel, R. L. (1995). The micropolitics of RE: Learning. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 597-616.
103. Hanson, M. (1976). Beyond the bureaucratic model: A study of power and autonomy in educational decision-making. Interchange, 7(1), 27-38.
104. Hardy, C. (1987). The contribution of political science to organizational behavior. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 96-108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
105. Hargreaves, A. (1990). Teachers' work and the politics of time and space. Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 303-320.
106. Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 46-72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
107. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Development and desire: A postmodern perspective. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), New paradigms and practices in professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
108. Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (1997). Micro-politics in initial teacher education: Luke's story. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23, 119-129.
109. Holland, P. E. (1998). Processes and techniques in supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 397-408). New York: Simon & Schuster.
110. House, E. R. (1976). The micropolitics of innovation: Nine propositions. Phi Delta Kappan, 57, 337-340.
111. Howard-Miller, J. R. (1993). Principal political behavior in effective, efficient and ineffective, inefficient high socioeconomic status high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
112. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
113. Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
114. Iannaccone, L. (1975). Educational policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University Press.
115. Johnson, B. L. (2001). Micropolitical dynamics of education interests: A view from within. Educational Policy, 15, 115-134.
116. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
117. Johnson, S. H. (1994). Micropolitical behaviors of principals and the effect on efficiency and effectiveness in lower socioeconomic middle schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
118. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
119. Kerchner, C. T. (1982). How teachers gain influence in their work places: A study of the micropolitics of legitimacy. California Journal of Teacher Education, 9, 79-99.
120. Killian, J. E., & Post, D. M. (1998). Scientific dimensions of supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1032-1054). New York: Simon & Schuster.
121. Kirst, M. W., & Walker, D. F. (1971). An analysis of curriculum policy-making. Review of Educational Research, 41, 479-509.
122. Klick, S. L. (1992). Supervised knowledge: A poststructuralist reading of instructional artifacts related to the graduate study of educational supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
123. Larsen, M. L., & Malen, B. (1997, March). The elementary school principals' influence on teachers' curricular and instructional decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
124. Lazega, E. (1992). The micropolitics of knowledge: Communication and indirect control in workgroups. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
125. Leithwood, K., Begley, P., & Cousins, B. (1990). The nature, causes, and consequences of principals' practices: An agenda for future research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4), 5-31.
126. Levin, J., Hoffman, N., & Badiali, B. J. (1987). Rural teachers' perspectives of the effectiveness of various supervisory practices. Research in Rural Education, 4(2), 77-82.
127. Lewis, K. G. (1998). Instructional improvement in higher education. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 721-742). New York: Simon & Schuster.
128. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1984). Teachers, their world, and their work: Implications for school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
129. Lightfoot, S. L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic Books.
130. Lightfoot, S. L. (1986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9-28.
131. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
132. Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798.
133. Maeroff, G. I. (1988). A blueprint for empowering teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 472-477.
134. Malen, B. (1994). The micropolitics of education: Mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school politics. Journal of Education Policy, 9, 147-167.
135. Mangham, I. L. (1979). The politics of organizational change. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
136. Mann, P. S. (1994). Micro-politics: Agency in a postfeminist era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
137. Marshall, C., & Mitchell, B. (1990, April). The assumptive worlds of fledgling administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
138. Marshall, C., & Scribner, J. D. (1991). "It's all political": Inquiry into the micropolitics of education. Education and Urban Society, 23, 347-355.
139. Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 2, 672-678.
140. McNeil, L. (1983). Defensive teaching and classroom control. In M. Apple & L. Weis (Eds.), Ideology and practice in schooling (pp. 114-142). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
141. McPherson, G. H. (1972). Small town teacher. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
142. Miles, R. H. (1980). Macro-organizational behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
143. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
144. Moore, V. V. (1996). A micropolitical perspective of strategic communication between a principal and teachers in a productive, innovative elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
145. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
146. Naegle, K. D. (1956). Clergymen, teachers, and psychiatrists. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 22, 46-62.
147. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001, January). Digest of educational statistics, 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
148. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
149. Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.
150. Nichols, A. D. (1994). Elementary school principals' perspectives of sharing leadership and decision-making with teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
151. Noblit, G., Berry, B., & Dempsey, V. (1991). Political responses to reform: A comparative case study. Education and Urban Society, 23, 379-395.
152. Nolan, J. F. (1998). Supervision in service areas. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 543-554). New York: Simon & Schuster.
153. Oakes, J., Quartz, K. H., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
154. Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 285-312.
155. Oja, S., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. New York: Falmer.
156. Oliva, P. F. (1998). Supervision and curriculum development. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 782-800). New York: Simon & Schuster.
157. Osborne, A. B. (1989). Insiders and outsiders: Cultural membership and the micropolitics of education among the Zuni. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 196-215.
158. Pajak, E. (1989). Identification of supervisory proficiencies project. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
159. Pajak, E. (1993). Approaches to clinical supervision: Alternatives for improving instruction. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
160. Parish, C. A. (1996). Changes in practice accompanying the implementation of the Arizona Student Assessment Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
161. Patrick, B. L. (1995). Perceptions of teachers' micropolitical behavior during change: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Miami University, Athens, OH.
162. Pauly, E. (1992). The classroom crucible: What really works, what doesn't, and why. New York: Basic Books.
163. Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1990). Evaluating the systems: Teachers' perspectives on teacher evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 3-24.
164. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
165. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
166. Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
167. Ponticell, J. A., & Zepeda, S. J. (1998, April). Conflicts and constraints in instructional supervision: Teacher and principal perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
168. Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 109-149.
169. Powell, A. G., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
170. Pugliano, G. A. (1994). Gender commonalities and differences in micropolitical leadership styles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
171. Radnor, H. A. (1990, April). Complexities and compromises: The new era at Parkview School. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
172. Reitzug, U. C. (1994). A case study of empowering principal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 283-307.
