Attribution of Career Facilitators by Eminent Women from Canada and Finland

High Ability Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 89-112

  Yewchuk, Carolyn ^a   Äystö, Seija ^b   Schlosser, Grace ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039911722     PISSN: 13598139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13598130124367     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ALBERT, R. S. (1980). Family positions and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(2), 87-95.
2. ALBERT, R. S. (Ed.). (1983). Genius and eminence. New York: Pergamon Press.
3. ALBERT, R. S. (Ed.). (1992). Genius and eminence (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
4. ALBERT, R. S. (1994). The achievement of eminence: A longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In R. F. SUBOTNIK & K. D. ARNOLD (Eds.) Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 282-315). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
5. ARNOLD, K., NOBLE, K. D. & SUBOTNIK, R. F. (1996a). Perspectives on female talent development. In K. ARNOLD, K. NOBLE & R. SUBOTNIK (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 1-19). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
6. ARNOLD, K., NOBLE, K. D. & SUBOTNIK, R. F. (1996b). Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
7. BASU, S. (1996). Pioneering Hindu women in India: Overcoming barriers and claiming their places in today's society. In K. ARNOLD, K. NOBLE & R. SUBOTNIK (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 81-92). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
8. BELL, C. S. & CHASE, S. E. (1996). The gendered character of women superintendents' professional relationships. In K. ARNOLD, K. NOBLE & R. SUBOTNIK (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 117-131). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9. BENOKRAITIS, N. V. (1997). Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. BIDLACK, G. H. (1983). Unlikely beginnings. Roslyn Heights, NY: Libra.
11. BLOOM, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
12. BOHAN, J. S. (Ed.). (1992). Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women's place in psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. BRODIE, J. (1985). Women and politics in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
14. COX, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. FEINGOLD, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103.
16. FEINGOLD, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61-84.
17. FILIPPELLI, L. & WALBERG, H. (1997). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent women scientists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(3), 95-103.
18. FLEMING, E. & HOLLINGER, C. (1994). Project choice: A longitudinal study of the career development of gifted and talented young women. In R. SUBOTNIK & K. ARNOLD (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 316-348). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. FOWLER, W. (1986). Early experiences of great men and women mathematicians. In W. FOWLER (Ed.), Early experiences and the development of competence: No. 32. New directions for child development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. FREEMAN, K. & WALBERG, H. (1999). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent African American women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(4), 402-419.
21. GARDNER, H. (1983). Frames of mind. NY: Basic Books.
22. GASKILL, L. (1991). Women's career success: A factor analytic study of contributing factors. Journal of Career Development, 17(3), 167-178.
23. GIPPS, C. & MURPHY, P. (1994). A fair test? Assessment, achievement, and equity. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
24. GLASS, G. V. & HOPKINS, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
25. GOERTZEL, V. & GOERTZEL, M. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
26. GOERTZEL, M., GOERTZEL, V. & GOERTZEL, T. (1978). 300 eminent personalities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. HAAVIO-MANNILA, E. (1981). Finland. In J. LOVENDUSKI & J. HILLS (Eds.), The politics of the second electorate (pp. 228-251). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28. HÖGBACKA, R. (1987). Sukupuolinen ahdistelu ja häirintä. Tasa-arvoasiain neuvottelukunnan monisteita 1. [Sexual harassment]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
29. HULBERT, K. & SCHUSTER, D. (Eds.). (1993). Women's lives through time. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30. HYDE, J. S. & LINN, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
31. KARENTO, H. (1989). Sukupuolten tasa-arvo valtion ja kuntien hallinnossa [Gender equality in federal and municipal administrations]. Hallinnon tutkimus [Research in Administration], 4(8), 261-277.
32. KASS-SIMON, G. & FARNES, P. (Eds.). (1990). Women of science: Righting the record. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
33. KAUPPINEN-TOROPAINEN, K., KANDOLIN, I. & HAAVIO-MANNILA, E. (1988). Sex segregation of work in Finland and the quality of women's work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 15-27.
34. KERR, B. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Publishing Co.
35. KERR, B. (1994). Smart girls two: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
36. KOME, P. (1985). Women of influence: Canadian women and politics. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.
37. Kuka Kukin on (Aikalaiskirja) [Who's Who in Finland] (1986). Helsinki, Finland: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava.
38. LUPASCHUK, D. & YEWCHUK, C. (1998). Student perceptions of gender roles: Implications for counsellors. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 20, 301-318.
