An Investigation on the Effects of Using Interactive Digital Video in a Physics Classroom on Student Learning and Attitudes

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 467-489

  Escalada, Lawrence T ^a   Zollman, Dean A ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039899611     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<467::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Atash, M.N., & Dawson, G.O. (1986). Some effects of the ISCS program: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 377-385.
2. Beichner, R.J. (1996). The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills. AAPT Announcer, 26, 86.
3. Beichner, R.J. ( 1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. The Physics Teacher, 27, 803-815.
4. Billings, D.M., & Cobb, K.L. (1992). Effects of learning style preferences, attitudes and GPA on learner achievement using computer assisted interactive videodisc instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19, 12-16.
5. Blissett, G., & Atkins, M. (1993). Are they thinking? Are they learning? A study of the use of interactive video. Computers in Education, 21, 31-39.
6. Brassell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 385-395.
7. Brungardt, J.B., & Zollman, D.A. (1996). The influence of interactive videodisc instruction using real-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 855-869.
8. Cadmus, R.R., Jr. (1990). A video technique to facilitate the visualization of physical phenomena. American Journal of Physics, 58, 397-399.
9. Chaudhury, S.R., & Zollman, D.A. (1994). Image processing enhances the value of digital video in physics instruction. Computers in Physics Education, 8, 518-523.
10. Delcourt, M.A.B., & Kinzie, M.B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 35-41.
11. Dyck, J.L., & Smither, J.A. (1994). Age differences in computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 239-248.
12. Escalada, L.T. , Rebello, N.S., & Zollman, D.A. (1996). Solids & light: Explorations of quantum effects in light emitting diodes. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
13. Escalada, L.T., Grabhorn, R., & Zollman, D.A. (1996). Applications of interactive digital video in a physics classroom. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 73-97.
14. Escalada, L.T., Grabhorn, R., & Zollman, D.A. (1994a). Interactive digital video activities [Unpublished teacher's manual], pp. 1-19.
15. Escalada, L.T., Grabhorn, R., & Zollman, D.A. (1994b). Interactive digital video activities [Unpublished], pp. 1-58.
16. Fuller, R., & Zollman, D. (1995). Physics InfoMall. Armonk, NY: Learning Team.
17. Gable, R.K. (1986). Instrument development in the affective domain. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
18. Graney, C.M., & DiNoto, V.A. (1995). Digitized video images as a tool in the physics lab. The Physics Teacher, 33, 460-463.
19. Hersey, T. (1990). Teacher's guide to advanced placement courses in physics: Phvsics B and Physics C. New York: Advanced Placement Program, The College Board.
20. Hoffer, T., Radke, J., & Lord, R. (1992). Qualitative/quantitative study of the effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive video instruction: The hyperiodic table of elements. Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 11, 3-12.
21. Jones, T., & Clarke, V.A. (1994). A computer attitude scale for secondary students. Computers in Education, 22, 315-318.
22. Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 169-175.
23. Kelly, G.J., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 693-707.
24. Koballa, T.R. (1984). Goals of science education. In D. Holdzkom & P.B. Lutz (Eds.), Research within reach: Science education (p. 31). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
25. Kulik, J., Kulik, C., & Bangert-Downs, R. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based learning tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59-74.
26. Larsen, R.E. (1992). Relationship of learning style to the effectiveness and acceptance of interactive video instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19, 17-21.
27. Laws, P.W., & Cooney, P.J. (1996). Constructing spreadsheet models of MBL and video data. AAPT Announcer, 25, 32.
28. Laws, P.W. (1995, March). Physics without lectures. Presented at the Department of Physics Colloquium at Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
29. Laws, P.W. (1992). Computer-based video analysis of physical phenomena. AAPT Announcer, 22, 58.
30. Laws, P.W. (1991). Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today, 24, 24-31.
31. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
32. Loyd, B.H., & Gressard, C. (1984a). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
33. Loyd, B.H., & Gressard, C. (1984b). The effects of sex, age, and experience on computer attitude components. Association for Educational Data Systems, 18, 67-77.
34. McDermott, L.C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned-closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301-315.
35. Nakhleh, M.B. (1994). A review of microcomputer-based labs: How have they affected science learning? Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 13, 368-380.
36. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. USA: National Academy Press.
37. Patterson, E.T. (1996). Using "homemade" tools to analyze digital video. AAPT Announcer, 25, 87.
38. Rubin, A. (1993). Video laboratories: Tools for scientific investigation. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 36, 64-65.
39. Shymansky, J., Kyle, W., & Alport, J. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 387-404.
40. Sobolewski, S.J. (1996). Development of multiple-choice test items. The Physics Teacher, 34, 80-82.
41. Stohr-Hunt, P. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 101-109.
42. Thornton, R.K., & Sokoloff, D.R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58, 858-867.
43. Wilson, J.M., & Redish, E.F. (1992). The comprehensive unified physics learning environment, part I: Background and system operation. Computers in Physics, 6, 202-209.
44. Zollman, D.A. (1994, Fall). Fall 1994 semester final exam for Concepts of Physics course [Unpublished], pp. 1-7.
45. Zollman, D.A. (1994). Preparing future science teachers: The physics component of a new programme. Physics Education, 29, 271-275.
46. Zollman, D.A. (1990). Learning cycles in a large enrollment class. The Physics Teacher, 28, 20-25.
47. Zollman, D.A., & Fuller, R.G. (1994). Teaching and learning physics with interactive video. Physics Today, 47, 41-47.
48. Zollman, D.A., Noble, M.L., & Curtin, R. (1987). Modeling the motion of an athlete: An interactive video lesson for teaching physics. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15, 249-257.