173. Reitzug, U. C., & Cross, B. (1993, October). Deconstructing principal instructional leadership: From "super" vision to critical collaboration. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
174. Roberts, J. (1991a). Administrator training: The instructional conference component. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 38-49.
175. Roberts, J. (1991b). In preparation for the principalship: Initiates' problems in conducting instructional conferences. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 38-49.
176. Roberts, J. (1992a). Face-threatening acts and politeness theory: Contrasting speeches from supervisory conferences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7, 287-301.
177. Roberts, J. (1992b). The relationship of power and involvement to experience in supervisory conference: Discourse analysis of supervisor style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
178. Roberts, J. (1994). The relevance of discourse analysis of supervisory conferences: An exploration. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9, 136-154.
179. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers' commitment. Sociology of Education, 63, 241-257.
180. Schein, V. E. (1977). Individual power and political behaviors in organizations: An inadequately explored reality. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 64-72.
181. Schempp, P. G., Sparkes, A. C., & Templin, T. J. (1993). The micropolitics of teacher induction. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 447-472.
182. Schmuck, R. A., & Runkel, P. J. (1994). The handbook of organization development in schools and colleges (4th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
183. Schon, D. A. (1988). Coaching reflective teaching. In P. P. Grimmett & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 19-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
184. Schoonmaker, F., Sawyer, R., & Brainard, M. B. (1998). Methods of inquiry in supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 109-137). New York: Simon & Schuster.
185. Seay, M. A. (1995). How high school principals influence the classroom behavior and thinking of teachers: Principal and teacher perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
186. Sedlak, M. W., Wheeler, C. W., Pullin, D. C., & Cusick, P. A. (1986). Selling students short: Classroom bargains and academic reform in the American high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
187. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral authority and the regeneration of supervision. In C. D. Glickman (Ed.), Supervision in transition: The 1992 ASCD yearbook (pp. 203-214). Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
188. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1997). How can we move toward a community theory of supervision? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 264-280). Norwood. MA: Christopher-Gordon.
189. Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
190. Shapiro, A. S., & Blumberg, A. (1998). Social dimensions of supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1055-1084). New York: Simon & Schuster.
191. Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42, 325-344.
192. Short, E. C. (1995). A review of studies in the first 10 volumes of the Journal of Curriculum and Supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11(1), 87-105.
193. Singh, K., & Shifflette, L. M. (1996). Teachers' perspectives on professional development. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 145-160.
194. Smith, W., & Andrews, R. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
195. Smylie, M. A., & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1990, April). Teacher leaders and their principals: Exploring new working relationships from a micropolitical perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
196. Smyth, J. (1988). A critical perspective for clinical supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3, 136-156.
197. Smyth, J. (1997). Is supervision more than the surveillance of instruction? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 286-295). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
198. Smyth, J., & Garman, M. (1989). Supervision as school reform: A "critical" perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 4, 343-361.
199. Sparkes, A. C. (1988). The micropolitics of innovation in the physical education curriculum. In J. Evans (Ed.), Teacher, teaching and control in physical education (pp. 157-177). Lewes, UK: Falmer.
200. Sparkes, A. C. (1990). Power, domination, and resistance in the process of teacher-initiated innovation. Research Papers in Education, 5, 153-178.
201. Spaulding, A. (1994). The micropolitics of the elementary classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
202. Spring, J. (1997). Political agendas for education: From the Christian Coalition to the Green Party. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
203. Spring, J. (1998). Conflict of interests: The politics of American education (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
204. St. Maurice, H. (1987). Clinical supervision and power: Regimes of instructional management. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Critical studies in teacher education: Its folklore, theory and practice (pp. 242-264). New York: Falmer.
205. Stall, G. P. (1997). A micropolitical analysis of teacher evaluation policy at a Louisiana high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA.
206. Stokes, L. (2000, April). Micropolitical realities as context for inquiry-based school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
207. Strauss, G. (1962). Tactics of lateral relationship: The purchasing agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 161-186.
208. Taylor, F. W. (1947). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
209. Thompson, A. J. (1991). The micropolitics of achieving and maintaining principal autonomy at the secondary level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
210. Townsend, R. G. (1990). Toward a broader micropolitics of schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 20, 205-224.
211. Tsangaris, N. (1994). Micropolitical and face-work strategies of assistant principals. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
212. Voyer, J. J. (1994). Coercive organizational politics and organizational outcomes: An interpretive study. Organizational Science, 5(1), 72-85.
213. Waite, D. (1992). Supervisors' talk: Making sense of conferences from an anthropological linguistic perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7, 349-371.
214. Waite, D. (1995). Rethinking instructional supervision: Notes on its language and culture. London: Falmer.
215. Wallace, A. J. (1993). Principal political behavior in effective, efficient and ineffective, inefficient low-socioeconomic status elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
216. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: John Wiley.
217. Wamsley, G. L., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public organizations. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
218. Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
219. Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change: Gender, class, and power. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
220. Wells, A. S., & Oakes, J. (1996). Potential pitfalls of systemic reform: Early lessons from research on detracking. Sociology of Education [Extra issue], 135-143.
221. Westbrook, P. T. (1997). The politics of elementary school accreditation: A reflective essay. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
222. Willower, D. J. (1991). Micropolitics and the sociology of school organizations. Education and Urban Society, 23, 442-454.
223. Woods, P. (1990). Teacher skills and strategies. London: Falmer.
224. Wirt, F. M., & Kirst, M. W. (1992). The politics of education: Schools in conflict (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
225. Zepeda, S. J., & Ponticell, J. A. (1998). At cross purposes: What do teachers need, want, and get from supervision? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(1), 68-87.