39. LYNCH, S. (1996). Four remarkable Polish women: antecedents to success. In K. ARNOLD, K. NOBLE & R. SUBOTNIK (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 93-115). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. MACCOBY, E.E. & JACKLIN, C.N. (1974). Psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. MANNINEN, M. & SETÄLÄ, P. (Eds.). (1990). The lady with the bow: The story of Finnish women. Helsinki, Finland: Otava Publishing.
42. MARJORIBANKS, K. (1979). Families and their learning environment: An empirical study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43. MAUDE, G. (1995). Historical dictionary of Finland. London: Scarecrow Press.
44. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION (1990). Developments in Education 1988-1990. Helsinki, Finland: State Printing Press.
45. MUDRY, A. (1996). World enough and time: Conversations with Canadian women at midlife. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
46. NILSEN, A. (1987). Three decades of sexism in school science materials. School Library Journal, September, 117-122.
47. NOBLE, K., SUBOTNIK, R. & ARNOLD, K. (1996). A new model for adult female development: A synthesis of perspectives from Remarkable Women. In K. ARNOLD, K. NOBLE & R. SUBOTNIK (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 427-439). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
48. NOBLE, K., SUBOTNIK, R. & ARNOLD, K. (1999). To thine own self be true: A new model of female talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 140-149.
49. NORGANG, G. (1994). Gifted women's perspectives on giftedness and success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
50. OCHSE, R. (1991). Why there are relatively few women creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(4), 334-343.
51. ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD) (1995). Finland: Development co-operation review series, No. 11. Paris: Development Assistance Committee, OECD.
52. PASTERNAK, P. (Ed.). (1986). Who's who of Canadian women. Toronto: Trans-Canada.
53. PIIRTO, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (Creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142-147.
54. REIS, S. (1995). Older women's reflections on eminence: Obstacles and opportunities. Roeper Review, 18(1), 66-72.
55. REIS, S. (1998). Work left undone: Choices & compromises of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
56. REIS, S. & DOBYNS, S. (1991). Annotated bibliography of nonfictional books for gifted girls. Roeper Review, 13(3), 129-134.
57. RENZULLI, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. STERNBERG & J. E. DAVIDSON (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. ROGERS, K. (1999). The lifelong productivity of the female researchers in Terman's genetic studies of genius longitudinal study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 150-169.
59. ROSSITER, M. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
60. SCHLOSSER, G. & YEWCHUK, C. (1998). Growing up feeling special: Retrospective reflections of eminent Canadian women. Roeper Review, 21(2), 125-132.
61. SILVERMAN, L. K. (1989). It all began with Leta Hollingworth: The story of giftedness in women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(2), 86-98.
62. SILVERMAN, L. K. (1995). Why are there so few eminent women? Roeper Review, 18(1), 5-13.
63. SIMONTON, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why? New York: The Guilford Press.
64. SOLOMON, S. (1990). Necessary and sufficient characteristics: The voices of nine eminent Canadian women. In J. L. ELLIS & J. M. WILLINSKY (Eds.), Girls, women, and giftedness (pp. 65-76). Toronto: Trillium Press.
65. STEPHENS, K. & KARNES, F. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 219-238.
66. STERNBERG, R. J. & DAVIDSON, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
67. SUBOTNIK, R. & ARNOLD, K. (Eds.) (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
68. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP). (1995). Human development report (1995). New York: Oxford University Press.
69. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP). (1999). Human development report (1999). New York: Oxford University Press.
70. th, 60-62.
71. YEWCHUK, C. & ÄYSTÖ, S. (1999). Eminent women's experience of sexism and sex stereotyping in Canada and Finland. Gifted and Talented International, 14(1), 30-37.
72. YEWCHUK, C., CHO, S. & AHN, D. (1997). Career development of eminent Korean women. In J. CHAN, R. LI & J. SPINKS (Eds.), Maximizing potential: Lengthening and strengthening our stride (pp. 560-566). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Social Science Research Centre.
73. YEWCHUK, C. R. & SCHLOSSER, G. A. (1995). Characteristics of the parents of eminent Canadian women. Roeper Review, 18(1), 78-83.
74. YEWCHUK, C. R. & SCHLOSSER, G. A. (1996). Childhood sibling relationships of eminent Canadian women. Roeper Review, 18(4), 287-292.